The Virtue of Natural Immunity By Brian Simpson
It is getting late in the day, with most of humanity having had one or two Covid jabs, and all in principle facing the adverse effects detailed each day at the blog, summarised from numerous publications across the world. Still, it is necessary for true bloods to maintain the lie. To this end we note research from Qatar, presumably not available yet in translation, which examined the national data base for Covid vaccines. It was found that SARS-CoV-2 infection-induced immunity is stronger than mRNA COVID-19 vaccine-induced immunity. The authors then seem to contradict themselves by still recommending vaccination, but I suppose that is what has to be said now, even in material that presents results contrary to the main stream Covid narrative.
“Qatar biomedical researchers tapping into Qatar Ministry of Public Health national population data are at it again offering insight into real-world evidence based on the unfolding pandemic response in that Gulf country. The latest retrospective cohort study using national population data analyzed the national federated database tracking COVID-19 vaccination for this nation of 2.93 million people. What’s the level of protection against COVID-19 from natural immunity (previous infection) versus the Pfizer-BioNTech mRNA-based COVID-19 vaccination called BNT162b2 as well as Moderna’s vaccine mRNA-1273 in Qatar? In this latest study, the investigators represented by corresponding author Hiam Chemaitelly with Weill Cornell Medicine-Qatar find that based on their nationwide cohort data SARS-CoV-2 infection-induced immunity is stronger than mRNA COVID-19 vaccine-induced immunity. However, the study authors still recommend vaccination with one of the mRNA-based vaccines. But why? Because the study authors argue natural infection brings a higher risk of COVID-19-related hospitalization and death at the time of primary infection, while long COVID also represents risk post-infection.
Comments