The Veil of Secrecy: UKHSA's Vaccine Death Data Hoard and the Unravelling COVID Deception, By Mrs (Dr) Abigail Knight (Florida)

The UK Health Security Agency (UKHSA) has once again hoisted the black flag of suppression. On November 15, 2025, The Telegraph blew the lid off a scandal that's been festering for years: the agency is hoarding anonymised data that could finally map the grim timeline between COVID-19 "vaccine" doses and subsequent deaths, a dataset so damning in its potential that UKHSA deems it too "distressing" for public eyes. This isn't mere administrative foot-dragging; it's a calculated cover-up, justified with the flimsy excuse that releasing the figures might spark "anger" among bereaved families or, heaven forbid, dent future vaccine uptake by fuelling "misinformation." Meanwhile, the very same data, vaccination dates cross-referenced with death certificates, has been quietly slipped to pharmaceutical giants like Pfizer and Moderna, arming them with insider intel while the public, the very citizens whose arms were jabbed under mandate, is left in the dark. For two gruelling years, the watchdog group UsForThem has waged a Freedom of Information (FOI) war to unearth this treasure trove, only to be stonewalled at every turn. Last week, the Information Commissioner, supposedly the guardian of openness, sided with UKHSA, greenlighting an indefinite blackout on the truth. In a nation born of Magna Carta defiance, this is not oversight; it's Orwellian obstruction, the latest chapter in the endless saga of COVID deceptions that have eroded trust in institutions to the point of collapse.

To grasp the rot, rewind to the pandemic's fevered peak, when mRNA shots were hailed as humanity's silver bullet, rushed through trials, mandated for jobs and travel, and pumped into arms with the fervour of a religious revival. Billions of doses later, the narrative has cracked under the weight of excess deaths: unexplained spikes in cardiac arrests, turbo-cancers, and all-cause mortality that no amount of "long COVID" hand-waving can explain away. Denis Rancourt's forensic analysis, peering through the actuarial fog, pegs the global jab toll at over 17 million lives, extrapolated to 100 million when you factor in underreporting and delayed harms. In the UK alone, post-vax excess deaths have haunted the ONS ledgers, with 2022's grim harvest showing vaccinated cohorts dying at rates that defy the "safe and effective" mantra. Yet when UsForThem demanded the raw linkage — did that Pfizer dose on March 15 precede a heart attack on April 20? — UKHSA balked, citing everything from "data protection" to the phantom spectre of public hysteria. MPs and peers, from cross-party sceptics to the House of Lords' own whistleblowers, sounded the alarm as early as March 2024, penning urgent letters to Health Secretary Wes Streeting: Release it immediately, they implored, especially since you've already handed it to Big Pharma on a silver platter. Streeting's silence? Deafening. The data, they argued, isn't just a curiosity, it's a public health imperative, the missing puzzle piece to whether the greatest medical experiment in history was a triumph or a tragedy.

But here's the deception's sharpest edge: UKHSA's hypocrisy isn't accidental; it's engineered. While denying citizens the facts that could vindicate or condemn the jab rollout, the agency has funnelled this granular intel straight to the manufacturers whose products are under scrutiny. Why? To "support ongoing safety monitoring," they claim, a polite fiction for letting Pfizer tweak their liability shields or Moderna massage their PR spin before the storm breaks. This selective disclosure reeks of capture: the revolving door between regulators and pharma execs, the billions in taxpayer-funded contracts, the very incentives that turned public health into a profit pump. Remember the 2022 UKHSA pivot, when they abruptly halted weekly vaccine surveillance reports just as negative efficacy plunged to minus-300% in some cohorts? Cases, hospitalisations, deaths, all stratified by jab status, vanished from the public ledger, with the excuse of "testing disruptions" that somehow didn't touch hospital or mortality feeds. Fact-checkers like Reuters and Full Fact scrambled to debunk the implications, insisting raw numbers misled without "context" like high vax rates or age skews. But context cuts both ways: When triple-jabbed 50-somethings rack up 210,000 cases against 7,669 unvaxxed, that's not "waning immunity" — that's a signal of immune sabotage, VAED, or worse. UKHSA's data freeze wasn't transparency's end; it was the prelude to this deeper burial.

The legal noose tightens with every dodged FOI. Intentionally suppressing vaccine-safety data isn't bureaucratic sloth, it's criminal. Misconduct in Public Office demands intent to pervert public duty, and UKHSA's parade of excuses (distress! Misinfo! Uptake!) screams motive. Corporate Manslaughter looms if negligence in disclosure contributed to preventable harms, while Gross Negligence Manslaughter shadows every official who greenlit mandates without full disclosure. Breaches of the Health and Social Care Act's statutory duties on transparency, or the Freedom of Information Act's core ethos, pile on civil liabilities. And don't overlook Fraud by Omission: By withholding data that could prove the jabs' lethality, officials abused their positions, luring the public into a false sense of security for profit and policy's sake. UsForThem's two-year siege exposed this web, their appeals painting a picture of an agency more loyal to Whitehall's narrative than Westminster's oaths. The Information Commissioner's capitulation? A rubber-stamp on state secrecy, echoing the post-vax data blackouts that fuelled global myths, from Bolsonaro's AIDS hysteria to Bolsonaro's AIDS hysteria — wait, no, from the UK's own ONS rebukes for flawed reporting that fed vaccine scepticism worldwide.

This latest deception isn't isolated; it's the connective tissue of a post-pandemic fraud. From the MHRA's yellow-card undercount (one in ten true adverse events reported) to the ONS's "unavoidable" excess death euphemisms, the UK's health apparatus has mastered the art of the half-truth. Globally, it's mirrored: CDC's VAERS burial, EMA's pharmacovigilance firewalls, all while pharma felons rack up billions in fines yet evade jab-specific reckoning. The human cost? Families shattered, not by grief alone, but by the knowledge that answers were withheld, deliberately. A mother in Manchester, her son felled by myocarditis post-booster, denied the dataset that might link his fate to the needle. A pensioner in Leeds, turbo-cancer blooming months after her third dose, left to wonder if transparency could have spared her.

As 2025 wanes, with RFK Jr.'s HHS probes lighting fires across the pond, the UK's stonewall stands as a cautionary monolith. UsForThem vows to appeal, MPs sharpen their questions for the next grilling, and the bereaved, those UKHSA so paternalistically "protects," gear up for class-action thunder. The data will out, eventually, as leaks and lawsuits erode the walls. But the damage? Irreparable. This COVID deception, with its layers of omission and elite exceptionalism, isn't just about jabs, it's about sovereignty stolen, consent mocked, and science subverted. Demand the data. Torch the excuses. The families deserve more than platitudes; they deserve justice. And in that pursuit, the real vaccine against tyranny: unrelenting truth.

https://www.thefocalpoints.com/p/uk-government-caught-hiding-covid