The Vaccine Bioweapon By Mrs Vera West

A nice post at natural news.com, my go-to site, discusses the view of former Pfizer employee and whistle-blower Karen Kingston who believes that the Covid vaccines are bioweapons, particularly harmful to children, who were a low-risk group for Covid, anyway. If depopulation is the goal, it makes sense to polish off children.

https://www.naturalnews.com/2021-12-26-covid-vaccine-is-a-bioweapon-killing-kids.html

“Former Pfizer employee and whistle-blower Karen Kingston told Matrixxx Grooove hosts Jeffrey Pedersen and Shannon Townsend that the Wuhan coronavirus (COVID-19) vaccine is a bioweapon that is harming children worldwide.

Kingston shared a recent study suggesting that COVID vaccination causes the mortality rate to go up. The document showed that in the total number of vaccine doses put in the arms of Americans until December 15, there are over 20,000 vaccine-related deaths. With 200 million injections, 20,000 deaths would give around a 0.01 percent fatality rate, which is the price to pay for having bioweapons inserted into the human body.

There is a one in 10,000 vaccine fatality rate based on that baseline, but this number is very conservative as adverse effects and death are severely underreported in the Vaccine Adverse Events Reporting System (VAERS) system. For children ages zero to 17 years, there’s a one-in-25,000 risk of death from the vaccine. That’s one too many as healthy children have basically zero chance of dying from COVID-19.

In taking a look at the risk of death from COVID through May 11 of last year and before the beginning of mass vaccination in adults and children, the fatality rate was 1.1 to 250,000.

Study shows correlation between mortality rates and vaccination in children

A new study pointed out that there is a correlation between mortality and the first few weeks of vaccination in children.

Children over the age of 14 who are vaccinated increase their risk of dying compared to the general population for the first five to six weeks. If a child survives the first five to six weeks of vaccination, then the risk for death from COVID is lower. However, for the unvaccinated age group, for children zero to 14 years, most associations of mortality and vaccination in adults are positive.

There are also indirect adverse effects of adult vaccination on the mortality of children ages zero to 14 for the first 15 to 18 weeks after vaccination. What this means is that when adults are vaccinated and they are around children for 18 weeks after their last vaccination, the risk of death to children under 14 increases.

Hospitalization from COVID-19 also went up as more and more adults get vaccinated, and risks for children, especially in the zero to four age range, go up tremendously.

With the data shown, the concept of mass vaccination, which is supposed to protect other people and society is harming children and causing an increased risk of death.

While the concept of mass vaccination looks like it is good for society, it is actually a lie. People believe they are being good members of society, but by protecting seniors and the elderly, they are also putting children at risk for death, with children under a year old having the highest death rates.

Overall, the study showed that there is little to no evidence that vaccines reduce community spread and transmission as clinical trials use symptomatic, not asymptomatic COVID cases as the clinical endpoint. Since there is no requirement for weekly coronavirus testing in the participants for most studies, they are not designed to estimate vaccine efficacy in reducing infection.

As vaccines do not appear to reduce community spread for most age groups, vaccine mandates are all ill-advised and there is not much benefit to them other than increasing the serviceable obtainable market share for companies.”

The question then must be asked: who will be held responsible for this havoc? A great article at Brownstone.org, addresses this in detail.  In short, most of the elite, so there will not be any Nuremberg 2.0. They will get away with it, just like they did with the stolen US 2020 election.

https://brownstone.org/articles/who-will-be-held-responsible-for-this-devastation/

 

“If the pandemic policy response had taken the form of mere advice, we would not be in the midst of this social, economic, cultural, political disaster. What caused the wreckage was the application of political force that was baked into the pandemic response this time in a way that has no precedent in human history. 

The response relied on compulsion imposed by all levels of government. The policies in turn energized a populist movement, Covid Red Guard that became a civilian enforcement arm. They policed the grocery aisles to upbraid the maskless. Drones swarmed the skies looking for parties to rat out and shut down. A blood lust against non compliers came to be unleashed at all levels of society. 

Lockdowns granted some people meaning and purpose, the way war does for some people. The compulsion to bludgeon others trickled down from government to the people. Madness overtook rationality. Once this took place, there was no longer a question of “Two weeks to flatten the curve.” The mania to suppress the virus by ending person-to-person contact extended to two years. 

This happened in the US and all over the world. The madness achieved nothing positive because the virus paid no attention to the edicts and enforcers. Ending social and economic functioning, however, shattered lives in countless ways, and continues to do so. 

It is precisely because so much about life (and science) is uncertain that civilized societies operate on the presumption of the freedom to choose. That’s a policy of humility: no one possesses enough expertise to presume the right to restrict other people’s peaceful actions. 

But with lockdowns and the successor policy of vaccine mandates, we’ve seen not humility but astounding arrogance. The people who did this to us and to billions of people around the world were so darn sure of themselves that they would take recourse to police-state tactics to realize their goals, none of which came to be realized at all, despite every promise that this would be good for us. 

It’s the compulsion that’s the source of all the issues. Someone wrote the edicts at someone’s behest. Someone imposed the orders. Those somebodies should be the people who should own the results, compensate the victims, and otherwise accept the consequences for what they have done. 

Who are they? Where are they? Why haven’t they stepped up? 

If you are going to force people to behave a certain way – to close their businesses, kick people out of their homes, stay away from meetings, cancel vacations, physically separate everywhere – you have to be damn certain that it is the right thing to do. If the people who did this were so sure of themselves, why are they so shy to take responsibility? 

The question is pressing: who precisely bears the blame? Not just in general, but more precisely: who was willing to step up from the beginning to say “If this does not work, I accept full responsibility?” Or: “I did this and stand by it.” Or: “I did this and I’m very sorry.” 

So far as I know, no one has said anything like this. 

Instead, what we have is a big jumble of messy bureaucracies, committees, reports, and unsigned orders. There are certain systems in place that seem structured in a way that makes it impossible to find out who precisely is responsible for their design and implementation. 

For example, a friend of mine was being harassed by his school for not being vaccinated. He wanted to speak to the person who imposed the rule. In his investigation, everyone passed the buck. This person put together a committee which then agreed on best practices left over from some other printed guidance approved by another committee, which had been implemented by a similar institution on another matter. This was then adopted by a different division and passed on to another committee for implementation as a recommendation and then it was issued by another division entirely. 

Incredibly, throughout the whole investigation, he failed to find a single person who was willing to step up and say: I did this and it was my decision. Everyone had an alibi. It became one big mush of bureaucracy with no accountability. It’s a tub of dough in which every bad actor pre-built a hiding place. 

It’s the same with many people who have been disemployed for refusing to divulge their vaccine status. Their bosses typically say that they are very sorry for what happened; if it had been up to them, the person would continue to work. Their bosses in turn demur and blame some other policy or committee. No one is willing to speak to victims and say: “I did this and stand by it.”

Like millions of others, I’ve been harmed materially by pandemic response. My story lacks drama and is nothing remotely close to what others have experienced but it is salient because it is personal. I was invited to join in a live studio appearance on TV but then was refused because I refused to divulge my vaccine status. I was sent to a separate studio reserved for the unclean where I sat by myself.

The person who informed me said the policy was stupid and he objected. But it is the company policy. Maybe I can speak to his boss? Oh, he is against this stuff too. Everyone thinks it is dumb. Who then is responsible? The buck is always passed on and up in the chain of command but no one will accept the blame and bear the consequences. 

Even though the courts have repeatedly shot down the vaccine mandates, there is universal consensus that the vaccines, while perhaps offering some private benefits, are not contributing to stopping infections or spread. Which is to say: the only person who might suffer from being unvaccinated is the unvaccinated himself. And yet still, people are losing their jobs, missing out on public life, being segregated and blocked, and otherwise paying a heavy price for not complying. 

And yet there are still people who are intensifying the blame game that blames not government nor public health authorities nor anyone in particular but rather a whole class of people: the evil unvaccinated. 

“I am furious at the unvaccinated,” writes Charles Blow of the New York Times, a paper that kicked off the pro-lockdown propaganda as early as February 27, 2020. “I am not ashamed of disclosing that. I am no longer trying to understand them or educate them. The unvaccinated are choosing to be part of the problem.”

How precisely are the unvaccinated the problem? Because, he writes,“it is possible to control the virus and mitigate its spread, if more people are vaccinated.” 

This is plainly untrue, as we’ve seen from many countries’ experiences around the world. Look up Singapore or Gibraltar or Israel or any high vaxx country and see their case trends. They look the same or worse than low vaxx countries. We know from at least 33 studies that the vaccines cannot and do not stop infection or transmission, which is precisely why Pfizer and people like Anthony Fauci are demanding 3rd and now 4th shots. Shots without end, always with the promise that the next one will achieve the goal. 

Mr. Blow is propagating falsehoods. Why? Because there is an appetite out there to tag someone or something with the fault for the wreckage. The unvaccinated are the scapegoats to distract from the real problem of discovering and holding to account those people who undertook this experiment without precedent. 

The trouble now is finding out who they are. The governor of New York did terrible things but now he has resigned. His brother at CNN propagated lockdown ideology but he was fired. The mayor of New York has perpetrated evil but he is sneaking out of office in a few weeks. Some governors who locked down their populations have declined to run again and will try their best to disappear. 

Dr. Deborah Birx, whom we know for certain was the person who talked Trump into approving lockdowns, quietly resigned and has done her best to avoid the spotlight. The journalist at the New York Times who whipped up total hysteria while calling for brutal lockdown has since been fired from his job. So too for hundreds of public health officials who have resigned or been fired. 

Who is left to blame? The most likely candidate here is Fauci himself. But I can already tell you his excuse. He never signed a single order. His fingerprints are on no legislation. 

He never issued any edicts. He never had anyone arrested. He never blocked the entrance to any church nor personally padlocked any school or business. He is merely a scientist making recommendations supposedly for people’s health. 

He has an alibi too. 

Much of this reminds me of World War I, the “Great War.” Look up the causes. They are all amorphous. Nationalism. An assassination. Treaties. Diplomatic confusions. The Serbs. Meanwhile none of these reasons can actually account for 20 million dead, 21 million wounded, and wrecked economies and lives all over the world, to say nothing of the Great Depression and rise of Hitler that came as a result of this appalling disaster. 

Despite investigations, countless books, public hearings, and public fury that lasted a decade or more after the Great War, there never was anyone who accepted responsibility. We saw a repeat of the same following the Iraq War. Is there any record of anyone who said “I made the decision and I was wrong”?

So it might be for the lockdowns and mandates of 2020 and 2021. The carnage is unspeakable and will last a generation or two or more. Meanwhile, the people responsible are slowly slipping out of public life, finding new jobs and sanitizing their hands of any responsibility. They are scrubbing resumes and, when asked, blaming anyone and everyone else but themselves. 

This is the moment in which we find ourselves: a ruling class terrified of being found out, called out, and held accountable, and therefore incentivized to generate an endless series of excuses, scapegoats, and distractions (“You need another shot!”). 

This is the least satisfying conclusion to this awful story. But there it is: it is very likely that the people who did this to us will never be held accountable, not in any court and not in any legislative hearing. They will never be forced to compensate their victims. They will never even admit they were wrong. And herein lies what might be the most egregious feature of evil public policy: this is not and will not be justice or anything that even vaguely resembles justice. 

That is what history would suggest, in any case. If it is different this time and the perpetrators actually do face some consequences, it would still not make things right, but at least it would set a fabulous precedent for the future.”

We can only hope that the evil ones have been fully mRNA vaxxed up, and enjoy their coming good health in retirement!