The US Covid Death Controversy By Brian Simpson
There are various internet sites noting that one US whistle blower who claims that the official death count from Covid-19 vaccines is way down and more realistically should be 45,000, because usual death rates are from one limited system, and there are others. The lawyers filing a law suit for the whistle blower said that the actual number of deaths exceeds even 45,000! We will be following this one up, since the courts may deal with it, or they may throw it out, unheard, like electoral fraud, or anything else inconvenient. That’s law business, grittier than show business!
“A government related computer programmer, who works in health care data analytics, has made a declaration under penalty of perjury that according to medical claims submitted to the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) there are “at least 45,000” vaccine-related deaths due to experimental COVID-19 vaccine injections.
This dramatic announcement was made earlier this week by Ohio-based attorney Thomas Renz, at Clay Clark's ReAwaken America Tour stop in Anaheim California. Renz remains a lead attorney in several major cases brought against federal agencies relating to fraud and violations of medical freedom rights.
“I’m filing papers in federal court today,” Renz said to the enthusiastic crowd. This filing is “based on a sworn declaration, under threat of perjury,” by a female expert whistleblower who attested “that there have been at least, 45,000 deaths from this vaccine.”
Further, these numbers are “based on how many people died within three days of the vaccine in just one system that is reporting to the federal government.”
Renz continued to explain, “there are reportedly around 11 or 12 systems that are reporting deaths and injuries to the government,” and his own estimation is that the real numbers are “immensely higher” than even the 45,000 deaths, even if he can’t immediately prove it.
According to the full data, of all reporting systems, Renz asked, “how many have really died? And why are they covering it up? These people are murdering people. This is complicity at a minimum. People need to be in jail.”
The filed motion was submitted on behalf of America’s Frontline Doctors (AFLDS) against radically pro-abortion Xavier Becerra, Secretary of the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. It is seeking “a preliminary injunction against Defendants enjoining them from continuing to authorize the emergency use of the so-called [‘vaccines’] ... and from granting full Food and Drug Administration (‘FDA’) approval for the Vaccines” related to the following three groups:
- Those under 18 years of age, who — as stated in an AFLDS press release— “are at statistically 0% risk of death from COVID-19,” while death and injury rates from these “vaccines,” in this demographic, remain, at the very least, highly disproportionate to any supposed benefit.
- All individuals who have recovered from COVID-19: “Natural immunity is superior to manufactured immunity. In addition, the vaccines can trigger a dangerous and deadly hyper-immune response in people with immunity”
- “Every other American who has not yet received informed consent, as defined by Federal law. It is unlawful, and unconstitutional, to administer experimental agents to individuals who cannot make an informed decision as to the true benefits and risks of the vaccines.”
Renz told LifeSiteNews that the testimony of the anonymous whistleblower, referred to in the motion as “Jane Doe,” provides evidence that informed consent is not possible without a full disclosure of the true number of deaths related to experimental COVID-19 gene-therapy vaccine injections.
The filing describes “Jane Doe” as “a computer programmer with subject matter expertise in the healthcare data analytics field, and access to Medicare and Medicaid data maintained by the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS).”
In her actual declaration, “Jane Doe” provides the following testimony:
It is my professional estimate that VAERS (the Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System) database, while extremely useful, is under-reported by a conservative factor of at least 5. On July 9, 2021, there were 9,048 deaths reported in VAERS. I verified these numbers by collating all of the data from VAERS myself, not relying on a third party to report them. In tandem, I queried data from CMS medical claims with regard to vaccines and patient deaths, and have assessed that the deaths occurring within 3 days of vaccination are higher than those reported in VAERS by a factor of at least 5. This would indicate the true number of vaccine-related deaths was at least 45,000.
AFLDS categorized the apparent and significant under-reported deaths as “shocking” and asserted “informed consent, which is required under the law, is impossible when safety data is so misleading.”
It’s also notable, the motion continued, “that in the 1976 Swine Flu vaccine campaign (in which 25% of the U.S. population at that time, 55 million Americans, were vaccinated), the Swine Flu vaccine was deemed dangerous and unsafe, and removed from the market, even though the vaccine resulted in only 53 deaths.”
Veracity of whistleblower testimony
With regards to the veracity of Jan Doe’s legal declaration, Renz emphasized his commitment to ensure his source’s identity is protected explaining that he and his team had “seen a number of things” providing veracity to her conclusions, but he was “not willing to talk about what specifically” because he didn’t feel it was appropriate given his responsibility to protect her identity.
He further explained, “as an attorney, to submit this into federal court, we have to have, legally, a good faith belief that its accurate and correct.”
“We have to do our due diligence, we have to believe that this person is accurate and that these numbers are accurate,” he said. “We very much stand behind what we submitted. We believe it to be correct and accurate. We’ve done our due diligence, and to that extent, I’m quite confident that it will stand up in court.”
For those who might have further doubts, Renz asserted:
This isn’t a hard thing to verify. If the federal government wants to argue about this, if these people want to say that what we’re saying is not true, that’s fine, just let us see the numbers. There’s no reason they can’t open this data up to the public. There’s no reason they can’t share it. And if you don’t have anything to hide, you don’t hide it. So, why are they hiding it?
Renz added that he and his team would welcome the opportunity to clarify the actual numbers and “expect when we do, they will be much higher [than even 45,000].”
AFLDS has updated its own estimate of COVID vaccine related deaths based on Jane Doe’s findings with refreshed data. “As of July 9th, reported deaths in VAERS totaled 10,991,” they said. “The CDC whistleblower [Jane Doe] has made a sworn statement that the actual number of deaths are conservatively five-times higher, meaning as of this date we are approaching at least 55,000 vaccine related deaths.”
Big Tech ‘complicit in causing death’ through censorship
The veracity of such excessively higher actual numbers as compared to what is passively reported on VAERS, is further corroborated by a 2010 Harvard Pilgrim study which found that “fewer than 1% of vaccine injuries” are reported on this system, leading many to conclude, for quite some time, that actual death and injury numbers due to these experimental biological agents are much greater.
Following his announcement in Anaheim, Renz went on to encourage the crowd, and viewers, to become activists and to spread this news everywhere. Also, in the face of Big Tech censorship, he had a message for these large corporations, including Google, YouTube, Facebook and Twitter: “You are complicit in causing death, and I cannot wait to sue you over and over again!”
“Since we can’t talk about the 45,000 murders, because people were not able to give informed consent because they have been covering up the risk, let’s try and get 45,000 to trend on Twitter. We can’t call it ‘murders,’ but maybe [we can get #45K to trend],” he said.
“Grow some spine!” he urged. “Have some courage! Right? Courage! … You have to be willing to fight, and I want to encourage everyone here to have the courage to fight, and to get others involved. They need to hear about this!”
Gutsy, indeed. Are there lawyers like that in Australia?
Comments