The Tangled Web: Unveiling Globalist Connections from Epstein to Davos, By Chris Knight (Florida)

 Coiled in the shadowy corridors of global power, where billionaires, royals, and technocrats mingle, an intricate network of alliances has long shaped the world's direction — often far from the prying eyes of democratic oversight. A recent exposé by Jacob Nordangård in The Pharos Chronicles peels back the layers on this web, spotlighting Jeffrey Epstein's audacious pitch to World Economic Forum (WEF) President Börge Brende: that Davos could "really replace the UN." Drawing on emails, partnerships, and historical ties, Nordangård reveals how globalists interconnect through elite clubs, strategic dinners, and ideological synergies, pushing for a techno-corporate order that sidelines traditional governance.

At the heart of this narrative is Epstein's 2018 email to Brende, sent just before UN Week: "Davos can really replace the UN. C21, cyber, crypto . genetics. .. intl coordination." Brende's enthusiastic reply—"Exactly - we need a new global architecture. World Economic Forum (Davos) is uniquely positioned - public private" — lays bare a vision where the WEF, with its annual Davos gatherings of the ultra-wealthy, steps in as a more efficient hub for global coordination. This wasn't idle chatter; nine months later, in June 2019, Brende and WEF founder Klaus Schwab inked a strategic partnership with UN Secretary-General António Guterres and Deputy Amina J. Mohammed. The deal aimed to "accelerate the implementation of the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development," harnessing Fourth Industrial Revolution technologies like AI, biotech, and digital currencies. It's a classic globalist move: blending public institutions with private might to drive agendas that sound benevolent — sustainability, innovation — but often consolidate control in unelected hands.

These pacts don't emerge in a vacuum; they're woven from decades of overlapping networks. Epstein, before his 2008 arrest, was embedded in elite circles like David Rockefeller's Trilateral Commission, the Council on Foreign Relations, and the Rockefeller University board. In his last interview with Steve Bannon, Epstein recalled Rockefeller's philosophy: businessmen, not politicians with their fleeting terms, are the "most important people to have stability and consistency." This echoes the globalist ethos — prioritising long-term corporate vision over electoral whims. The Trilateral Commission, founded by Rockefeller in 1973, has long advocated for tri-continental (U.S., Europe, Asia) cooperation among elites, a blueprint that feeds into modern forums like Davos.

Nordangård spotlights Norway as a microcosm of these ties, where diplomacy, royalty, and scandal intersect. Brende, a former Norwegian Foreign Minister and Bilderberg Steering Committee member, dined at Epstein's New York townhouse the very evening of the UN-WEF signing, courtesy of Norwegian diplomat Terje Rød-Larsen. Rød-Larsen, who resigned amid Epstein revelations, was linked to Epstein through his wife, Mona Juul, Norway's UN Ambassador. Norwegian royals add another layer: Crown Princess Mette-Marit (a 2010 Young Global Leader, or YGL, via WEF) met Epstein multiple times, while Crown Prince Haakon (YGL 2005 and board member) attended the 2011 Bilderberg meeting in St. Moritz — referenced in an email between Epstein and Lord Peter Mandelson. These aren't random encounters; they're facilitated by shared memberships in groups like Bilderberg (a secretive annual confab of power brokers) and the WEF's YGL program, which grooms emerging leaders like Mohammed herself, who served on its board.

This web extends to tech titans reshaping the game. Peter Thiel, Palantir chairman and Bilderberg regular since around 2005 (invited by Henry Kissinger), backed Donald Trump's rise, ushering in an era of "Techno Kings." Trump's "Board of Peace," unveiled at Davos with WEF trustees like Ajay Banga and former trustee Tony Blair, hints at bypassing the UN through mechanisms in the UN's Pact for the Future, including an "emergency platform" for crisis response without interference. It's a seamless fusion: Epstein's crypto-genetics-cyber trifecta aligns with WEF's push for digital IDs, blockchain governance, and biotech revolutions, all under the guise of progress.

What binds these globalists isn't just cocktail parties or board seats — it's a shared ideology of transcending outdated structures. Nordangård argues this borders on hubris, akin to "replacing God" with technology and elite coordination. The UN, born from post-WWII idealism, is seen as sclerotic; Davos offers a sleek alternative where public-private partnerships dictate terms. Yet this raises alarms: when businessmen like Rockefeller or Thiel advocate for "consistency," it often means insulating power from democratic disruption. Epstein's involvement underscores the moral hazards — his scandals didn't sever ties until exposed, revealing how networks protect their own while preaching global good.

In essence, globalists connect through a multilayered ecosystem: historical clubs like Trilateral and Bilderberg for strategy, modern platforms like WEF and YGL for recruitment, and strategic partnerships like WEF-UN for execution. Emails become blueprints, dinners seal deals, and technologies like cyber and genetics promise a New World Order. But as Nordangård warns, this "new global architecture" risks eroding sovereignty, prioritising elite stability over human freedoms. In a world racing toward AI and biotech dominance, understanding these threads isn't paranoia — it's essential for navigating the power plays that shape our future. If Davos truly replaces the UN, who benefits? Not the billions outside the club, that's for sure.