The Social Disease of Public Health By Brian Simpson

As will be detailed in other articles at this blog, doctors, since the Covid plandemic have fallen in public popularity, as with nurses. It is not surprising given the compliance with the dictates of the regime. While regulatory agencies have made sure that there will be no criticism of the vax from doctors, and those few that have spoken out have been deregistered of investigated, most doctors have a comfortable relationship with Big Pharma, and were happy advocates, if not enthusiastic true-believers in the black magic of Big Pharma. It is difficult to see how, if justice ever prevails, they would get their lawful and just punishment, as there are just so many of the guilty.

However, beyond the doctors, is the public health system itself, which, as argued below in a hard-hitting Brownstone.org piece, has become “cancerous,” at least in a social sense. Included in this is organisations at the top of the rotting tree, such as the World Health Organization, which has shown itself to be little more than a mirror of CCP health policies. Indeed, WHO was hesitant to even investigate fully the lab leak hypothesis of Covid-19’s origin, back before it all became a cold case. The proposed Pandemic Treaty, coming up in May this year, gives this corrupt organisation the power to dictate health policies during the next plandemic, is utterly frightening, given that WHO will push for compulsory vaccination, and given what is known about the adverse effects of the mRNA gene therapies, called “vaccines.”

https://brownstone.org/articles/the-cancer-that-is-public-health/

“Sometimes an institution or movement turns on the society that supports it, harming the whole for its own benefit. A public bureaucracy can forget its underlying purpose and focus on perpetuating itself, or an organization comes to believe that the rest of society owes it special privileges. When an organ within the body of society becomes thus corrupted, and proves itself unwilling to reform, society must excise the diseased tissue before it spreads.

Cancer and its causes

Cancer starts when cells within an organ begin to operate outside the strictures and rules that the body’s cells were programmed to follow. This can be triggered by environmental factors such as chemicals, radiation, or viral infections. It can also occur due to structural errors in the DNA that determine the body’s growth and function.

Immune mechanisms often control and eliminate early cancerous change, with the person remaining unaware that there was even a threat. Sometimes however, the cancerous change is too great for these inbuilt checks to overcome. Its growth is beyond what the body was designed to address, or the body has become so sickened by age, attack or neglect that it can no longer mount an adequate defense.

As a cancer grows, it slowly corrupts the organ it arose within, impairing or changing its function. Demanding more nourishment to support its own rapid growth, it saps the body’s ability to support the rest of its billions of cells. In time the whole body deteriorates, though the cancer continues to grow and extract nourishment to the end, effectively repurposing the body solely towards its own support.

Death may be averted by removing the offending cancer, or even the entire organ from which it arose. But if the organ is vital to survival or the cancer has infiltrated other vital organs, excision is not possible. Sometimes the cancer may be poisoned or killed with radiation or immunotherapy without killing the entire body. But if it cannot be so dealt with, it takes the entire body down with it. This is a relatively common way to die.

Society is in many ways like the human body. Its various organs perform their functions to support the whole, all interdependent for survival. Corruption of one organ will, if left unchecked, corrupt the whole body. Most societal organs have rules that keep them in line with society’s needs. When external influences poison or degrade them and these rules are broken, the organ grows to the detriment of the whole. If society is healthy, it may be able to reform or replace the offending organ. If it is not, or if the corruption has infiltrated too deeply, society will become increasingly sick as its lifeblood is sucked away, and in time it may die.

A cancer on society

The international public health sector comprises the World Health Organization (WHO), a growing bevy of other international health agencies and numerous non-governmental organizations and foundations. Ostensibly its role is to support global society in maintaining overall health. By WHO’s definition, health is the ‘physical, mental and social wellbeing’ of all people, in equal measure. For reasons of promoting equality and human rights, the sector focuses on populations in low-income countries where life expectancies are lower and resources most limited. Various rules on conflict of interest, together with the traditional unprofitability of poor people’s healthcare, had once kept the private sector mostly uninvolved and uninterested. WHO’s lifeblood funding was restricted to assessed national contributions of its Member States.

Over the past two decades, the growth of mass vaccination has provided a viable way to extract profit from the healthcare of these low-income populations. Reflecting this, private interests and corporations have become keen to fund WHO’s work. These sources follow a ‘directed funding’ model through which they specify how and where their sponsorship will be used. Private money and corporate direction also heavily influence new organizations set up in parallel including Gavi and CEPI, focused on supplying commodities from which these sponsors profit. This has changed international health from a horizontal, country- and community-driven approach to a vertically-driven commodity-based model.

While the international public health sector is still heavily dependent on taxpayer funding, the funding of corporations and their investors has won them great influence over this increasingly commoditized agenda. Public funding thereby shifts wealth from the average taxpayer to the wealthy who have invested in these goods. An organ nourished by and designed to support the whole has been repurposed by these external influences into acting like a cancer on society, still fed by the body but directed to its own benefit.

Cancerous growths sicken the body

If this cancer analogy seems a stretch when applied to the ‘humanitarian’ sector, it is instructive to review recent history. In 2019, after a structured process laid out for guideline development, WHO published their guidelines for pandemic influenza. These specifically state that contact tracing, border closures and quarantining of well individuals should not occur during an established pandemic. At most, sick people could be confined at home for 7-10 days. School closures, if used, should be short-term. Restrictive measures, as WHO noted, would not significantly reduce mortality but would disproportionately harm low-income people and raise major ethical and human rights concerns.

A few months after publishing these guidelines, senior WHO executives recommended restrictive measures far beyond those that their own guidelines had warned against. To appreciate the gravity of the harms inflicted on the billions of people in low-income countries, we must understand that those orchestrating them knew that these populations were at very low risk from Covid-19 itself. 

The massive skewing of Covid mortality towards old age was published in the Lancet in early 2020. More than half of the 1.3 billion people in sub-Saharan Africa are under 20 years of age and therefore at near-zero risk, whilst less than 1% are over 75 years. The average age of Covid-associated deaths in Western countries is about 80 years.

The WHO, CEPI, Gavi and other public health organizations knew that rapid health service access and good nutrition are fundamental to reducing child mortality. They knew that infant mortality in low-income countries is strongly tied to gross domestic product (GDP) and therefore harming economies would kill millions (which it is, with UNICEF noting over 200,000 lockdown deaths in South Asia in 2020 alone). 

In advocating for measures to restrict health service access and disrupt supply lines, they knowingly caused an immediate and sustained increase in malaria, pneumonia and other acute infectious disease. By restricting access to tuberculosis and HIV care, the death rate of those already infected would increase whilst also promoting transmission, locking in greater future mortality. These diseases kill at a far younger average age than Covid. 

Recommendations to close workplaces in cities left millions of workers in the same crowded living conditions as before, but with no income to buy food and medicine for their families. Closure of markets further reduced access to nutrition, whilst also reducing farm earnings. Knowing the importance of tourism to the service and retail industries that support millions of women’s education and independence, advocacy to block international travel further impoverished these people.

It is well accepted that education is key to escaping future poverty. Prolonged school closures removed formal education from hundreds of millions of children. Tens of millions never returned, child labor increased, and millions of additional girls have been consigned to child marriage and nightly rape. The undermining of African and South Asian education will increase poverty and inequality among these populations for the next couple of generations. 

Since mid-2021, WHO, UNICEF (an agency formerly dedicated to child health) and various partners have continued to push for mass vaccination of 70 percent of low-income country populations through the COVAX program. This program cannot provide significant public health benefit as most African people are less than 20 years of age, WHO has shown that most Africans had broad effective post-infection immunity by late 2021, and mass use of these vaccines does not substantially reduce transmission. It does, however, divert financial and human resources from programs addressing other diseases. As COVAX costs more than the annual budgets allocated to diseases such as malaria, tuberculosis and HIV, with higher and growing burdens in these populations, we can be confident that it will cost more lives through diverted resources than it can possibly save.

Can the rot be removed?

It is hard to explain these actions without the conclusion that the health sector has turned against the body that it was intended to serve. Private and corporate sponsors greatly increased wealth through these harms for which the public health sector advocated, and they continue to do so. There was a time when profiteering through the impoverishment and debasement of the majority would have been recognized as a cancer and treated accordingly. The COVID-19 response has found the body of society unable to react against such corruption within one of its most important organs.

Is it still possible for society to mount an effective response? This cancer of conflicted interests has infiltrated far beyond public health; the media and governments have been dutifully trotting off to the Davos club for years. Whilst the functions of international health appear to be leading the degradation of society, the sector itself seeks to grow at an unprecedented rate. Let us hope, for all our sakes, that the rest of society can recognize the rot within, and find the strength to cut it out before it drags us all down. We cannot let those fueling this rot destroy what so many worked so hard to build.”