As Steve Kirsch says, from viewing attorney Robert Barnes who is  going up against Pfizer in a fraud case, a defence has been raised to Pfizer fraud claims, that it was not fraud because they cooperated with the government, which is true. However, is that a defence to fraud? Unless certain legislation protects them, which I doubt in this instance, all it means is the Pfizer and the government are joint partners in the enterprise. It is like a murderer arguing that he is not responsible for murder, from shooting a victim, as his partner in crime fired a hitting shot too.  But, we will see where this goes, the attorney Robert Barnes, seems confident, which is a good sign.

https://rumble.com/v18ie08-attorney-robert-barnes-who-represents-brook-jacksons-case-against-pfizer.html

https://stevekirsch.substack.com/p/pfizer-admits-to-fraud-in-court?s=r

“Pfizer admits to fraud in court

Their defense to the fraud claims against them is that because the government was in on it, it isn't fraud. Pfizer whistle-blower Brook Jackson's attorney, Robert Barnes, isn't buying the argument.

You really can’t make this stuff up. You gotta watch this video… it’s only 2 minutes. And it will be a key piece of evidence in my next move which you’ll learn about shortly.

In a nutshell, Pfizer admits in court to fraud, but says it isn’t fraud because the government was in on it. I bet you never heard that defense before.”