The Need for Nuclear Missiles By James Reed
That Australia never acquired nuclear missiles in the 1950s during the British nuclear tests on “our” soil, when the nuclear age dawned, but instead went with the Fabian socialist anti-Anglo Saxon immigration replacement ideology of “populate or perish,” as if people somehow countered technology, is a disgrace. It will be extremely difficult now for Australia to get nuclear anything, let alone missiles. Consider that both India and Pakistan have nuclear missiles, but we have … nothing, consistent with our status as a slave nation. As hard as it is to accept, our goose may well be cooked in the world of coming high tech war. All of this should have been fought by our leaders in the 1950s and 1960s while there was still a chance. But, hobbies got in the way, as hobbies and dreams still do. Don’t blame me for oblivion, I have issued warnings enough over the decade and a half of active writing. My conscience is clear, clean … at least of this!
“Bringing an end to what was a prior policy of three decades of gradual disarmament, Britain will expand its nuclear arsenal by over 40%, according to a planned announcement by Prime Minister Boris Johnson on Tuesday.
Lifting the cap will mark the biggest shift since the Cold War, which Foreign Secretary Dominic Raab has said is needed as "the ultimate insurance policy" amid a more risky global environment filled with advancing technological and more sophisticated threats from hostile actors.
Outlining the rationale for such a dramatic ramping up in nuclear arms, Raab explained, "Because over time as the circumstances change and the threats change, we need to maintain a minimum credible level of deterrent."
"Why? Because it is the ultimate guarantee, the ultimate insurance policy against the worst threat from hostile states."
And PM Johnson said, "This will demonstrate to our allies, in Europe and beyond, that they can always count on the UK when it really matters."
It was first reported in The Guardian on Monday, which obtained a leaked copy of the government's over 100-page Integrated Review which details plans for a new pivot towards Asia as well as a strategy for countering Russia. But most controversially it lays out the lifting of nuclear caps, portending a potential new Cold War scenario involving Russia, China, and the West, as The Guardian reveals:
The increased limit, from 180 to 260 warheads, is contained in a leaked copy of the integrated review of defence and foreign policy, seen by the Guardian. It paves the way for a controversial £10bn rearmament in response to perceived threats from Russia and China.
The review also warns of the "realistic possibility" that a terrorist group will "launch a successful CBRN [chemical, biological, radiological or nuclear] attack by 2030", although there is little extra detail to back up this assessment.
Specifically, the document cites the "evolving security environment" and "developing range of technological and doctrinal threats" as making it necessary to bolster the UK's nuclear arsenal.
The UK's nuclear deterrent is currently maintained via four nuclear-armed submarines, with at least one of these remaining armed and on patrol at all times.”
If Britain has the need for a nuclear deterrent, then so does Australia.
Comments