The More Vaxxes, the Greater the Risk of Covid Infection By Brian Simpson

While the mantra of the “safe and effective” has been made constantly throughout the Covid plandemic, the tide has certainly turned on this. It is still possible to  find Australian health authorities still pushing the line that the Covid vaxxes stop transmission, so get your fifth jab. A friend who is medical is getting her sixth, but does not see in any way her multitude of ill-health being vaxxed related, of course. Yet a Cleveland Clinic study, linked below showed that the bivalent Covid vax used as a booster was only 30 percent effective, but, the more vaxxes one had, the greater the chance of a Covid infection!  "The association of increased risk of COVID-19 with higher numbers of prior vaccine doses in our study was unexpected." Indeed, and this research was within the mainstream vaccination paradigm, as well. Naturally, the study was given the memory hole treatment.

https://www.trialsitenews.com/a/bombshell-revisitlarge-cleveland-clinic-study-reveals-higher-of-vax-doses-greater-risk-for-sars-cov-2-infection-e732fa7e

“A Cleveland Clinic study presented to the world at the end of 2022 received little attention, yet its results were provocative, to say the least. Importantly, the study results were uploaded to the preprint server, meaning they were never peer-reviewed, which partially explains the lack of attention. Led by staff infectious disease physician Nabin Shrestha, M.D., and physician-scientist colleagues at the prestigious Cleveland, Ohio health integrated health system, the team studied the cumulative incidence of COVID-19 over the weeks after employees at Cleveland Clinic received the bivalent COVID-19 vaccine. As reported by TrialSite, this version of the product designed to target both the Wuhan (index) strain and Omicron BA.4/BA.5 is now the only COVID-19 vaccine available despite the fact the prevailing variants have changed due to mutation and evolution. Studying the incidence of COVID-19 after vaccination, the study's authors sought to better understand the protective powers of the bivalent BA.4/BA.5 product in 51,011 Cleveland Clinic healthcare employees, conducting time-dependent covariant analysis, adjusted for the pandemic phase when the last prior COVID-19 episode occurred, plus the number of vaccine doses received. They report that the bivalent COVID-19 vaccine used as a booster was modestly effective—at 30% in preventing infection during the time that the targeted SARS-CoV-2 strains were predominant in circulation. But the bombshell finding which is supported by other studies—the more mRNA vaccine doses received, the higher the risk of COVID-19 infection.

It's no wonder the media stayed away from this study result, given the author's declaration: "The association of increased risk of COVID-19 with higher numbers of prior vaccine doses in our study was unexpected." While the authors try to offer explanations, they are speculative. They cannot be certain why this was the result. Of course, in all fairness, the mRNA vaccines have, at least in surges, reduced severe symptomatic COVID-19 but a product associated with more risk of infection isn't considered high quality.”

https://www.medrxiv.org/content/10.1101/2022.12.17.22283625v5

 

 

Comments

No comments made yet. Be the first to submit a comment
Already Registered? Login Here
Wednesday, 13 November 2024

Captcha Image