The Military Option Given SCOTUS’ Gutlessness: General Flynn for President By Charles Taylor
John F. Kennedy famously said, “Those who make peaceful revolution impossible will make violent revolution inevitable.” We have the hear say evidence of the Chief Justice totally whimping out and doing what we all expected, screaming in fear at the other justices that to recognise the law in the electoral fraud situation would lead the Left to riot. So much for the rule of law.
https://www.takimag.com/article/voter-fraud-never-happens-except-in-these-10000-cases/
“Rep. Matt Patrick, a Texas Congressman from District 32 just shared some shocking news
He took to C-Span, where he told a disturbing story about the recent Texas case that went before the SCOTUS.
As you know, the justices refused to hear the case, with only Alito and Thomas dissenting.
But Rep. Patrick said it was a lot more dramatic than just your usual “no” vote.
Rep Patrick says he spoke to a SCOTUS staffer who claims to have overheard a “screaming match” take place in the room where the justices gather to discuss cases.
The staffer said the always-quiet room erupted in shouting, and this staffer says they overheard Justice Roberts say, “I don’t give a f**k about Bush v Gore, at that time we didn’t have riots.”
Of course, this was denied, but it is one of those things that seemingly could not but be true, given the state of the legal system.
Then there are the claims that the chief justice might have a few little secrets. But really, they don’t need this to cuck out, it comes easy.
“On Thursday, Donald Trump and QAnon supporting attorney Lin Wood posted a series of tweets attacking Chief Justice John Roberts in the wake of the Supreme Court's decision to throw out yet another bid to overturn the election results.
Among some of the tweets posted by Wood, who has an abbreviation of the QAnon slogan "where he go one we go all" in his Twitter bio, included an unsubstantiated claim that Roberts had a phone call last year with Justice Stephen Breyer suggesting that he would "make sure" Trump lost the election.
Wood also repeated suggestions that Roberts has links to Jeffrey Epstein, who died by suicide in his jail cell in August 2019.”
It might be time for Trump to start declassifying everything on the Epstein saga.
https://www.naturalnews.com/2020-12-19-petition-asks-president-trump-implement-insurrection-act.html
“Retired Lt. Gen. Michael Flynn said Thursday that President Donald Trump has options regarding the hotly contested presidential election, including seizing voting machines and using “military capabilities” to rerun the election in key battleground states.
Flynn, who is a supporter of Trump’s claims of election fraud, told Newsmax in an interview that while he doesn’t know if the president will pursue these options, he said Trump needs to “plan for every eventuality because we cannot allow this election and the integrity of our election to go the way it is.”
“He could immediately, on his order, seize every single one of these machines around the country, on his order. He could also order, within the swing states, if he wanted to, he could take military capabilities and he could place them in those states and basically rerun an election in each of those states. It’s not unprecedented,” Flynn told the outlet.
He also clarified his position around the imposition of martial law, saying he isn’t calling for it, noting that “we have a constitutional process … that has to be followed.”
At the same time, he expressed concern about the U.S. Supreme Court, presumably in the context of its refusal to hear a contest-of-election lawsuit brought by Texas, which the high court dismissed on grounds of lack of standing.
“I’m a little concerned about Chief Justice John Roberts at the Supreme Court,” Flynn said. “We can’t fool around with the fabric of the Constitution of the United States.”
Yes, time for treason trials.
https://www.theepochtimes.com/president-trump-declassify-everything-everything_3621630.html
https://www.naturalnews.com/2020-12-18-situation-update-dec-18th-cyber-red-dawn.html
“A new petition on the official White House website is asking that the administration declare that an insurrection exists, calling for the establishment of a military tribunal to take over the country.
The petition calls for the White House to invoke the Insurrection Act of 1807 which empowers the President of the United States to deploy the military and federalized National Guard troops within the U.S. in particular circumstances to suppress civil disorder, insurrection and rebellion.
“It is evident to all objective observers that our election system has been irredeemably corrupted …,” states the petition.
Petition comes as biggest legal challenge to the election fails
The petition comes after the Supreme Court rejected a Texas lawsuit that sought to throw out the results of the Nov. 3 election in four states: Georgia, Michigan, Pennsylvania and Wisconsin.
The suit was filed by Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton and had been joined by 17 other states that voted for President Donald Trump. It relied on a statistical analysis that claimed that Joe Biden could not have possibly received 7 million more votes than Trump, and as such, sought to have the election results from those four states decertified.
Trump had called the suit “the big one,” and 126 of the 196 Republicans in the House also called on the court to take it. But justices acted swiftly to turn it down.
“Texas has not demonstrated a judicially cognizable interest in the manner in which another state conducts its elections,” the court stated in a brief unsigned opinion.
According to Justices Samuel Alito and Clarence Thomas, the court had no authority to refuse a case filed on its original docket, where one state files to sue another. But the justices said that they would not grant Texas any other relief and expressed no view on any of the issues the lawsuit raised.
In response to the case being thrown out, Trump tweeted that “The Supreme Court really let us down.”
“No Wisdom, No Courage!” he added.
Meanwhile, Texas AG Paxton said that he would continue to stand by the allegations raised by the suit.
“I will continue to tirelessly defend the integrity and security of our elections and hold accountable those who shirk established election law for their own convenience.”
But the odds against similar suits being filed and making it through are even slimmer now that the Electoral College has cast its votes.
“I think the answer is that the court challenges are pretty well done,” said John Fortier, an election law expert at the Bipartisan Policy Center in Washington.
Insurrection Act may be last resort if all legal challenges fail
With the legal challenges to the election being rejected by courts around the country, the insurrection act may be seen by the petitioners as a last resort to overturn what they see as a fraudulent election.
The last time the act had been called was in May of 1992 when California requested that then-President George H. W. Bush implement it in the face of the 1992 Los Angeles riots.
The last time the act had been implemented in relation to an election was in 1872. But at that time, then-President Ulysses S. Grant had implemented the act to enforce the result of an election – that of Republican gubernatorial candidate William Pitt Kellogg – after civil unrest broke out in Louisiana.
This isn’t the first time that the Insurrection Act has come up this year. In early Summer, Trump had threatened to use it to take military action in American cities that had been rocked by riots following the death of George Floyd.
More importantly, this year also saw the act amended to expanded the instances in which the president may invoke the law. The new wording allows the President to “employ the armed forces during a natural disaster or terrorist attack.””
Comments