The Great Temperature Hoax: How COP30's Climate Scares Ignore 600 Million Years of Data and Why the "Climate Crisis" is Just Hot Air! By Brian Simpson
As the Belém sun beats down on COP30's elite attendees – who jetted in on private wings while bulldozing Amazon trees for their limo lane – the next two weeks promise a barrage of recycled terror. Expect endless loops on the "1.5°C threshold" doomsday, "tipping points" unleashing biblical floods, and every hurricane pinned on your gas-guzzler. These aren't science; they're scare tactics propping up the hard-Left's Net Zero fantasy – a trillion-dollar grift taxing the poor to fund windmill cronies and "reparations" for socialist dictators. But strip away the hysteria, and the foundation crumbles: Global temperatures aren't spiralling into apocalypse. They've fluctuated wildly for eons, often without a whisper from CO2. The real controversy? Politicians and "experts" have buried the evidence to sell the scam.
Don't buy the narrative. Over 600 million years, temperature and CO2 diverge like exes at a reunion. Recent "hottest ever" spikes? Blame volcanoes like Hunga Tonga (2022) and El Niño, not your SUV. Satellite data even shows cooling in 2025. This deep dive exposes the temperature controversy: A tale of junk models, cancelled dissent, and records screaming "business as usual."
The alarmist pitch: Humans have jacked CO2, spiking temperatures to unprecedented heights, breaching "safe" limits and triggering chaos. Reality check: Global warming since 1800 is ~1°C (adjusting for urban heat islands and dodgy proxies), a snail's pace compared to history. Medieval Warm Period? Temps matched or exceeded today's. Roman era? Warmer still. Holocene Climax (8,000-5,000 years ago)? 3-4°C hotter, with CO2 stuck at a starvation-level 260 ppm.
Michael Mann's infamous "hockey stick" graph? It airbrushed those warm spells to flog the flatline-then-spike myth. But proxies – ice cores, tree rings, sediments – tell a different story: Abrupt shifts are normal. Dansgaard-Oeschger (DO) events? 1,500-year cycles yanking Greenland temps 10-15°C in decades, etched in ice for 150 million years back to the Jurassic.
French scientists led by Sorbonne's Slah Boulila crunched global records: These DO-like jolts hit both hemispheres, oceans, and continents – not just northern ice wobbles. Up to 15°C jumps in decades? That's not "unprecedented"; it's Earth's playlist on repeat. Recent "hottest ever" records? Hunga Tonga's 2022 blast hurled 150 Tg of water vapour – a potent greenhouse gas – into the stratosphere, juicing 2023-24 spikes by 0.1-0.2°C, amplified by El Niño. Now, satellites show reversal: UAH data logs a 2025 cooldown, post-El Niño fade.
The linchpin: CO2 drives temperatures they suppose. But zoom out to Phanerozoic eon (600M years)? No dice. Graphs show wild divergences: Ice ages with CO2 >4,000 ppm (Ordovician), hothouse worlds with low CO2. Dinosaurs thrived at 1,000+ ppm – temperatures ~7°C warmer, biomass booming. Today's 420 ppm? A CO2 famine; plants love the bump – crop yields up 20-30% since 1980, famine averted.
Saturation explains it: CO2's warming effect logs off past ~300 ppm – like adding blankets to a sauna. Lags? Sometimes CO2 trails temps (ice melt releases it); sometimes leads. Boulila's work: Cycles tie to orbital wobbles, not emissions. Recent "lockstep"? Cherry-picked post-1950 data. Widen to millennia: CO2 flat during Medieval warmth.
1.5°C? Political fiction from IPCC politburos, not physics – a "threshold" to guilt-trip trillions into green slush funds. Tipping points? Computer fairy tales: Warm corals "doomed" at 1.5°C? They've endured 300M years at 24-32°C swings. Attribution – "This storm's your fault"? Untestable pseudoscience, blaming hydrocarbons for events routine in cooler eras.
COP30's scares aren't evidence; they're enforcement. Dissent? "Denialism." Proxies debunked, satellites "adjusted," models tuned to doomsday. Hunga Tonga's vapour plume – a natural greenhouse bomb – explains 2023 heat, yet crickets from alarmists. 2025 cooling? Buried.
This isn't science; it's suppression. Elites build "new systems" on lies: Demonise CO2 (Earth's fertiliser), catastrophise 1°C wiggles, attribute chaos to capitalism. Net Zero? Fantasy impoverishing billions for elite yachts.
Sceptics aren't deniers – we're data-driven. Temperatures fluctuate; time to unplug the fear machine, and for nations like Australia to abandon zero net and the anti-fossil fuel mania.

Comments