The Great Replacement Only Exists if the Elites Celebrate it, Otherwise - Racist Conspiracy! By Charles Taylor (Florida)

James Kirkpatrick has two tremendous articles detailing the elites’ response to the thesis of the Great Replacement or white genocide, the idea that there is a grand plan to demographically replace whites by mass migration. In short, there is ample evidence that the ruling elites, the 1 percenters and above, support this, and have organised it, probably as an act of revenge in their minds, but mainly to create their idea of a slave society. The notion is that they will rule unchallenged for eternity, when in fact this diversity is already destroying the West. Until they can live in outer space, or maybe under the oceans, or even deep underground, the elites are stuck in the mess that they are creating. Yet, full of hubris, they will not back down until the bitter end, and bitter it will be. South Africa will be like a Sunday school picnic compared to the economic and cultural collapse of the West.

https://vdare.com/articles/sen-wendy-rogers-new-gingrich-notice-the-great-replacement-leftists-freak-out-only-dems-can-do-that

“The “marketplace of ideas” of the classical liberal imagination has been replaced by something close to an ideological ration system, and nowhere is this truer than on issues of race and immigration. Approved persons are allowed to have opinions. Others are not, despite citing the same set of facts.  This has long been true for the War On Christmas and now it’s true for the Great Replacement. The question: can what passes for the American Right build an effective response now that at least some of their leaders are beginning to see what’s happening.

Recently, Arizona state senator Wendy Rogers made the obvious point that mass immigration is about replacing the existing American population.

Of course, this led to Regime Media hysteria and demands for apologies. There was no pretense at debate. The argument from corporate journalism was simply that you can’t Notice this or else you want to kill people.

• “The language is the same used by those who promote the ‘Great Replacement Theory.’ That idea, popular among white supremacists, holds that white Americans are being replaced by immigrants – GOP Sen. Wendy Rogers defends her promotion of racist ‘great replacement’ ideology, by Jerod MacDonald-Evoy, AZMirror, July 20, 2021
• “After linking to an article about immigration on Twitter, Rogers then posted, ‘We are being replaced and invaded.’ The language of that tweet bears a striking similarity to a racist conspiracy known as the ‘Great Replacement Theory.’ [Executive director for the Jewish Relations Council of Greater Phoenix] Paul] Rockowner said the theory is rooted in the idea that white people are being replaced by nonwhite immigrants and has inspired mass killings worldwide” [Republican state senator accused of promoting racist conspiracy, by Dennis Welch, AZFamily, July 21, 2021]
• Wendy Rogers sounds the alarm to white supremacists. This is gross, even for her, by Laurie Roberts, AZCentral, July 20, 2021

The use of “gross” to describe an opinion (one is reminded of Ben Affleck reacting to Sam Harris and Bill Maher criticizing militant Islam) shows that the “disgust” reaction may not actually be stronger among conservatives, as some research has claimed [Conservatives are more easily disgusted than liberals, by Yoel Inbar, David Pizarro, and Paul Bloom, Cognition & Emotion, Volume 23, 2009]. Liberals simply associate it with different things. The case against the state senator was not that she was factually wrong. It was simply that the point sounded something like what other people said.

And if merely talking about demographic issues leads to “violence,” then the moral guilt of every crime that has been arguably incited against whites should be on the conscience of the journalists, NGOs, and politicians who have been stoking anti-white hate.

In fact, of course, the “Great Replacement” concept itself has been repeatedly invoked by Leftists when cheering on the process. The latest example: Senator Dick Durbin, (D.-IL)  who did it late last month.

“The demographics of America are not on the side of the Republican Party. The new voters in this country are moving away from them, away from Donald Trump, away from their party creed that they preach.”

The facts of the Great Replacement are not in dispute, it’s just a question of whether you think that the demographic (and thus political) transformation is a good thing or a bad thing. Michael Anton has termed this the “Celebration Parallax,” the Left’s denial that something is happening until it is too late, at which point it is defended as something that was morally necessary [Michael Anton Convinced Me To Vote For Trump Like America Depends On It, by Joe Allen, The Federalist, October 30, 2020].

The same sort of political sleight-of-hand occurred with the 1965 Immigration Act, arguably the most important piece of legislation passed in American society. It was pushed through amid promises that it wasn’t a big deal.

Specifically, Senator Durbin was talking about demographics while speaking against rules that could secure clean elections, arguing that “new voters” would doom the Republican party [Video: Dick Durbin Endorses Great Replacement, Says ‘Demographics’ Are ‘Not On The Side Of The Republican Party,’ by Gabriel Keane, National File, July 19, 2021]. He wants to make sure those voting requirements are as lenient as possible so those “new voters” can be shoved into the polls (or at least mail in the ballot.)

The word choice of “new voters” is significant. Senator Durbin is fully aware that demographic transformation is a policy choice driven by political considerations, as VDARE.com Editor Peter Brimelow showed decades ago. It’s the Republican leadership who remain clueless about its consequences.

However, that may not be true of the Republican base.

Consider Newt Gingrich. Gingrich is responsible for many of our current problems, including the survival of Affirmative Action and mass immigration, both ignored in his celebrated  “Contract With America.” At worst, Newt worked with the Left to protect multiculturalism. At best, he failed to act when America could still have been saved without drastic change.

Nonetheless, Newt Gingrich today needs to retain a certain amount of credibility with the Republican base, if only so he’ll remain relevant and worth booking on television. Thus, even if he’s being entirely cynical and just wants to keep the Fox News crowd on board, it’s significant that he recently said—

The anti-American Left would love to drown traditional, classic Americans with as many people as they can who know nothing of American history, nothing of American tradition, nothing of the rule of law... When you go and look at the radical Left, this is their ideal model. It’s to get rid of the rest of us because we believe in George Washington, or we believe in the Constitution. 

[Gingrich on Border: Anti-American Left’s Ideal Model Is To “Get Rid Of The Rest Of Us, by Ian Schwartz, RealClearPolitics, August 4, 2021]

Naturally the same smears used against Senator Wendy Rogers were immediately mobilized for Newt:

• [Newt Gingrich: The left wants “to get rid of the rest of us because we believe in George Washington, Gingrich appears to embrace the racist ‘Great Replacement’ conspiracy during a Fox Business interview, by Brett Bachman, Salon, August 4, 2021]
• [Newt Gingrich Goes Full ‘Great Replacement Theory’ on Fox, by Corbin Bolies, Daily Beast, August 5, 2021]
• [Republican spreads conspiracy theory on Fox about immigrants ‘replacing us,’ by Kate Plummer, Indy100, August 4, 2021]

As the Left reverts to magical thinking, we can expect more of this kind of reaction. It’s as if they think “The Great Replacement” is an occult phrase that might unleash dark powers.

And perhaps there’s something to that. If Americans Notice what is being done to them through immigration policy, they may want their leaders to do something about it.

Remember, the Left is pushing Critical Race Theory. It is explicitly trying to dispossess what Newt calls “traditional, classic Americans” (whom we would simply call the Historic American Nation). Indeed, the Left is essentially a coalition of people who hate whites as such, not just the American nation-state. It’s hard to determine what modern Progressivism is other than just hating whites:

• Why would you import illegals during a pandemic unless your hatred for the existing population superseded all other concerns?
• Why would you ignore rising crime that mostly victimizes blacks unless you were fully committed to just hurting whites by any way possible?
• Why would you deliberately dumb down education, ignore the environmental impacts of immigration, or pick fights overseas that aren’t tied to any existing American national interest?

The Great Replacement isn’t a conspiracy theory, but a fact. It’s recognized as such by friends and foes alike. The only thing that matters is whether you think it is good or not. And if you have misgivings about being reduced into a hated minority in the only country we have, the Left’s only answer is repression.

After all, hurting you is their real reason for supporting mass immigration in the first place.”

https://vdare.com/articles/leftists-claim-great-replacement-is-a-conspiracy-theory-unless-they-re-bragging-about-it

“The “Great Replacement,” the systematic dispossession of white Americans and Europeans by Third World immigrants, is either a “conspiracy theory” or a self-evident good depending on who is talking about it. Main Stream Media publications recently denounced those who discuss it as accomplices to terrorism or at least purveyors of fake news. Yet other journalists, some from the same publications, run articles gloating about the obvious political consequences of immigration-driven demographic change. In a step beyond the “who, whom” model where everything is analyzed from the standpoint of which group benefits, we are now in a situation where people making the same objective observation are either good or bad depending on their views about it. It’s beyond politics; it’s madness.

A typical example: American expat Mellissa Rossi’s hysterical article, “’Great Replacement’ ideology is spreading hate in U.S. and across the globe” .[Yahoo News, June 30, 2019] Incredibly, this is meant to be straight news. It casually associated white advocate Martin Sellner with Christchurch shooter Brenton Tarrant because they share a “controversial belief” in the replacement of white Christians. She says Sellner views this eventual replacement as a “mathematical fact” and she even admits that “statistics show, [this] is true in some countries.” However, she says it is “off the rails” because the percentage of Muslims will not be majority status anytime soon—according to “experts.”

The obvious counter, made by Sellner: if you extend the timeline, Muslims eventually replace the native population. But Rossi simply dismisses this as a “shaky premise” that has “inspired mass shootings.” The obvious intention: to scare people away from even exploring these ideas, even though she has no real argument against them. Neither does anyone else except name-calling and accusations of violence:

• The White-Extinction Conspiracy Theory Is Bonkers, by Farhad Manjoo, New York Times, March 20, 2019
• How the "White Replacement" Conspiracy Theory Spread Around the Globe, by Luke Darby, GQ, June 21, 2019 (Not surprisingly, this article partially blames YouTube.)
• "Replacement Theory," a Racist, Sexist Doctrine, Spreads in Far Right Circles, by Nellie Bowles, New York Times, March 18, 2019

The French writer Renaud Camus … is credited with coining the term the “Great Replacement.” The Nation gave him the typical point-and-sputter treatment with How Gay Icon Renaud Camus Became the Ideologue of White Supremacy, by James McAuley on June 17, 2019. Again, besides name-calling and accusing Renaud’s style of being “kitsch,” McAuley simply assures his readers that there is nothing new happening: “Significant demographic changes occurred during decolonization in the 1960s and ’70s; the arrivals today are hardly unprecedented,” he says.

Yet those changes had disastrous consequences for France. Charles de Gaulle also specifically advocated de-colonization in Algeria to avoid sparking mass migration [Charles de Gaulle and the Idea of France, by Gregory Hood, American Renaissance, June 14, 2019]. In retrospect, Europe should have just kept its empires; Third Worlders will follow whites wherever they go.

Journalists are also trying to condemn local GOP politicians for supposedly believing in this “conspiracy theory.” When Maine Republicans suggested Americans should be helped before asylum seekers, Greg Kesich at the Press-Herald detected another motive:

[Former Maine Governor Paul] LePage, [Waterville mayor Nick] Isgro, [Maine Republican Party Executive Director Jason] Savage and their allies are not being inconsistent about housing policy; they are being very consistent about something else—the alleged threat to white power posed by immigration, as described in the “Great Replacement” or “White Genocide” conspiracy theory.

[The View From Here: Conspiracy theory takes hold in Maine GOP, June 23, 2019]

Yet demographic changes have undeniable political and social implications. And, regularly, journalists smoothly transition from saying nothing is happening to bragging about what is happening, especially in American politics.

Thus Michelle Goldberg at The New York Times penned an op-ed entitled We Can Replace Them on October 29, 2018. Analyzing Democrat Stacey Abrams’s (ultimately unsuccessful) campaign against Republican Brian Kemp, Goldberg gloated about “an embittered white conservative minority… terrified at being swamped by a new multicultural polyglot majority.”

(I note in passing that if I wrote that I didn’t want to be “swamped by a new multicultural polyglot majority,” I’d be accused of racist and dehumanizing language).

Goldberg also claimed the Right is trying to forestall the emergence of this multicultural majority “at all costs.” (If only).

Paul Taylor boasts in The American Prospect:

For the first time ever, half of all Americans under the age of 20 are Hispanic, black, Asian American, or mixed race. They’re the mosaic created by a modern immigration wave that has brought more than 60 million newcomers here since 1965, nearly nine in ten of them nonwhite.

For them, diversity isn’t merely demography; it’s the beating heart of their value system.

[They’re a Blue Tidal Wave—If They Vote, June 17, 2018]

Taylor calls them “mosaics” because they will keep their own identity in a cultural “mosaic” rather than a melting pot. He notes his interview subjects believe America has always been racist and their cynicism may actually keep them away from the polls.

But, he notes:

The demographic changes that created the Mosaic generation have already transformed America.

It was only a dozen years ago that same-sex marriage, legal marijuana, and transgender rights were barely imaginable; Confederate statues stood tall; and no one had heard of Black Lives Matter, #MeToo, March for Our Lives, or Occupy Wall Street. Even in electoral politics, times have changed, though it doesn’t feel that way with Trump in the White House. But since 1992, Democratic presidential candidates have won the popular vote in six of seven elections. No political party in American history has ever accomplished that feat before (or had less to show for it, due to Electoral College inversions in 2000 and 2016).

Now, as Mosaics start pouring into the electorate, this big blue wave will keep getting even bigger.

“The US white majority will soon disappear forever” proclaim Dudley Poston and Rogelio Sanez in The Chicago Reporter [May 16, 2019] Their explanation? “[B]asic demography: births, deaths, and immigration.” In other words, the exact arguments made by Martin Sellner and others. However, because these journalists don’t oppose it, it is permissible to state these facts.

Similarly, Stef Knight at Business Insider dutifully reports that the United States is on the way to becoming a non-white majority by 2045 [May 1, 2019]. “The demographic shifts are already having an impact on our national identity, politics and the generational gap, according to sociologists and demographers who have studied the trends,” he proclaims.

Suddenly, something big is happening, and journalists admit the consequences. But they can notice it, whereas nationalists simply aren’t allowed to.

Anyone, even a journalist, would speak about the process differently if we weren’t talking about the West. When the Chinese government floods Tibet with Han migrants, everyone understands it is colonization [Beijing sends a new flood of Han migrants to Lhasa: Tibetans risk disappearing, Asia News, January 27, 2015]. It’s perhaps for that reason that the Dalai Lama recognizes that Third Worlders need to go back, lest Europe become an extension of Africa or the Middle East [Dalai Lama warns Europe could become ‘Muslim’ or ‘Africa,’ by Zachary Halaschak, Washington Examiner, June 27, 2019]

If Israel became majority Arab, it would cease to be a Jewish state. Israel’s existence would be pointless.

Decades ago, Rabbi Meir Kahane debated future Israeli Prime Minister Ehud Olmert on this question, and Olmert essentially said Kahane was right, but that the demographic transition was simply too far away to worry about. Yet the Israeli government today takes it seriously, working to increase Israeli birth rates and openly discussing the demographic issue. And so do American politicians, including Bernie Sanders, who freely admitted a one-state solution with equal rights for Jews and Palestinians would be the “end of Israel,” and thus something he opposes. But he has no such attachment to America, at least not anymore.

On Amazon, you can watch a documentary called “When Siberia Becomes Chinese,” which matter-of-factly discuss the political and cultural consequences of Chinese migrants moving into Russia’s thinly populated Far East looking for work. A New York Times opinion piece on the same subject concluded, “facts on the ground can become lines on the map”. [Why China Will Reclaim Siberia, by Frank Jacobs, January 13, 2015]

Journalists who tell us mass migration has no consequences insult our intelligence.

Of course, most of the journalists calling the Great Replacement a “conspiracy theory” do know this—they are simply being disingenuous. They look forward to the day the West is deconstructed for good. In other articles, they let the mask slip.

Yet Conservatism Inc. too tells patriots that America’s magic dirt will somehow transform Third Worlders into the heirs of the Founding Fathers. This is nonsense, and only the most naïve conservative believes otherwise. Politics may be downstream from culture, but culture is downstream from demographics. Both Leftist journalists and Identitarian activists know the Great Replacement is happening. Conservatism Inc. prevents the American Right from doing anything about it.

Forget about saving “conservatism”—Westerners must wake to this demographic tidal wave lest their culture, people and civilization be extinguished. If they don’t, every battle won or achievement made by Western Civilization is rendered pointless.

And no matter how shamefully or eagerly they surrender, Westerners won’t be remembered as graceful losers—just a bunch of racists.”

Indeed; history will cease as we know it, as history, as a linear process, is primarily a North Western European (Nordic) creation. And if the fall of the “great race” as Madison Grant called it, it will be game over too will be wokeness, liberalism, Leftism and political correctness, forever. These ideologies are diseases that seem to need a particular universalistic genome to flourish.