The Great Australian Covid Deception By Mrs Vera West
This goes back a bit, but is still relevant. An open letter to Australia’s health regulators and politicians from the Covidmedicalnetwork.com, details the health authorities failure to investigate and tell the public of the dangers of the vaxxes. The complaints include investigations being too limited in scope, a refusal to consider reliable research showing the jabs are not safe, the already high rate of injuries and death, the failure to consider treatments from repurposed drugs, and a complete ignoring of the now established superiority of natural immunity.
“A letter to Australia’s health regulators and politicians from the Covidmedicalnetwork.com extensively details their massive failure to assess properly the effects of the vaccines that are being brutally forced on Australians.
The list of shortcomings revealed is too long to detail here, but it ranges from the investigations being too limited in scope, a refusal to consider reliable research showing the jabs are not safe, the already high rate of injuries and death, the failure to consider treatments from repurposed drugs, a complete ignoring of the now established superiority of natural immunity and, perhaps worst of all, the possible indications that the mRNA inoculations change a person’s DNA, something the Therapeutic Goods Administration (TGA) specifically declared cannot happen.
If anybody is surprised at the gravity of the accusations being made, they shouldn’t be. It was impossible to do adequate safety checks in only a few months. Before the COVID panic it was a given in biomedicine that it takes six to eight years to make judgements about the medium-term effects of drugs. So when Australia’s health bureaucrats and politicians declared that the “vaccines” were safe they were engaging in deliberate deception. They could not possibly have known that and their deceit is now clear.
The Covidmedicalnetwork.com is bravely trying to get Australian medical authorities to finally do their jobs properly. They are unlikely to get far. People who deceive rarely respond well when exposed. It is human nature, when caught out, to obfuscate, so it is no surprise that the documents are heavily redacted. This in itself arouses suspicion. If the assessment processes were sound, why is information being hidden? And what gives public servants the right to conceal information from the public?
Much of what is in the letter will be familiar to those who have taken the time to track the evidence emerging around the world of the dangers of the jabs. I urge people to read it, depressing though it is. It also raises another question. Can debate over science and public policy in this country ever recover? Or are we destined to see more and more of our basic rights eroded? Will the mantra ‘we are following the science’ come to mean: ‘shut up and obey, or else’?
The cynical use of alleged science was especially egregious with the Victorian premier Daniel Andrews, one of Australia’s more tyrannical state leaders, passing a law giving him the right to unilaterally declare a state of emergency whenever he wants and to re-imprison the citizens with lockdowns.
On the rare occasions when alternative scientific claims were mentioned in his heavily managed press conferences, Andrews would respond: “You have your scientists, I have mine.” As far as he was concerned it was just an exercise of power. That is why he bragged, when he was partially removing restrictions (but only for the jabbed), that for the unvaccinated he was replacing “lockdowns with lockouts.”
Such aggression against Australian citizens by politicians – the Western Australian premier Mark McGowan has just established a ‘COVID detection force’ to randomly test people – is unprecedented in this country. It is hard to escape the conclusion that we are entering a dark new era in which the state will use whatever it claims is the science to destroy our democratic rights.
The letter, which came after a Freedom of Information request, estimates that somewhere between 2,275 and 6,501 Australians probably died as a consequence of receiving a COVID-19 vaccination, which “likely means that more have died from COVID-19 vaccines than from COVID-19 illness.” That is an understatement. According to the Australian Bureau of Statistics (ABS) 2,639 people have had COVID listed on their death certificates, but only 220 had only COVID listed. Even on the lowest estimates, vaccine deaths are already higher than COVID deaths.
The ABS also showed that COVID deaths were heavily skewed to the elderly; the average age is almost identical to the average mortality in the country. Yet there are now saturation advertisements on Australia television urging parents to jab 5-11 year olds, who are at zero risk from the disease. That is child homicide.
The letter points to growing evidence that vaccines kill. The most reliable measure is all cause mortality, and there are disturbing trends in Australia, as there are around the world: “In contrast to 2020, and commensurate with the rollout of COVID-19 vaccines in Australia, we are confronted with a seriously concerning set of data. During the period 1 January through end of November 2021, Australian health authorities and politicians promoting COVID-19 vaccines need to explain the following: there were 6,949 deaths (5.4%) more than the 2015-19 average, and there were 6,264 deaths (4.8%) more than in 2020.”
The authors describe the situation as an “abominable state of affairs, bereft of any notion of the Hippocratic Oath or the upholding of the Precautionary Principle.” Australians are, they claim “in an environment now driven by public health institutions and their officers, extolling politicised and compromised information, at the expense of truth, any respect for informed consent, let alone respecting the once sacred and honoured and inviolable doctor-patient relationship.”
That, unfortunately, is where Australia has gone. Recovering our democracy after such abuse of mock science will be a long and difficult road.”
“8 March 2022 Associate Professor Nigel Crawford Chair, Australian Therapeutics Advisory Group on Immunisation (ATAGI) Other voting members of ATAGI: Professor Michelle Giles Professor Allen Cheng Ms Karen Bellamy Professor Katie Flanagan Dr Katherine Gibney Dr Penelope Burns Professor Cheryl Jones Adjunct Professor Tony Korman Associate Professor Bette Liu Dr Nicholas Silberstein Dr James Wood Ms Diane Walsh Professor Tom Snelling Ms Kristy Cooper Dr Brendan Murphy Secretary, Department of Health Professor Paul Kelly Chief Medical Officer, Department of Health Professor John Skerritt Deputy Secretary, Health Products Regulatory Group (Therapeutics Goods Administration, TGA) TGA’s Advisory Committee on Vaccines (ACV) Professor Allen Cheng, Chair Professor Jim Buttery Dr Jeanine Bygott Ms Madeline Hall Professor Kristine Macartney Dr Ines Rio Dr Vicky Sheppeard Associate Professor Adrienne Torda Professor Joseph Torresi Ms Diane Walsh The Honorable Greg Hunt Minister for Health & Aged Care Dear A/Prof Crawford, Dr Murphy, Prof Kelly, Prof Skerritt, Hon Minister Hunt, members of ATAGI and ACV, We, the Covid Medical Network and co-signatories, are writing to you to follow up on prior correspondence to ATAGI, the TGA and the Health Minister, and FOIA requests to the TGA, where answers have either been not forthcoming or have indicated the TGA has lacked 2 critical information for making its provisional approval of the gene-based vaccines, namely Pfizer’s BNT162b2 & Comirnaty, AstraZeneca’s ChAdOx1-S and Moderna’s Spikevax/mRNA-1273. This letter pertains to: 1. Correspondence you and the TGA received that the Pfizer (and AstraZeneca and Moderna) data via the companies themselves or via the FDA was likely too limited in scope to make a proper determination of safety and efficacy. 2. FOIA requests to the TGA with respect to reproductive toxicology issues that have been responded to late and with heavily redacted documents. 3. FOIA request with respect to micro-RNA sequences and related molecular genetic issues as to whether the TGA had assessed these. 4. Peer-reviewed published in vitro research that gene-based vaccine generated spike proteins can migrate into human cell nuclei to disrupt DNA repair mechanisms, and vaccine-derived RNA can be reverse transcribed with evidence pointing to possible integration of this sequence into human genome. 5. That a release of some Pfizer data from a FOIA request to the FDA in the US indicated high adverse events reporting by 28 February 2021. 6. Analysis of the TGA’s own Database of Adverse Events Notifications (DAEN) data and what Australian clinicians are increasingly witnessing as a high rate of injuries from these gene-based vaccines. 7. Extrapolating from German insurance company actuarial data, backed up by multiple US insurance company actuarial data, Australia’s DAEN Covid-19 adverse event data is likely to be under-reported by 9-fold. To date, 2,422, and possibly as high as 6,501 Australians dying as results of the Covid-19 gene-based vaccines is a justifiable calculation. 8. All-cause mortality data from official UK, EU and US databases indicate a positive correlation with the Covid-19 gene-based vaccine rollouts during 2021. 9. US military doctors have provided data from the US military electronic medical records database (DMED) showing an almost 10-fold increase in registered diagnosis episodes since gene-based vaccines were given to personnel. 10. German pathologists described pathological aggregates of spike proteins and lymphocyte infiltrations in inflamed organs in autopsies related to deaths postvaccination. Has the TGA provided guidance and resources for autopsies of postvaccine deaths of Australians? 11. Reports of inadequacies, irregularities and possible fraudulent practices in the Pfizer vaccine trial provided by whistleblowers to the BMJ. 12. The correspondence you received concerned with lack of sufficient safety analysis for rolling out the Pfizer vaccine to Australian children, based on that FDA release of the Pfizer adverse events data, that you received prior to Christmas. 13. The evidence that the Omicron variant of SARS-CoV-2 is milder than the average seasonal influenza virus. 14. The evidence that the gene-based vaccines do not prevent transmission. 3 15. From a modern immunological perspective, too frequent vaccinations for respiratory viruses runs the risk of desensitising the immune response to the virus and thus lead to hypoimmunity and worse illness. 16. Anomalies being reported in vaccine vials and blood samples from an increasing number of labs and practitioners around the world are creating suspicion. These are unexpected findings and at a minimum warrant further high level investigation. 17. Clinicians and researchers around the world have trialled various repurposed medicines and vitamins, zinc and nutritional supplements for Covid-19 with varying but often apparent success, particularly when used early and in combination. Suppression of such protocols that have long-term safety data by the TGA and AHPRA has deprived Australians of safe and possibly effective treatments. 18. Natural immunity and safer traditional vaccines have been under-recognised. 19. An article in the high-impact journal Nature, notes that data collection and presentation during the Covid-19 pandemic has been substandard. Thus the capacity to ‘follow the science’ has been impaired. The US Center for Disease Control (CDC) recently admitted to withholding data for allegedly politicised reasons. The safety signals presented by the data in this letter are of such grave concern that the normal decision would be to immediately halt the use of gene-based vaccines to the Australian public. In view of all the data presented, we request: That you immediately: 1. Withdraw any information saying these gene-based vaccines are “safe” 2. Withdraw the gene-based vaccines availability to the general public 3. Absolutely halt the rollout of gene-based vaccines to Australian children as a matter of urgency 4. Provide answers to the questions raised in italics in each section below. We are also carbon copying this letter to our parliamentary representatives so the issues raised can also be addressed via ‘Questions on Notice’ and through other democratic parliamentary means. We acknowledge that the data presented in this letter, and the opinions based on that data, contravene the narrative of “safe and effective” gene-based vaccines and the goal of vaccinating most of the population. However, the phrase “following the science”, means following the data as it comes to hand and therefore Science is about changing hypotheses, theories and conclusions in line with changing data. 4 In contrast, human societies including scientific groups, are prone to adhering to dominant ‘narratives’ once they have been formed. A ‘groupthink’ can emerge, that once established can be hard to shake off. This evolutionary psychological groupthink phenomenon forms the sociological basis for Thomas Kuhn’s seminal work The Structure of Scientific Revolutions. It doesn’t apply just to major scientific theories, that Kuhn was focussed upon, but also to more immediate group responses to threats such as a pandemic, when clinicians and the public anxiously want clear answers and treatments. The point of mentioning this, is to request that you come to what follows with a fresh perspective and open mind. In this regard we refer to a brief snippet of an interview of Dr Tony Fauci with Facebook’s Mark Zuckerberg from July 2021:
Comments