The Global Takeover: WHO Pandemic Treaty By James Reed

For information purposes here are details about the World Health Organization’s forthcoming Pandemic Treaty. There has been little discussion of this in Australia, but the ramifications are dramatic. Essentially, WHO will tell nations what will be done in the case of a “pandemic.” This alone is a worry, since WHO over-reacts as the monkey pox issue, which has fallen from attention, with a woke name change, now shows, as they were saying that this was the new Covid. We will live in a culture of disease paranoia. Worse, the violations of basic medical ethical principles, such as autonomy will be over-ridden. Global paternalism will eliminate individual freedom. Thus, expect mandatory vaccinations; no exemption’s, and the vaxxes are going to be mRNA and whatever experimental toxins Big Pharma wants to try out on the population.

 Yet, this treaty is moving ahead with no details being released to the public. Thus, contact the independents and your local member to get things rolling. This is as urgent as could be, as it really will be a depopulation agenda.

https://www.1news.info/health-news/bill-gates-global-takeover-is-official-1315334

“The WHO is actually a specialized agency within the United Nations. It
was initially established in 1948 to "further international cooperation
for improved public health conditions," but we can now see that the
long-term goal of the WHO is to serve as a foundation or hub for a one
world government under the auspice of coordinating and ensuring global
biosecurity.

This becomes self-evident when you review the proposed amendments1 to
the existing International Health Regulations (IHR) and the new pandemic
treaty, which Nass and Corbett review in the featured video.

I also provided details about the treaty in "What You Need to Know About
the WHO Pandemic Treaty." Below, I will primarily focus on the proposed
amendments to the International Health Regulations (IHR).

Health Regulation Amendments Will Legalize Tyranny

In a December 16, 2022, Substack article,2 James Roguski also reviewed
how a temporary crisis (the COVID-19 pandemic) — which, by the way, is
long since over — is being used by the WHO to seize permanent power.

The WHO's 'recommendations' are legally binding by all member states,
and supersede all national and state laws, including the U.S. Constitution.

Here's a quick overview of some of the most dangerous and egregious IHR
amendments they intend to implement, and what it will mean for you and
I. For additional details, see the three references listed here:3,4,5

Eliminating the concepts of respect for human dignity, human rights and
fundamental freedoms — The first principle in Article 3 of the original
IHR states that health regulations shall be implemented "with full
respect for the dignity, human rights and fundamental freedoms of persons."

The proposed amendment to this Article will strike "with full respect
for the dignity, human rights and fundamental freedoms of persons." Now,
health regulations will be based on "principles of equity, inclusivity
and coherence" only.

What does that mean? Think "You must wear a mask/social
distance/isolate/get jabbed to protect others," even if you're not sick,
or for whatever reason don't want to do any of those things.

Autonomy over your body will be eliminated. You'll have no right to make
personal health decisions. Even if you suspect you might die from the
intervention, you have to comply because it's all about what's "best"
for the collective.

Individuals won't matter. Human dignity will not be taken into
consideration. Human rights will not be taken into consideration, and
neither will the concept that human beings have fundamental freedoms
that cannot be infringed.

Another amendment is that public health measures will no longer be aimed
at achieving "the appropriate level of health protection." Instead, the
new objective will be to attain the "highest achievable level of health
protection" without any consideration of proportionality. It's easy to
see how this amendment will be used as justification for the removal of
individual rights and freedoms.

Dictatorial powers will be given to the director-general of the WHO —
The director-general will have sole power to declare the beginning and
end of a public health emergency of international concern (PHEI), and
the sole power to dictate responses (including travel restrictions, mask
mandates, lockdowns, business closures and vaccine requirements), and
the allocation of resources to that PHEI, including funding and what
drugs are to be manufactured and used.

These dictates will override and overrule any and all national laws
within member states, including the U.S. Constitution.

The obligations under the amended IHR are legally binding, and any
member nation that refuses the director-general's recommendations can be
punished through a variety of mechanisms, including economic sanctions
and embargoes. Note that the term "recommendation" is defined as
"legally binding," which means they're actually dictates, not suggestions.

Dictatorial powers will be given to unelected regional directors of the
WHO — Similarly, appointed (not elected) regional directors will have
the power to determine what constitutes a public health emergency of
regional concern (PHERC), and their decisions will also overrule all
other laws and Constitutional rights.

Eliminating privacy rights — One of the amendments (page 25) authorizes
the disclosure of private and personal data, including genomic data,
"where essential for the purposes of assessing and managing a public
health risk," i.e., contact tracing and related efforts.

Expanding censorship — The WHO will "strengthen capacities to … counter
misinformation and disinformation" at the global level. In other words,
censorship of information will be expanded. The WHO will dictate what
"truth" is, and since its decisions are legally binding, countries must
enforce compliance.

Mandating vaccine passports and digital IDs globally — The IHR
amendments will also give the WHO the power to mandate the use of
"health certificates,"6 i.e., vaccine passports. The vaccine passport,
in turn, will operate as your digital identification, which will be tied
to every aspect of your life, including your bank accounts and social
credit score.

In short, it will usher in a surveillance and forced compliance system.
The G20 also recently declared that digital vaccine passports
standardized by the WHO will be part of international pandemic
prevention and response moving forward.

The Trail of Corruption

Ever since its founding in 1948, the WHO has been infiltrated by
industry. From Big Tobacco to the nuclear industry and pharmaceuticals,
industry has historically dictated the WHO's global agenda and continues
to do so in the present day, putting profits and power ahead of public
health.7

In April 2020, then-President Donald Trump suspended U.S. funding to the
WHO,8 but then directed the U.S. funding for WHO to GAVI, which is a
Gates controlled charity that likely just sent the funds to WHO.
President Joe Biden restored U.S. funding once he took office.9

The Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation even before Trump pulled funding was
still the WHO's No.1 funder, as Gates contributes via multiple avenues,
including the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation, the vaccine alliance
GAVI, the Strategic Advisory Group of Experts (SAGE), UNICEF and Rotary
International.

Gates contributes such a large portion — currently about $1 billion of
the WHO's $4.84 billion biennial budget10 — that Politico in 2017 wrote
a highly-critical article11 about his undue financial influence over the
WHO's operations, which Politico said was causing the agency to spend:

"… a disproportionate amount of its resources on projects with the
measurable outcomes Gates prefers … Some health advocates fear that
because the Gates Foundation's money comes from investments in big
business, it could serve as a Trojan horse for corporate interests to
undermine WHO's role in setting standards and shaping health policies."

Indeed, as noted by Robert F. Kennedy Jr. in his book "Vax-Unvax,"12
"The sheer magnitude of his foundation's financial contributions has
made Bill Gates an unofficial — albeit unelected — leader of the WHO."
And, in that role, Gates is able to ensure that the decisions the WHO
makes end up profiting his own interests and those of his Big Pharma
partners.

A 'One World' Health Plan

In October 2022, the WHO announced a new initiative called One Health
Joint Plan of Action. The plan was launched by the Quadripartite, which
is made up of:

Beyond the amendments to the IHR, this initiative will also expand the
WHO's powers. The One Health Joint Plan of Action combines multiple
globalist organizations and synchronizes their plans, while at the same
time combining their resources and power to create a centralized global
superpower.

Decentralized health care and pandemic planning make sense, as both
medicine and government work best when individualized and locally
oriented. As it stands, however, the opposite global agenda is being
implemented.

While the Pandemic Treaty and the IHR amendments expand and centralize
power over human health with the WHO, the One Health Joint Plan expands
the WHO's power to also address "critical health threats" to animals,
plants and the environment.

When you add that together with the planned elimination of human rights,
you can see how the One Health Joint Plan can be used to enforce climate
lockdowns, for example, or travel restrictions to protect wildlife or
the environment. To learn more about this plan, see my previous article,
"WHO Assembles Superpowers With 'One Health Plan.'"

Jeremy Farrar Selected To Be WHO's Chief Scientist

December 13, 2022, the WHO announced that Sir Jeremy Farrar, head of the
Wellcome Trust, has been chosen as its new chief scientist.13 The
announcement came mere days after the publication of Dr. Anthony Fauci's
deposition transcript,14 which showed he and Farrar colluded to suppress
discussion about SARS-CoV-2 origin. ...

Agenda 21 is based on the ideology of "communitarianism," which argues
that "an individual's rights should be balanced against rights of the
community." Community, however, in the mind of the globalists, is made
up of NGOs, corporations and government, which are to dictate what
happens around the world. The people are not really part of the equation.

So, the communitarianist philosophy of Agenda 21 and the IHR amendment
that removes human rights and freedoms come together like two pieces of
a puzzle. The WHO's biosecurity powers can then be used to pave the way
for the more freedom-robbing aspects of Agenda 21.”