The Global Financial Enslavement System By James Reed
Dr Mercola has done all freedom fighters a great service by documenting in great detail the immunities, privileges and tax exemptions that 76 international banks and organisations have been given, bestowing upon them more power than even the emperors of old had; they rule the world now, and seek even more power. The world is not enough. Even organisations such as GAVI, Big Pharma, and CERN have similar immunities. This naturally makes it enormously difficult to control them, or even claw back some control against them, as we saw with Big Pharma in the Covid plandemic. It will require changes in government and a long-term political struggle to bring these organisations under control, or better yet, shut them down. But, Rome was not built, or destroyed, in a day. The “give me a solution now” camp will need to be patient and dig in for a long-term battle.
“A band of criminals got together a century ago and decided they were going to own the world, hold all of the power, create and hoard all of the money, and keep everyone on a constant spin cycle to fool them.
Not only were they going to construct it as they saw fit, but they were going to build the most elaborate enslavement system this world has ever seen – one that gives them full immunity, allows them to operate outside the law entirely, and they were going to do it without anyone realizing it until it was too late.
These self-imposed “rulers” believe themselves to be untouchable, have created documents stating as much, and are laughing at humanity as people move about their lives unaware of this elaborate scheme.
This is the story that needs to be shared with the world and with every state legislator who should move immediately to create independence from the Federal Reserve system and Central Banks, and enforce our Constitution and financial management laws to protect sovereignty at the state and local level.
This should include steps to recapture monies illegally stolen, to prevent current and future illegal expenditure of our tax monies and to end sovereign immunity privileges that have been used to engage in systematic criminal activities and racketeering. They do not operate above the law, they operate entirely outside of the law.
The Control Framework
This dualistic world they have created goes far beyond what most have imagined. It’s not so much that these individuals and organizations are “above the law,” as it is that they are operating entirely outside of the law, and have granted themselves permission to do so by executive orders, treaties, and the creation of BIS. The structure they have created is much like a pyramid scheme in a sense.
At the top of the ivory tower, sit BIS, the Bank for International Settlements, with sovereign immunity. When carrying out specific activities under BIS, this immunity extends to its members, which is made up of 63 global central banks and monetary authorities, the Federal Reserve System, plus insurers, and payment systems through their subsidiary, that BIS deems “systemically important institutions.”
As if that’s not bad enough, it gets worse. The U.S. has given 76 public international organizations immunities, privileges, and tax exemptions dating back to 1946, just 10 years after BIS expanded its immunities with The Hague Convention of 1936. In addition, some of these organizations have added immunities through treaties.
Underneath that layer, there are hundreds of NGOs, corporations, and universities that operate with and through these international organizations who hold immunities and privileges – some of whom have signed agreements and NDAs, others have been given immunity by extension.
The process is quite simple. The money essentially gets laundered through the organizations and banks which have little level of transparency or accountability, and spread across multiple countries, making it that much easier to achieve.
But it doesn’t end there. In addition to immunities enjoyed by these banks and organizations, Bill Gates’ GAVI also enjoys immunities and privileges. Of course, the World Bank serves on the board, manages their finances, and is the trustee, who enjoys an extensive amount of immunities and privileges to all five arms of the World Bank Group.
Couple that with the release of liability to big pharma when it comes to vaccines, and this is a recipe for disaster. Even CERN holds international immunity status, separately from the lists provided in this report.
At the bottom of this pyramid are civilians who pay in taxes, abide by a set of laws that the others never have to concern themselves with, and who have naively believed that these organizations and banks are operating in their best interest, while they squander away trillions of dollars to build a human enslavement system, and big Gov funnels them taxpayer dollars. This is how they’ve managed to do it for so long, without fear or conscience.
What’s important to recognize about these specific organizations, is the fact that they cover nearly every industry. In other words – those behind these organizations and banks are the future rulers of the world if they are not stopped. Their framework is already in place.
What must be done to stop this band of criminal characters who masterminded how to create special privileges for themselves, outside of the system, signed some pieces of paper, and declared they have immunity to steal people’s hard-earned money?
International Organizations Immunities Act (IOIA) of December 29, 1945
Almost immediately after World War II, Congress passed the International Organizations Immunities Act, which was signed into law on December 29, 1945. This established immunities, privileges, and tax exemptions for international organizations that might not be considered international organizations under the rules of international laws, such as the Global Fund, for example.
What defines a qualifying “international organization”? The IOIA states: “For the purposes of this title, the term “international organization” means a public international organization in which the United States participates pursuant to any treaty or under the authority of any Act of Congress authorizing such participation or making an appropriation for such participation …”
Once the IOIA was passed, it was by the authorization of the President(s) to grant these privileges to international organizations by executive order. The President also has the authority to condition, limit, or revoke the designation. Whereas, there have been a few that received limited privileges, there does not seem to be any that have been revoked, with exception of organizations that dissolved.
However, in 1983 President Ronald Reagan extended additional immunities from lawsuits and prosecution to Interpol, and in 2009, President Barack Obama granted additional benefits.
The IOIA states that “International organizations … shall enjoy the same immunity from suit and every form of judicial process as is enjoyed by foreign governments, except to the extent that such organizations may expressly waive their immunity.” This gave them absolute immunity. In 1976, the Foreign Sovereign Immunities Act was passed which created some restrictions on immunities, but the IOIA seemed to have remained vague on the matter.
When it comes to immunities and privileges, there are countries who grant them to international organizations under their own criteria and rules, there are headquarters agreements that provide additional immunities and privileges, and there are international treaties that also grant immunities and privileges.
A single organization could have one, two, or all three at the same time. As an example, the Global Fund has privileges by the U.S., and international treaties with multiple countries, while having additional immunities in Switzerland, including a headquarters agreement. In other words, they are protected to the hilt.
Immunities, Privileges, and Tax Exemptions Enjoyed by IOIA Status
Note that in this Act, as well as treaties, they often say, “unless immunity is waived,” and what they mean by that is that the internal heads of the organization determine whether they wish to waive immunity so that a particular legal case may see the light of day in court, outside of the organization using its internal council for any such debates or legal action.
Unless something so outrageous happened, such as an employee murdering another employee, it would be unlikely that any organization would waive their immunity rights to settle disputes on their own.
This is a cliff note summary of their ability to operate outside the law. The full version of the IOIA can be reviewed in detail via the original Act signed into law, Yale Law School, or for more background visit Wikipedia.
|
International organizations, their property and their assets, wherever located, and by whomsoever held, shall enjoy the same immunity from suit and every form of judicial process as is enjoyed by foreign governments, unless the organization waives their immunity |
|
Immunity from search and seizure of property and assets, wherever located, and by whomsoever held |
|
Archives are inviolable |
|
Exemption from property taxes, internal revenue taxes, communication taxes, taxes on transportation of persons or property, customs duties and taxes |
|
Admission of officers and employees, and their family members, without checks from customs |
|
Officers and employees are exempt from legal suits or any other legal action in regards to activities related to work |
|
Employees are exempt from income tax, if they are not U.S. citizens, or are both a U.S. citizen and a citizen of the Commonwealth of the Philippines |
|
Officers and employees of the international organization, and members of their immediate families, other than nationals of the United States, require no alien registration or fingerprinting, or registration of foreign agents |
|
If the Secretary of State determines that the continued presence of a person from an international organization, in the United States, is no longer desirable, or if the Secretary of State wishes to withdraw the privileges, exemptions, and immunities of the international organization itself, they have the power to do so |
76 International Organizations Given Immunities and Privileges
The list below is in the order in which the immunities were first given to these organizations. As anyone can see, Truman was instrumental in kicking this off with 20 designations, and Bill Clinton holds second place. Since President Truman, every president thereafter issued immunities to various organizations, with the exception of President Trump, and thus far, Biden.
This is a comprehensive list that includes the organization, date it was founded, headquarters, the dates they were given immunity and by whom, and the executive order numbers that correspond, which have been rigorously checked. Also note that some of these organizations also have treaties that give them additional immunities and privileges, such as the UN. This will be covered further in part 2.
|
Organization of American States (formerly the Pan American Union) |
|
International Labor Organization (founded under League of Nations, now part of UN) |
|
Food and Agriculture Organization of The United Nations |
|
United Nations |
|
Pan American Health Organization (previously Pan American Sanitary Bureau) |
|
Inter-American Statistical Institute |
|
Inter-American Institute for Cooperation for Agriculture (formerly the Inter-American Institute for Agricultural Sciences) |
|
International Bank for Reconstruction and Development (World Bank) |
|
International Monetary Fund (UN) |
|
International Wheat Advisory Committee (International Wheat Council) |
|
International Telecommunication Union (est as International Telegraph Union, now under UN) |
|
United Nations Educational, Scientific, and Cultural Organization (UNESCO) – UN |
|
International Civil Aviation Organization (UN) |
|
International Cotton Advisory Committee |
|
International Joint Commission – United States & Canada |
|
World Health Organization (UN) |
|
Pacific Community (formerly the South Pacific Commission) |
|
Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD) – (formerly the Organization for European Economic Cooperation) |
|
Inter-American Defense Board |
|
International Organization for Migration (formerly Provisional Intergovernmental Committee for the Movement of Migrants for Europe and Intergovernmental Committee for European Migration) |
|
International Finance Corporation (under World Bank) |
|
Universal Postal Union (established by Treaty of Bern, now under UN) |
|
International Atomic Energy Agency (UN) |
|
International Hydrographic Bureau |
|
International Maritime Organization (formerly the Intergovernmental Maritime Consultative Organization – UN) |
|
World Meteorological Organization (UN) |
|
Inter-American Development Bank |
|
International Pacific Halibut Commission |
|
Inter-American Tropical Tuna Commission |
|
Great Lakes Fishery Commission |
|
International Coffee Organization (setup under the auspices of the UN) |
|
Asian Development Bank |
|
Inter-American Investment Corporation |
|
European Bank for Reconstruction and Development |
|
European Space Agency (formerly the European Space Research Organization) |
|
International Secretariat for Volunteer Service (formerly the International Peace Corps Secretariat) |
|
United International Bureau for the Protection of Intellectual Property (BIPRI) |
|
World Customs Organization (formerly the Customs Cooperation Council) |
|
African Union (formerly the Organization of African Unity) |
|
World Intellectual Property Organization (UN) |
|
International Development Association (under World Bank) |
|
International Centre for Settlement of Investment Disputes (under World Bank) |
|
International Fertilizer Development Center |
|
International Mobile Satellite Organization |
|
Multinational Force and Observers |
|
International Food Policy Research Institute – limited privileges |
|
African Development Bank |
|
International Criminal Police Organization (INTERPOL) – limited privileges |
|
International Boundary and Water Commission – the United States & Mexico |
|
World Tourism Organization (UN) |
|
Pacific Salmon Commission |
|
United Nations Industrial Development Organization |
|
International Committee of the Red Cross |
|
Multilateral Investment Guarantee Agency (under World Bank) |
|
Organization for Eastern Caribbean States |
|
International Fund for Agriculture Development (UN) |
|
International Development Law Organization |
|
North Pacific Anadromous Fish Commission |
|
North Pacific Marine Science Organization |
|
Border Environmental Cooperation Commission |
|
Commission for Environmental Cooperation |
|
North American Development Bank |
|
Israel-United States Binational Industrial Research and Development Foundation |
|
International Union for Conservation of Nature and Natural Resources – limited privileges |
|
World Trade Organization |
|
Organization for the Prohibition of Chemical Weapons |
|
Hong Kong Economic and Trades Offices |
|
Inter Parliamentary Union |
|
GRECO (Council of Europe in Respect of the Group of States Against Corruption) |
|
European Central Bank |
|
African Development Fund |
|
Global Fund (Bill & Melinda Gates, Jeffrey Sachs, Kofi Annan, Amir Attaran) |
|
ITER International Fusion Energy Organization |
|
Office of the High Representative in Bosnia and Herzegovina and the International Civilian Office in Kosovo |
|
International Renewable Energy Agency (IRENA) |
|
World Organization for Animal Health (formerly the Office International des Epizooties (OIE)) |
Since Truman, every President has given immunities to a number of international organizations, except President Trump, and thus far, Biden.
Additional Organizations With Immunity by Treaties and/or No Liability Laws
GAVI, founded in 2000 by the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation, with UNICEF, the World Bank Group, and WHO listed as partners, was originally hosted by the United Nations Children’s Fund (UNICEF), meaning it was granted immunities and privileges through this hosting relationship.
When UNICEF no longer hosted GAVI, it became a foundation and an international institution under Swiss law, and was given privileges and immunities in Switzerland on January 1, 2009, that equate to those the UN enjoys. In fact, GAVI was the first international institution to receive recognition under the new Host State Act in Switzerland.
Yes, this is the same GAVI that has contracted with most of the world to help rollout Covid jabs, and the same GAVI who has received billions in funding from the U.S. government over the past two decades.
As an added bonus, the U.S. decided to create the U.S. International Development Finance Corporation (DFC) in 2019 to finance the private sector in healthcare, energy, telecommunications, and critical infrastructure. Just this May, GAVI and DFC partnered to create the COVAX Rapid Financing Facility, providing up to $1 billion to unleash more Covid jabs.
The World Bank, whose branches all receive outrageous immunities and privileges, is coincidentally GAVI’s trustee, manages their finances, and holds several seats on the board.
The Global Fund was founded in 2000 by Bill & Melinda Gates, Kofi Annan, Amir Attaran, and Jeffrey Sachs, and was launched in 2002. They ran a similar scheme. They established as a foundation under Swiss Law as well. In an agreement with the WHO providing a Secretariat for the Global Fund, it extended the WHO’s immunities and privileges to the Global Fund.
At the same time GAVI received privileges and immunities in Switzerland, the Global Fund ended their agreement with the WHO on the same day. That said, as seen in the list above, the Global Fund was already receiving immunities and privileges by the U.S. and had already obtained them from Switzerland as well. It didn’t take long for them to convince other jurisdictions to grant them similar immunities.
They are not the only ones who have benefited from extended immunities. Much more on this coming up in part 2.
Big Pharma
As reported in Corey’s Digs report on Measles, Masterminds, and Millions, big pharma was granted full immunity from lawsuits for injuries and deaths resulting from vaccines, back in 1986 when the Vaccine Injury Compensation Program was created.
Just to be clear, all big pharma, GAVI, WHO, all five World Bank arms, and the Global Fund all hold immunities. Does anyone believe they are concerned about over 1.6 million cases of jab injuries and deaths reported to VAERS since 1986, when none of them would be held accountable, and taxpayer dollars will pay out anyone who receives minimal compensation?
Remember, most of them have these immunities on an international scale. And people wonder why they walk around fearless, while expanding on “population control” goals.
CERN: The European Organization for Nuclear Research
Formed in 1954, and headquartered in Canton of Geneva, Switzerland, CERN scientists want to figure out “what the universe is made of and how it works.” While they fire up their 17-mile long Hadron Collider to study particles and probe dark matter and celebrate with incredibly bizarre satanic ritual ceremonies, they too enjoy immunity and privileges.
“The Protocol recognizes … the organization’s capacity to contract, to acquire and to dispose of movable and immovable property and to participate in legal proceedings … Among other things, the new recognition means that our pension fund – which is an integral part of CERN without a legal status of its own – can now enter into investment operations in markets that were previously hard to access.” – Eva-Maria Groniger-Voss, CERN Legal Counsel
As of March, 2004, CERN gets to enjoy additional immunities, operating outside of its host states of Switzerland and France, to the other member states of their organization.
CERN operates with 23 member states, with additional states holding observer status, and a large number of non-member states with international cooperation agreements with CERN. Observer status and non-member status of the Russian Federation was removed on March 8, 2022.
The Protocol also grants them immunity from jurisdiction of the national courts. Of course, personnel who have claims against the organization need to submit them to the International Labour Organization, who also holds international immunity status. Immunity from jurisdiction is also extended to personnel, and exempts them and their family members from income tax and immigration restrictions. CERN has over 9,000 scientists.
The Bank for International Settlements (BIS): Immunity and Beyond
The Bank for International Settlements was established in Basel, Switzerland in 1930. It is an international financial institution owned by central banks and serves as a bank for central banks, in addition to acting as an agent or trustee with international financial transactions. It’s made up of members of central banks and monetary authorities, including the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System.
BIS is governed by a Board of Directors. In fact, Jerome H. Powell serves on the Board. BIS operates with sovereign immunity, and according to their website, some of these immunities not only extend to BIS members under specific activities, but also extend to “systemically important institutions,” which is likely the insurers, and payment systems.
There are currently 63 member banks and monetary authorities, plus their subsidiary members under the International Association of Deposit Insurers (IADI). They also have innovation hubs for CBDCs.
In the agreement between the Swiss Federal Council and BIS, a few of the immunities breakdown as follows:
Article 12-15, 18: Immunity for members of the board of directors, officers, bank staff, representatives of (non-)member banks and ‘experts’, including inviolability of all documentation.
Article 24: Immunity of premises.
Essentially, what this means, is that there is absolutely no transparency, traceability, or accountability for where funds are being moved.
The fact that some of these immunities extend to members and appear to extend to “systemically important institutions” by BIS, comes as no surprise. Separately, as seen in the list above on International Organizations with immunity, we know that the following 13 financial institutions do have immunities under the International Organizations Immunities Act:
|
African Development Bank |
African Development Fund |
|
Asian Development Bank |
European Bank for Reconstruction and Development |
|
European Central Bank (also listed on BIS under 63 member banks) |
Inter-American Development Bank |
|
International Bank for Reconstruction and Development (World Bank) |
International Centre for Settlement of Investment Disputes (part of the World Bank Group) |
|
International Development Association (part of the World Bank Group) |
International Finance Corporation (part of the World Bank Group) |
|
International Monetary Fund (UN) |
Multilateral Investment Guarantee Agency (part of the World Bank Group) |
|
North American Development Bank |
In 2005, Bill H.R. 3269 was introduced by Congress to amend the International Organization Immunities Act to include the Bank for International Settlements under the Act. Whereas, it passed the House, it never made it out of the Senate.
Catherine Austin Fitts of The Solari Report, Patrick Wood, and John Titus, have all covered the immunities with BIS and Central Banks and their findings thus far, so rather than regurgitate their solid work on this, it is all linked below. That said, there are a few additional points that need to be made in regard to some key timing elements.
A Few Key Timeline Points for Reference:
December 23, 1913
The Federal Reserve was created
January 20, 1930
The Bank for International Settlements was founded
1936
The Hague Convention expanded BIS’ immunities
July, 1944
The International Bank for Reconstruction and Development (World Bank) was founded
December 27, 1945
Eleven European countries signed the International Bank of Reconstruction and Development (World Bank) Articles of Agreement
December 29, 1945
The U.S. signed the International Organizations Immunities Act into law
February 19, 1946
President Harry S. Truman began dishing out immunities to international organizations, which included the World Bank Group’s five branches, as well as other banks listed above
September, 1994
The first BIS Board meeting after the Federal Reserve finally purchased shares in the BIS system, kicked off the central bank system on a global scale, with BIS at the helm
October 1, 1997
Money began going missing from the Department of Defense and the Department of Housing and Urban Development in the US Federal Government, in large amounts, totaling $21 trillion by fiscal 2015
September 10, 2000
BIS sent a note to its registered shareholders informing them of BIS’ decision to the new restriction on the right to hold shares in the BIS exclusively to central banks, which included details about the mandatory repurchase of all shares, and the amendments of BIS’ statutes that were to be adopted by the Extraordinary General Meeting held on January 8, 2001. Note on BIS’ site.
May, 2002
BIS created a subsidiary called the International Association of Deposit Insurers (IADI), whereby the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (FDIC) is a member, along with 91 other deposit insurers. The U.S. Treasury, International Monetary Fund, and the World Bank are a few of the partners of IADI.
August 22, 2019
BlackRock’s white paper on “Going Direct” reveals that the central bank is moving funds directly into the hands of public and private sector spenders (meaning equity investors), in a laundering scheme. The plan injected more than $5 trillion into the U.S. financial system. The following month, the U.S. Federal Reserve began a repo loan bailout program by “Going Direct” to the trading houses on Wall Street, and in March 2020, hired BlackRock to help implement the “Going Direct” plan.
For a fuller understanding on the history of BIS, central banks, immunities, and what this all means, it is prudent to watch and read the following:
|
All The Plenary’s Men, by John Titus |
|
The Iron Bank: Is BIS Sovereign Immunity the Secret Sauce Behind the Global Coup? Part 1 with Catherine Austin Fitts and Patrick Wood |
|
The Iron Bank: Is BIS Sovereign Immunity the Secret Sauce Behind the Global Coup? Part 2 with Catherine Austin Fitts and Patrick Wood |
|
Does the BIS Owe US $21 Trillion (Or Owe You $65,000)? by Catherine Austin Fitts |
|
Fed Immunity for Banksters with John Titus and Robert F. Kennedy Jr. |
|
The Tower of Basel, by Adam Lebor |
|
Missing Money, section on The Solari Report containing documents, articles, and videos |
Members of BIS: 63 Central Banks, Monetary Authorities and The Federal Reserve System:
This does not include the insurers and payment systems companies
|
Bank of Algeria |
Central Bank of Argentina |
Reserve Bank of Australia |
|
Central Bank of the Republic of Austria |
National Bank of Belgium |
Central Bank of Bosnia and Herzegovina |
|
Central Bank of Brazil |
Bulgarian National Bank |
Bank of Canada |
|
Central Bank of Chile |
People’s Bank of China |
Central Bank of Colombia |
|
Croatian National Bank |
Czech National Bank |
Danmarks National bank (Denmark) |
|
Bank of Estonia |
European Central Bank |
Bank of Finland |
|
Bank of France |
Deutsche Bundesbank (Germany) |
Bank of Greece |
|
Hong Kong Monetary Authority |
Magyar Nemzeti Bank (Hungary) |
Central Bank of Iceland |
|
Reserve Bank of India |
Bank Indonesia |
Central Bank of Ireland |
|
Bank of Israel |
Bank of Italy |
Bank of Japan |
|
Bank of Korea |
Central Bank of Kuwait |
Bank of Latvia |
|
Bank of Lithuania |
Central Bank of Luxembourg |
Central Bank of Malaysia |
|
Bank of Mexico |
Bank Al-Maghrib (Central Bank of Morocco) |
Netherlands Bank |
|
Reserve Bank of New Zealand |
Central Bank of Norway |
National Bank of the Republic of North Macedonia |
|
Central Reserve Bank of Peru |
Bangko Sentral ng Pilipinas (Philippines) |
Narodowy Bank Polski (Poland) |
|
Banco de Portugal |
National Bank of Romania |
Central Bank of the Russian Federation |
|
Saudi Central Bank |
National Bank of Serbia |
Monetary Authority of Singapore |
|
National Bank of Slovakia |
Bank of Slovenia |
South African Reserve Bank |
|
Bank of Spain |
Sveriges Riksbank (Sweden) |
Swiss National Bank |
|
Bank of Thailand |
Central Bank of the Republic of Türkiye |
Central Bank of the United Arab Emirates |
|
Bank of England |
Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System (United States) |
State Bank of Vietnam |
It’s Time to Close the Laundromat
Now that the ah ha moment has taken effect, contemplate how many thousands of NGOs and corporations have operated with and through this vast field of immunity, this untraceable and unaccountable land that knows no boundaries. There is no red tape within this realm – only dystopian fantasies they wish to fulfill as they pick off the feeders to serve their future dreamworld.
Just imagine walking through life knowing that you are untouchable, and consider the euphoria these power-hungry individuals steep in. Seduced by darkness and void of conscience, they continue to roll forward with their agendas, as everyone sits by praying for a miracle.
These are groups of men and women who masterminded a plan to take global control of the world’s money and weaponize it against everyone. The plotting began a century ago, and it’s far past time to foil their plan.
The John Birch Society recently published a couple of brilliant ideas as one way to combat this tyranny. They explain that state governments have an obligation to make all unconstitutional federal actions unenforceable, or null and void, and lay out two ways of accomplishing this when it comes to federal spending.
1)Enact an Escrow Law — They suggest that state legislatures should enact a “State Sovereignty and Federal Tax Funds Act,” known as an “escrow” law. Federal taxes would be required to go into a special fund controlled by the state government.
Once they calculate the actual constitutional federal spending, the state would only send that percentage of funds to the Internal Revenue Service (IRS). Remaining funds would go toward state expenditures that were reliant on federal funding, or be returned to taxpayers.
They point out that this would save taxpayers a considerable amount of hard-earned money because they estimate that 80% of federal spending is unconstitutional. This would protect the state and the people, while putting the federal government in check. They also point out that this bill has been introduced in five states in previous years, but has yet to be enacted into law, which is critical right now in order to gain the upper hand.
2)Nullify the Federal Reserve — Here, they argue that the Federal Reserve is unconstitutional and has created a monopoly on currency. They illustrate how 42 states have enacted legislation to abolish or curtail sales taxes on precious metals, which is a big step toward treating them as legal tender.
Oklahoma, Utah, and Wyoming are leading the pack by reaffirming the validity of gold and silver as legal tender to compete against Federal Reserve Notes. Texas opened a state precious-metals depository, and Tennessee has enacted legislation to study creating its own depository.
These are great steps in the right direction, but as the John Birch Society points out, state governments must enforce the Constitution’s Gold and Silver Clause (Article I, Section 10), which declares that “No State shall … make any Thing but gold and silver Coin a Tender in Payment of Debts.”
The bottom line is that states had better stop taking federal financial assistance which locks them into the rules and stipulations the government attaches to those funds, and they had better start holding them accountable, severing ties, and fulfilling their obligations to the people of their state, or these thieves will continue to thrive until they bleed everyone dry.
People, on the other hand, had better start paying attention to who they are doing business with, where they are banking and investing, why cash is so important to stay out of their system, and why everyone must get this information in the hands of their legislators immediately. Trillions of dollars have moved from the people, through the IRS and big Gov, and straight into their hands.
This spin cycle needs to come to an end. The Sound Money Defense League is a good source for information on state laws with precious metals and up-to-date news and insights on the financial moves being made.
This is a call to action, and people need to work together to strategize, make moves, and confront this enslavement scheme everyone has fallen prey to. It’s time to close the doors on this laundromat for good. Be sure to watch for Part 2 of this critical information from Corey Lynn on laundering immunity.”
Comments