The Genetic/Racial Destruction of Humanity if the Globalists Win, By Brian Simpson

Human biodiversity researcher Emil Kirkegaard has given his view on the biodiversity implications if the globalists succeed with the New World Order agenda. It is the Great Replacement right down to the genes. In his essay "End Stage Global Capitalism," Emil O. W. Kirkegaard explores the potential long-term consequences of unrestricted global capitalism, particularly focusing on open borders and the free movement of labor and capital. He begins by defining global capitalism as a market economy that allows relatively free movement of labour (people) and capital, noting that this closely resembles our current world system.

Kirkegaard highlights the significant economic disparities between countries, presenting data that illustrates the unequal distribution of wealth worldwide. This inequality motivates individuals from low-income nations to migrate to higher-income countries in search of better opportunities. He references surveys indicating that many people in poorer countries express a desire to move to more prosperous nations, with preferences often influenced by the prominence and perceived opportunities of the destination countries.

As migration continues, Kirkegaard theorises that poor countries may experience depopulation, though this could be offset by their higher fertility rates. Conversely, wealthy countries might see population increases due to incoming migrants, but this could lead to a decline in average human capital levels, as migrants come from regions with lower average human capital. Over time, he suggests, this movement could result in a global equilibrium where all countries have similar levels of human capital and wealth, reducing the desire for migration; everyone becomes Third World!

Kirkegaard posits that this redistribution of human capital would not change the global average but would significantly decrease variation between countries. He speculates that, eventually, all nations might converge to an average intelligence quotient (IQ) level, hypothetically around 80, incapable of maintaining an advanced technological civilisation. Intermarriage among different ethnic groups could further homogenise populations, leading to reduced genetic diversity in intelligence-related traits. In such a scenario, the overall variation in intelligence would diminish, resulting in fewer individuals with exceptionally high IQs.

He acknowledges that, at current migration rates, reaching this "end stage" would take several centuries. Various factors, such as strict immigration controls or global policy changes, could accelerate or decelerate this process. Kirkegaard emphasizes that his aim is not to predict exact timelines but to highlight the potential outcome of globalist capitalism as advocated by open-border libertarians. He warns that a world where every country becomes average in terms of human capital could have adverse effects on human civilization, particularly because innovation often relies on individuals with higher intelligence.

In summary, Kirkegaard's essay presents a thought-provoking analysis of the possible future implications of unrestricted global capitalism and open borders. He suggests that while such a system might lead to economic and human capital equilibrium among nations, it could also result in decreased global diversity in intelligence and a potential decline in innovation, with equality being reached, but the sort where everyone is equal at the bottom of the wheelie bin:

Hence the need to take opposing mass immigration as a major conservative cause, something which is not being done in Australia, which faces, either dysgenic doom, or colonisation.

https://www.emilkirkegaard.com/p/end-stage-global-capitalism