The Finance Minister’s Meaning of “Voluntary” By Brian Simpson
Rebekah Barnett has examined the Australian finance Minister's account of "voluntary," in the context of legislation relating to the Digital ID, which will be "voluntary." It is an exercise in double speak Barnett shows by looking at the Minister's view of the Covid vaccination policy. That too, the Minister said was "voluntary," and even if infringements of human rights occurred this was justified because of the good intent of the government! As the saying goes, the road to hell is paved with good intentions.
In response to the Queensland Supreme Court ruling that Covid vaccine mandates for emergency workers were "unlawful," the Minister said: "The Government's position on Covid-19 vaccinations is that it is voluntary, as are all vaccinations in Australia, although we do encourage and aim to vaccinate as many people as possible." The Minister seems to have forgotten that under the Covid mandates, unvaccinated children were not able to attend early education, or childcare services, that under the NO Jab, NO Pay policy, Family Assistance payments were withheld from parents of unvaccinated children, and objection to vaccination was not accepted as a valid objection. And under the Covid mandates the unvaccinated became second class citizens who were unable to travel, or attend things like gyms, restaurants, even public libraries.
The Minister regards all of this as "voluntary," so we should be alarmed at what is set to come with the Digital ID. Read "coercion" all the way down.
https://news.rebekahbarnett.com.au/p/digital-id-will-be-voluntary-the
"In the latest edition of Politician Does Doublespeak, Finance Minister Senator Katy Gallagher says that Australia's Covid vaccination policy is voluntary and that infringements on human rights were justified because of the government's good intentions, even if they were completely wrong.
It is very important to understand what the word "voluntary" means to Senator Gallagher, as she is currently working to legislate Digital ID, which she maintains will also be "voluntary."
Senator Gallagher, in her capacity representing the Prime Minister, said in response to last week's Queensland Supreme Court ruling that Covid vaccine mandates for emergency workers were 'unlawful',
"The Government's position on Covid-19 vaccinations is that it is voluntary, as are all vaccinations in Australia, although we do encourage and aim to vaccinate as many people as possible."
Under Australia's No Jab, No Pay policy, family assistance payments are withheld from parents of children who are not vaccinated according to the National Immunisation Program schedule. Vaccination objection is not a valid exemption.
Additionally, in most states and territories, unvaccinated children cannot attend early education or care services.
"Voluntary."
And of course, under Covid vaccine mandates, unvaccinated Australians couldn't work, couldn't travel, couldn't visit grandparents in aged care, couldn't go to a gym, couldn't sit in a restaurant, couldn't attend their school ball.
"Voluntary."
Though most Covid vaccine mandates have now lapsed, there are still industries and workplaces requiring proof of vaccination.
"In times of emergency, a pandemic, a one in a hundred year pandemic, decisions that State Governments and the Commonwealth Government took were difficult, and they balanced up, as is always the case with human rights, they balanced up a range of factors when making those decisions.
Actually, the Supreme Court ruled that the Queensland Police Service Covid vaccine mandates were 'unlawful' because the Commissioner didn't balance up human rights against other factors. Senator Gallagher is not one to get bogged down by facts, however,
"You know, that is always the case. Human rights are not absolute. They are seen in balance, and I think Governments did what they believed was in the best interests of their communities of protecting Australia, whether it was the border closures, whether it was the vaccines, whether it was closing schools, whether is was having lockdowns.
"I think with the benefit of hindsight, people will always argue whether those decisions were right, but I think those decisions were made in the interests of the community."
What Senator Gallagher is saying is, if there is an emergency, governments can ride roughshod over human rights, and as long as they say it's for the good of the people, it doesn't matter if the results are beneficial or catastrophic.
It is helpful to know that this is how Senator Gallagher views things, because she is heading up the push to legislate a national Digital ID program, which she says will be "voluntary."
One can only imagine what cyber emergencies are around the corner to justify a "voluntary" Digital ID program in which you will not be able to work, travel or socialise without "voluntarily" opting in.
Not that an emergency is required. The Australian State, Territory and Federal Governments already see fit to withhold benefits and access to services to drive "voluntary" uptake of vaccination."
Comments