The False Promise of Green Giants: How Offshore Wind Farms Are Poisoning Our Oceans and Livelihoods! By James Reed

Key player in the grand theatre of the "green revolution," offshore wind farms stand as towering symbols of progress, sleek, spinning behemoths promising to slay the dragon of fossil fuels and usher in a carbon-free utopia. But beneath the waves, a darker reality unfolds. These industrial monoliths, championed by globalist agendas and rushed through under the banner of climate urgency, are leaching toxins into our marine ecosystems, disrupting ancient fishing grounds, and exposing coastal communities to unseen health perils. What was sold as salvation is proving to be a slow-motion catastrophe, one that pits the raw power of nature against the hubris of engineered "renewables." And now, with HHS Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. directing the CDC to probe these hidden harms, the cracks in the facade are widening, revealing a story not of clean energy, but of ecological betrayal.

The directive from Kennedy,marks a seismic shift in federal scrutiny, one that aligns with the Trump administration's unapologetic scepticism toward the wind industry's unchecked expansion. Tasking the CDC's National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health (NIOSH) with assessing risks to commercial fishermen and marine life, the probe zeros in on electromagnetic frequencies (EMF) pulsing from undersea cables and the chemical cocktail seeping from turbine materials. Kennedy, the erstwhile environmental crusader turned HHS firebrand, personally met with NIOSH Director John Howard, handpicking experts to dissect these threats. The Surgeon General's office is looped in, and the report, slated for a swift turnaround, was derailed only by the Democrat-led government shutdown. This isn't bureaucratic busywork; it's a lifeline thrown to those who've long warned that the rush to "net zero" is dredging up toxins that could bioaccumulate in our food chain, from oysters to the dinner plates of everyday Americans.

At the heart of the alarm are the turbines themselves, monstrous structures armoured against the sea's relentless corrosion, yet betraying their defences into the very waters they claim to protect. A landmark 2024 study from the University of Portsmouth lays bare the scale of the contamination: corrosion-resistant coatings dissolve annually, dumping thousands of tonnes of aluminium, zinc, and indium into European waters alone. For context, current operations already release 3,219 tonnes of aluminium, 1,148 tonnes of zinc, and nearly 2 tonnes of indium per year across 30 gigawatts of capacity. Professor Gordon Watson, the marine biologist steering the research, doesn't mince words: while wind farms curb emissions, "there is limited data on how these metals affect the environment near operational offshore wind farms," leaving ecosystems, and the seafood they sustain, in a fog of uncertainty. Zinc levels, for one, already surpass known riverine inputs to the North Atlantic, priming shellfish like oysters and mussels for toxic overload. Consume enough zinc-laced bivalves, and you risk exceeding safe weekly intakes, flirting with endocrine disruption and neurological woes.

But metals are just the appetiser. The main course of contamination comes from the blades themselves, epoxy-laced behemoths that erode like sandcastles in a storm. Advocacy group Green Oceans, in its unflinching 2023 report "Offshore Wind and Human Health," exposes how these fibreglass monoliths shed microplastics, Bisphenol A (BPA), and a slurry of forever chemicals: PFAs, styrene, formaldehyde, phthalates, PVC foam, PET, and epoxy resins. A single blade failure, far more common than the industry admits, can vomit over 50 tons of this debris into the ocean, a toxic slurry linked to cancer cascades, immune sabotage, and cardiovascular plagues. Microplastics, those insidious specks infiltrating atheromas and arteries, correlate with skyrocketing heart disease rates. And it's not abstract: sediment churned up during installation resurrects decades-old industrial sludge, heavy metals, pesticides, more PFAs, releasing it into the water column where it climbs the food web, from plankton to plate. The Biden-era frenzy for expansion ignored these red flags, greenlighting projects that turn prime fishing grounds into chemical soups.

No one feels the sting more acutely than the commercial fishermen, the unsung stewards of our seas, whose hooks and nets have sustained coastal economies for generations. From Rhode Island to Massachusetts, these salt-of-the-earth warriors have launched a barrage of lawsuits against Biden's offshore wind blitz, decrying the obliteration of historic fishing beds and the existential threat to their way of life. The Responsible Offshore Development Alliance (RODA), representing thousands of East Coast harvesters, sued over Vineyard Wind in 2021, blasting federal approvals for steamrolling safety and habitat concerns. Fishermen argue turbines choke navigation, scatter stocks like squid and scallops, and amplify risks to endangered right whales, violations of the Endangered Species Act and Outer Continental Shelf Lands Act piled high. The Texas Public Policy Foundation, backing five fishing outfits and the Long Island Commercial Fishing Association, hammered Vineyard Wind for flouting national security and food supply safeguards, turning productive seabed into "wastelands for marine wildlife." Even as late as March 2025, RODA and allies petitioned the Supreme Court to revisit these cases, charging the Biden Interior Department with twisting statutes to favour wind over "reasonable uses" like fishing. The human toll? Livelihoods eviscerated; communities hollowed out, all in service to a "green" dream that prioritises elite virtue-signalling over working-class resilience.

Enter the Trump administration, a bulwark against this tidal wave of folly. President Trump's aversion to offshore wind, once derided as mere bluster, has crystallised into decisive action. In August 2025, his team slammed the brakes on the $4 billion Revolution Wind project off Rhode Island, a near-complete behemoth with 45 of 65 turbines already in place. Citing national security and the need to revisit "rushed" Biden permits, the Bureau of Ocean Energy Management (BOEM) issued a stop-work order, echoing a similar freeze on New York's Empire Wind earlier that year. This wasn't knee-jerk obstructionism; it was a reckoning. Trump's January executive order ignited a sweeping review of leasing and permitting, enlisting the EPA, Energy, Defense, and Commerce Departments in an inter-agency coalition to dissect the industry's vulnerabilities. Funding followed suit: $679 million in federal grants for a dozen projects vapourised, alongside a $716 million loan guarantee for New Jersey transmission upgrades. Critics wail of job losses and climate backsliding, but the maths tells a grimmer tale: Revolution Wind alone could've powered 350,000 homes, yet at what cost to the fishermen it displaces and the seafood it taints?

Kennedy's CDC probe could be the tipping point, a forensic scalpel carving through the greenwashing. If NIOSH confirms EMF-induced disorientation in marine migrants or metal bioaccumulation triggering endocrine chaos and cancers, the dam breaks. Future approvals, already snarled by Trump's coalition, face an uphill siege, forcing a real debate.

This saga underscores a profounder rift: the elite's top-down "transition," blind to collateral damage, versus a grounded defence of human and ecological sovereignty. Offshore wind is a recipe for regret, turning oceans into open-air labs for elite experiments. Fishermen aren't Luddites; they're canaries in the coal mine, or wind farm, as it were, signalling that true sustainability honours the web of life, not severs it for spreadsheets.

https://www.naturalnews.com/2025-11-15-cdc-to-investigate-potential-health-risks-wind-farms.html