The Disease is Not Meant to be Cured, it is Continuous By Brian Simpson

Monkeypox, many Covid critics are now arguing, is a “crime-in-progress” brought to us by the same suspects and in the usual manner that we have become accustomed to. However, with monkeypox, the script is based on a paper, Strengthening Global Systems to Prevent and Respond to High-Consequence Biological Threats, that was based on a “2021 tabletop exercise conducted in partnership with the Munich Security Conference.” This was a simulation of a bio-terror attack, based on an intentionally weaponized version of the monkeypox virus.

The Nuclear Threat Initiative (NTI), produced the event, which overlapped with Big Players from the Event 201 simulation that predicted Covid-19, its rollout and its mandates: Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation, Wellcome Trust, China CDC, United Nations, Merck, John Hopkins, U.S. Department of State, the usual players. Somehow these elites must “get off” on sending opening warnings us little people, to see how we respond, and find that time and time again, there is little recognition of what they are up.

The report’s Executive Summary states:

The exercise scenario portrayed a deadly, global pandemic involving an unusual strain of monkeypox virus that emerged in the fictional nation of Brinia and spread globally over 18 months. Ultimately, the exercise scenario revealed that the initial outbreak was caused by a terrorist attack using a pathogen engineered in a laboratory with inadequate biosafety and biosecurity provisions and weak oversight. By the end of the exercise, the fictional pandemic resulted in more than three billion cases and 270 million fatalities worldwide. [emphasis added]

According to the simulation schedule, the attack takes place on May 15, 2022. And while the NTI’s simulation took place in March 2021, the World Health Organization (WHO) was notified of four “confirmed” cases of monkeypox in the U.K. on … drum-roll … May 15, 2022, the very same day as predicted. Talk about an uncanny ability to predict the future, almost as if it was proceeding according to some diabolical conspiracy, which couldn’t be true, could it?

https://www.technocracy.news/monkeypox-technocracys-next-wave-of-crimes-against-humanity/

“I am currently traveling the country with Drs. Judy Mikovits, Richard Fleming and Reiner Fuellmich. Our one-day conference topic in nine cities focuses on the case for crimes against humanity having been committed by leaders of Big Pharma and the biosecurity cartel. Indeed, there are a multitude of potentially criminal violations at national and international levels. But now, meet monkeypox!

Our case is built from a forensic point of view examining the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic in hindsight: its conspiratorial beginnings, violations of international law and the Nuremberg Code and the massive coverup campaign to conceal criminal acts.

Suddenly, however, monkeypox has sprung forth upon the world stage, following the same playbook as SARS-CoV-2. As such, it is a “crime-in-progress” brought to us by the same people and in the same manner.

This time, the script is following a paper, Strengthening Global Systems to Prevent and Respond to High-Consequence Biological Threats, that was based on a “2021 tabletop exercise conducted in partnership with the Munich Security Conference.” This scripted simulation of a bio-terror attack was based on an intentionally weaponized version of the monkeypox virus.

Produced by the Nuclear Threat Initiative (NTI), the participants and contributors overlap those who sat in the Event 201 simulation that predicted SARS-CoV-2, its rollout and its policies: Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation, Wellcome Trust, China CDC, United Nations, Merck, John Hopkins, U.S. Department of State, etc.

According to the report’s Executive Summary,

The exercise scenario portrayed a deadly, global pandemic involving an unusual strain of monkeypox virus that emerged in the fictional nation of Brinia and spread globally over 18 months. Ultimately, the exercise scenario revealed that the initial outbreak was caused by a terrorist attack using a pathogen engineered in a laboratory with inadequate biosafety and biosecurity provisions and weak oversight. By the end of the exercise, the fictional pandemic resulted in more than three billion cases and 270 million fatalities worldwide. [emphasis added]

On the simulation schedule, the attack takes place on May 15, 2022. Since NTI’s simulation took place  over one year earlier in March 2021, it was no coincidence that the World Health Organization (WHO) was notified of four “confirmed” cases of monkeypox in the U.K. on, wait for it…  May 15, 2022. What? Yes, the very same day as “prophesied”.

Thereafter, headlines of a monkeypox outbreak spread like wildfire and now dominate the global news cycle. Here are a few examples:

• Massachusetts public health officials confirm case of monkeypox – Massachusetts Department of Public Health, May 18
• Monkeypox – WHO, May 19, an info page all about monkeypox
• Monkeypox goes global: why scientists are on alert – Nature, May 20
• Rare monkeypox outbreak in U.K., Europe and U.S.: What is it and should we worry? – NPR, May 20
• CDC Advises Doctors to Be on Alert for Monkeypox as WHO Confirms Outbreaks in 11 Countries – The Epoch Times, May 21
• WHO expects more cases of monkeypox to emerge globally – Reuters, May 21
• ‘Everybody Should Be Concerned’ About Monkeypox, Biden Warns – New York Times, May 22
• Monkeypox: Israel, Switzerland and Austria confirm cases – BBC News, May 22

According to the NTI scenario, by June 5, 2022 it is discovered that a “genome sequencing of monkeypox patient samples reveal that the strain in Brinia contains mutations that make it resistant to existing vaccines.” This revelation prompts “aggressive measures” such as “shutting down mass gatherings, imposing social-distancing measures, and implementing mask mandates.”

Sound familiar? It is immediately apparent that all of these so-called experts have learned nothing about the proven uselessness of all these policies and instead, amplify them as if they were the only way to “flatten the curve.”

More disturbing than any of the above, however, is a change in alerting policy of a new pandemic. In Finding 2, they recommend that “governments should improve preparedness by developing national-level pandemic response plans built upon a coherent system it ‘triggers’ that prompt anticipatory action on a ‘no-regrets’ basis.”

No regrets? Where did this phrase come from? Apparently from an exercise participant who said, “It will be chaotic and frightening, but you can’t wait until you have certainty. You have to act with no regrets.”

This insane policy means that governments should be prepared to order a lockdown even if they only have a suspicion that a pandemic might be brewing. That is, no concrete evidence is necessary. Such a policy would be triggered on a “no-regrets” basis if they are wrong and yet have caused great damage to their populations and businesses.

Triggered by whom? This part is abundantly clear. Their recommendations state “The WHO must establish a graded, transparent, international public-health alert system” and also “develop and institute national-level triggers for early, proactive pandemic response.”

Governments and their leaders “must err on the side of taking early action… leaders cannot wait for cases or fatalities to accumulate before responding. If there is a significant chance that the outbreak could turn into a pandemic, national leaders should lean forward to scale up response efforts and capabilities.” Significant chance?

In short, the WHO sets triggers based on hunches rather than evidence and then national governments are expected to act on those triggers to shut everything down just in case. They must throw all restraint and caution aside, pre-committed to having no regrets even if they make a huge mistake.

By the time the monkeypox scenario is over on December 1, 2023, they predict that there will be 3.2 billion cases of monkeypox and 271 million deaths. Of course, this is pure fiction, but will it be sufficient fear porn to drive governments into “no-regrets” lockdowns just in case? Apparently so in Belgium’s case, as it is the first country to introduce compulsory monkeypox quarantine: anyone testing positive must isolate for 21 days. Mandated mass testing is certain to follow as are renewed contact tracing operations.

That Technocracy is at war with the entire civilized world is now self-evident. I have warned that additional attacks, beyond SARS-CoV-2 would certainly take place. This monkeypox panic is only exacerbated by contrived food shortages, inflation, energy crisis and financial crisis.

I will leave you with one last thought. These sophisticated looking experts at NTI’s simulation pretend that they are serving the “greater-good” by protecting us from unknown bio-terrorists. But, what if THEY are the real terrorists hoaxing the entire planet again as they did with SARS-CoV-2?”

https://childrenshealthdefense.org/defender/monkeypox-gates-foundation-who-pharma-execs-monkeypox-pandemic-simulation/?utm_source=salsa&eType=EmailBlastContent&eId=1f08234e-2879-46a8-8e6e-4455e544f2e9

“Did March 2021 ‘pandemic exercise’ predict monkeypox outbreak?

In October 2019, just weeks before the outbreak of COVID-19, the Johns Hopkins Center for Health Security, along with the World Economic Forum (WEF) and the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation, organized “Event 201,” a “high-level pandemic exercise” that mirrored what later followed with COVID-19 pandemic.

In March 2021, the Nuclear Threat Initiative (NTI), in conjunction with the Munich Security Conference, held a “tabletop exercise on reducing high-consequence biological threats.”

This “fictional exercise scenario” involved the simulation of “a deadly, global pandemic involving an unusual strain of monkeypox virus that first emerged in the fictional nation of Brinia and spread globally over 18 months.”

According to NTI, this exercise, which was “[d]eveloped in consultation with technical and policy experts,” brought together “19 senior leaders and experts from across Africa, the Americas, Asia, and Europe with decades of combined experience in public health, biotechnology industry, international security, and philanthropy.”

The exercise culminated in a report, published November 2021, titled “Strengthening Global Systems to Prevent and Respond to High-Consequence Biological Threats: Results from the 2021 Tabletop Exercise Conducted in Partnership with the Munich Security Conference.”

This report contains key findings from the exercise, as well as “actionable recommendations for the international community.”

The outcome of this “exercise scenario” found the fictional pandemic, “caused by a terrorist attack using a pathogen engineered in a laboratory with inadequate biosafety and biosecurity provisions and weak oversight,” led to “more than three billion cases and 270 million fatalities worldwide.”

The fictional start date of the monkeypox pandemic in this exercise was May 15, 2022. The first European case of monkeypox was identified on May 7, 2022.

Key findings from the report included:

• The “need” for “a more robust, transparent detection, evaluation, and early warning system that can rapidly communicate actionable information about pandemic risks.”
• “Gaps in national-level preparedness,” which will require national governments to “improve preparedness by developing national-level pandemic response plans built upon a coherent system of ‘triggers’ that prompt anticipatory action, despite uncertainty and near-term costs,” described as a “no-regrets” policymaking basis.
• “Gaps in biological research governance” in order to “meet today’s security requirements” and be “ready for significantly expanded challenges in the future.”
• “Insufficient financing of international preparedness for pandemics,” and a lack of financing for countries to “make the essential national investments in pandemic preparedness.”

Key recommendations included:

• Bolstering international systems “for pandemic risk assessment, warning, and investigating outbreak origins,” calling upon the WHO to “establish a graded, transparent, international public health alert system” and the United Nations system to “establish a new mechanism for investigating high-consequence biological events of unknown origin.”
• The development and implementation of “national-level triggers for early, proactive pandemic response,” including the adaptation of the “no-regrets” approach to responding to pandemics via “anticipatory action” based on “triggers” that would automatically generate a response to “high-consequence biological events.”
• The establishment of “an international entity dedicated to reducing emerging biological risks associated with rapid technology advances,” that would “support interventions throughout the bioscience and biotechnology research and development life cycle — from funding, through execution, and on to publication or commercialization.”
• The development of “a catalytic global health security fund to accelerate pandemic preparedness capacity building in countries around the world,” which would include “[n]ational leaders, development banks, philanthropic donors, and the private sector” with the aim of establishing and funding “a new financing mechanism to bolster global health security and pandemic preparedness” and that would incentivize “national governments to invest in their own preparedness over the long term.”
• The establishment of “a robust international process to tackle the challenge of supply chain resilience,” based on a “high-level panel’ that would be convened by the UN secretary-general “to develop recommendations for critical measures to bolster global supply chain resilience for medical and public health supplies.”

The above recommendations were borne out in practice during the simulated monkeypox pandemic scenario.

As stated in the report:

“In national pandemic response plans, specific readiness measures would be ‘triggered’ based on factors related to the potential severity of the outbreak, expected delays in situational awareness, and the time it would take to implement response measures and see results.”

What would be “triggered” bears a remarkable similarity to the COVID-19-related measures of the past two-plus years.

The report states:

“Although triggered actions would vary depending upon the particular needs of the country, in most cases the goals are the same: slow the spread of disease to buy time and flatten the epidemiological curve, while using that time to scale up public health and medical systems to keep up with growing caseloads and save lives.

“NPIs [non-pharmaceutical interventions] such as mask mandates and ceasing mass gatherings were deemed to be critical for blocking chains of disease transmission.

“Participants generally did not endorse travel restrictions such as border closures, but travel health screening measures [i.e., vaccine passports] were viewed as valuable.”

According to the results of the simulated scenario, the fictional countries that “prioritized keeping their economies open, undertaking little-to-no NPIs, and downplaying the virus and its potential impacts … have experienced much worse outcomes in terms of illness and mortality” than those fictional countries that “promptly adopted aggressive measures to slow virus transmission,” such as “shutting down mass gatherings, imposing social-distancing measures, and implementing mask mandates,” in addition to establishing “large-scale testing and contact-tracing operations.”

Gates Foundation, pharma execs, WHO participated in monkeypox pandemic simulation

Who took part in the NTI’s monkeypox pandemic simulation?

Key participants included:

• Ruxandra Draghia-Akli, global head of Johnson & Johnson Global Public Health R&D and Janssen Research & Development.
• Chris Elias, president of the global development division of the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation.
• George Gao, director-general of the Chinese Center for Disease Control and Prevention (the Chinese CDC).
• Margaret (Peggy) A. Hamburg, interim vice president for global biological policy and programs at NTI, a memberof the global health scientific advisory committee for the Gates Foundation and a member of the board of GAVI-The Vaccine Alliance.
• Sam Nunn, a former U.S. senator who is the founder and co-chair of NTI.
• Michael Ryan, executive director of the WHO Health Emergencies Program and a highly visible figure during COVID-19 times.
• Petra Wicklandt, head of corporate affairs for Merck.

Several of the participants listed above also “participated” in Event 201.

The authors of the report also stand out for their background.

For example, Dr. Jaime M. Yassif, vice president of NTI global biological policy and programs, holds a Ph.D. in biophysics from the University of California-Berkeley and a master’s degree in science and security from the King’s College, London, war studies department.

Yassif previously led the initiative on biosecurity and pandemic preparedness at the Open Philanthropy Project, including the management of nearly $40 million in biosecurity grants, the “initiation of new biosecurity work in China and India,” and “establishment of the Global Health Security Index.”

She also previously advised the U.S. Department of Defense on science and technology policy and worked on the Global Health Security Agenda at the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services.

Co-author Chris Isaac, program officer for NTI’s Global Biological Policy and Programs team, “has been involved with synthetic biology through the Internationally Genetically Engineered Machines Competition since the start of his scientific career” and “is an alumnus of the Emerging Leaders in Biosecurity Fellowship at the Johns Hopkins Center for Health Security.”

The report is the product of a partnership between NTI, co-founded by Nunn and Ted Turner, and the Munich Security Conference.

Both NTI ($3.5 million, for “vaccine development”) and the Munich Security conference ($1.2 million) received funding from the Gates Foundation.

The report itself was funded by the Open Philanthropy project, one of whose main funders is Dustin Moscovitz, co-founder of Facebook along with Mark Zuckerberg.

Open Philanthropy, over the past decade, has provided donations and grants to the following entities and for the following purposes:

• $166.9 million for “global health.”
• $90.2 million for “biosecurity and pandemic preparedness.”
• $18 million for “global catastrophic risks.”
• $40.2 to Johns Hopkins Center for Health Security.
• $17.9 to NTI.
• $2.2 to The Guardian.
• $1.6 to Rockefeller University.

Johns Hopkins Center for Health Security at center of multiple tabletop exercises

NTI and the Munich Security Conference are not new to “tabletop exercises” — their report highlights previous simulations, including a 2019 report titled “A Spreading Plague,” and a 2020 report titled “Preventing Global Catastrophic Biological Risks.”

Other simulations in the recent past, in addition to Event 201, include:

• Operation Dark Winter(June 2001, less than three months before the 9/11 attacks and subsequent anthrax scare, “examining the national security, intergovernmental, and information challenges of a biological attack on the American homeland”).
• Operation Atlantic Storm(January 2005, “designed to mimic a summit of transatlantic leaders forced to respond to a bioterrorist attack”).
• The Clade Xexercise (May 2018, “to illustrate high-level strategic decisions and policies that the United States and the world will need to pursue in order to prevent a pandemic or diminish its consequences should prevention fail”). Yassif helped develop the Clade X exercise.

The common denominator among all of these simulations? The Johns Hopkins Center for Health Security, which published a document titled “The SPARS Pandemic 2025-2028,” comprising “a futuristic scenario that illustrates communication dilemmas concerning medical countermeasures (MCMs) that could plausibly emerge in the not-so-distant future.”

Predictions for the future don’t end there, however. For instance, in September 2017, NTI and the WEF organized a roundtable discussion on the current state of biological risks presented by technology advancement in light of the Fourth Industrial Revolution.

And in January 2020, NTI and the WEF again joined forces, issuing a report titled “Biosecurity Innovation and Risk Reduction: A Global Framework for Accessible, Safe and Secure DNA Synthesis.”

According to the report:

“Rapid advancements in commercially available DNA synthesis technologies — used for example to artificially create gene sequences for clinical diagnosis and treatment — pose growing risks, with the potential to cause a catastrophic biological security threat if accidentally or deliberately misused.”

Merck, whose head of corporate affairs participated in the monkeypox simulation, was the subject of an FBI and CDC investigation in November 2021 regarding 15 suspicious vials labeled “smallpox” at a Merck facility in Philadelphia.

Bill Gates no stranger to predicting the future

Bill Gates has himself been remarkably prescient with his predictions of future events.

Here are some of Gates’ predictions:

• In a November 2015 TED talk, he stated“[i]f anything kills over 10 million people in the next few decades, it’s most likely to be a highly infectious virus rather than a war. Not missiles, but microbes.”
• In a 2017 speechat that year’s Munich Security Conference, he said “the next epidemic could originate on the computer screen of a terrorist intent on using genetic engineering to create a synthetic version of the smallpox virus,” arguing in favor of the merger of “health security” and “international security.”
• In May 2021, Gates said“[s]omebody who wants to cause damage could engineer a virus so that the cost, the chance of running into this is more than that of naturally-caused epidemics such as the current one … [t]he ways the humans interact with other species, these viruses are coming across the species barriers whether it’s bats or monkeys.”
• In November 2021, Gates publicly pondered, “[y]ou say, OK, what if a bioterrorist brought smallpox to 10 airports? You know, how would the world respond to that? There’s naturally-caused epidemics and bioterrorism-caused epidemics that could even be way worse than what we experienced today.”
• In February 2022, Gates warnedthat the next pandemic “… won’t necessarily be a coronavirus or even the flu. It is likely to be a respiratory virus. Because, with all the human travel we have now, that’s the one that can spread in such a rapid way,” emphasizing the significance of providing sufficient funds to the private sector and academia to build better vaccines, therapeutics and diagnostics.
• Earlier this month, Gates called forthe development of a so-called “Global Epidemic Response and Mobilization” (GERM) initiative, stating that present WHO funding was “not at all serious about pandemics” and that $1 billion a year would be needed to operate this initiative.
• Also this month, the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation announced“a new financial commitment of up to US$125 million to help end the acute phase of the COVID-19 pandemic and prepare for future pandemics,” with much of the money going toward “strengthening health systems in low-income countries, enhancing integrated disease monitoring, expanding access to pandemic tools, and helping countries manage COVID-19 alongside other pressing health needs.”
• In his new book, “How to Prevent the Next Pandemic,” Gates arguesthat, despite COVID fatigue, the world must focus on preparing for future pandemics, regardless of whether a disease is circulating.”