The Deep State Spies Within the Trump Inner Circle By Charles Taylor (Florida)

Here is an illustration, right from the top, of how the Deep State will break the law as it sees fit to achieve its nefarious ends. Thus, President Trump’s Chief of Staff, Mark Meadows was an FBI informant, and wore a wire to record every conversation that was conducted with Trump. This is not only criminal, but treason as well, as national security secrets could be known to unauthorised people, which is what the FBI would be. Yet the prosecutor Jack Smith, in his case against Trump has granted immunity to Meadows in an attempt to nail Trump at all costs.

As was said, it shows that the Deep State will ride right over the rule of law to achieve their ends.

https://gellerreport.com/2023/10/breaking-trumps-chief-of-staff-mark-meadows-worked-as-an-fbi-informant-wore-a-wire-to-record-all-conversations-with-president-trump.html/?lctg=23533907

“Allegedly Mark Meadows worked for the FBI as an informant and wore a wire to record all conversations with President Trump, while he was the Chief of Staff to him.

This is not only unconstitutional, but it’s criminal. This is the government we live with. It’s up to us…

— Ryan Fournier (@RyanAFournier) October 26, 2023

Everyone in earshot would be recorded, in the war room, discussions of military ops, the list of potential leaks to our enemies that would threaten national security are endless. The ability to threaten others in the conversations. This is treason how do they give immunity for…

— GrimsMemes (@GrimsMemes) October 26, 2023

ABC News: Former President Donald Trump’s final chief of staff in the White House, Mark Meadows, has spoken with special counsel Jack Smith’s team at least three times this year, including once before a federal grand jury, which came only after Smith granted Meadows immunity to testify under oath, according to sources familiar with the matter.

Sources told ABC News that Smith’s investigators were keenly interested in questioning Meadows about election-related conversations he had with Trump during his final months in office, and whether Meadows actually believed some of the claims he included in a book he published after Trump left office — a book that promised to “correct the record” on Trump.

Under the immunity order from Smith’s team, the information Meadows provided to the grand jury earlier this year can’t be used against him in a federal prosecution.

That immunity came after a lawyer for Meadows requested that his client be immunized to testify before the grand jury, sources familiar with the matter said. A senior Justice Department official signed off on the request and an immunity order was then issued by U.S. District Court Judge James Boasberg, the chief judge at the federal court in Washington, D.C., days before Meadows appeared before the grand jury in March, sources said.”

 

 

Comments

No comments made yet. Be the first to submit a comment
Already Registered? Login Here
Tuesday, 26 November 2024

Captcha Image