The Dark Tentacles of the World Health Organization (WHO), By James Reed

Dr Mark Trozzi, in an interview with nurse Lucinda Van Buren, has detailed the impact of globalists, through organisations such as the UN's World Health Organization (WHO), are having upon national healthcare systems. One point neglected by critics of globalism, is that there is not an appreciation of the tentacles which WHO has developed, including an extensive network of WHO Collaborating Centers. These are based within universities (such as medical schools), government agencies, and healthcare organizations. They work to follow WHO directives, as was seen most clearly during the Covid plandemic, each working to implement WHO directives.

This overrides national sovereignty for health policy. Thus, whatever the WHO proposes, goes, it being seen as the fountain of all health wisdom, even though it got everything disastrously wrong over Covid, assuming that the goal was to sustain public health, which clearly it was not.

The WHO over Covid, performed in perfect harmony with everything Big Pharma wanted. This should cast a shadow of doubt over this organisation, let alone that its key funders include Bill Gates. One should be alarmed, and keen to oppose the coming May 2025 pandemic treaty. Yet with Robert Kennedy Jr as US health czar, there is hope that round two of this can be finished as well, as the US will be out of it.

https://ac.news/revealing-the-whos-control-over-health-policies/

WORLD: In a recent interview with Lucinda Van Buren, we explored the significant impact of global health organizations—especially the WHO—on healthcare systems around the world.

Lucinda, a nurse with over 26 years of experience, has been a steadfast advocate for scientific integrity throughout the COVID era, standing firm in a field often influenced by political and financial agendas. Our conversation illuminated the concerning, often hidden influence of the WHO and its affiliates in directing national health policies that frequently sidestep local needs and ethical considerations.

The WHO Collaborating Centers: A Global Network with Local Implications

One of the most eye-opening points in our discussion was the extensive network of WHO Collaborating Centers embedded within national institutions. Lucinda detailed how, in Australia, these centers are situated within universities, government agencies, and healthcare organizations, each working to implement WHO directives. This network, designed to prioritize global agendas, highlights a concerning trend toward centralized control that risks overriding national sovereignty and local accountability.

Conflicts of Interest: The WHO's Funding and Private Donor Influence

A major concern revolves around the WHO's funding sources, with substantial contributions from private entities like the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation. This funding structure raises ethical questions, as WHO policies often appear to align with the interests of its largest donors. The organization's forceful promotion of COVID-19 vaccines—despite growing evidence of adverse effects and limitations in efficacy—reflects this influence, casting doubt on the WHO's commitment to public well-being over the priorities of its benefactors.

Ethical Breaches and Psychological Pressure in Healthcare

Lucinda shared her observations on the erosion of medical ethics throughout the pandemic, where healthcare professionals were pressured into compliance with mandates, often at the expense of their duty to patients. For those like Lucinda who resisted, the professional repercussions were significant, but they underscored the critical need for integrity in healthcare. She noted the use of psychological manipulation, employing fear to enforce compliance, and credited her practice of mindfulness and meditation with helping her see through this coercive atmosphere.

Reclaiming Healthcare: A Call to Action

Our conversation ended with a call to reclaim healthcare from unaccountable global entities. The WHO's actions during the pandemic—redefining medical standards, controlling health narratives, and leveraging its network of collaborating centers—highlight the risks of allowing centralized authority to dictate national health policy. To truly protect public health, we must demand transparency and accountability, ensuring that healthcare policies genuinely prioritize the welfare of the people.

Conclusion: Charting a New Path Forward

Lucinda's resolve to speak out underscores our collective responsibility to hold these organizations accountable. As healthcare professionals, citizens, and advocates, we must work to dismantle these global mechanisms that compromise transparency and ethics in healthcare. By restoring sovereignty and accountability, we can ensure that public health policies truly serve the interests of the people.