The Covid Vax Truth Will Out By Brian Simpson
A new study has shown that people who had Covid, but then recovered, and had the jab, were more than 2.6 times likely to suffer adverse reactions after the first jab. After jab number two, this figure was 1.25 times, relative to the unvaxxed. This appears to be because those who have had a Covid infection retain virus fragments in their system for some time, and may have a hyper-immune response. Such individuals were excluded from the initial Big Pharma trials as this response was not something that would have been wanted to have been seen.
According to another study: "Our study showed that natural immunity offers stronger and longer-lasting protection against infection, symptoms, and hospitalization compared to vaccine-induced immunity," Dr. Anneli Uusküla, the Department of Family Medicine and Public Health at the University of Tartu. So, it really was all for nothing; except of course, medical fascism.
These are the sorts of studies that should have been done before an experimental gene therapy was tested on the bulk of the human population. We still do not know what the final results of this experiment will be.
https://vigilantfox.news/p/dr-richard-urso-tried-to-warn-us
"Lock up Fauci, Birx, Marks, Walensky, and the like.
Dr. Richard Urso warned two years ago that if you mandate a vaccine for the COVID-recovered, "some of them are going to die."
He was right.
A new study confirms Dr. Urso's warning:
"People who recovered from COVID-19 and received a COVID-19 shot were MORE LIKELY to suffer adverse reactions," The Epoch Times reported.
"Across all vaccine brands, people with prior COVID-19 were 2.6 times as likely after dose one to suffer an adverse reaction, according to the new study."
"People with previous COVID-19 were also 1.25 times as likely after dose 2 to experience an adverse reaction."
This is exactly why Pfizer, Moderna, etc., went out of their way to exclude the COVID-recovered from their trials. Dr. Urso testified on March 1, 2022:
"Pfizer, Moderna, and J&J all went out of their way to eliminate patients with natural immunity from their studies. Why did they do that? I wonder why? Because these patients retain an antigenic fragment of the virus in their system for a long time, we're finding out — even 15 months later. There are serious risks for hyperimmune response. They didn't want their studies to be messed up. So they went out of their way to eliminate every single patient in every single study: J&J, Moderna, Pfizer to make sure that none of these patients were enrolled in a study."
Mandating shots for the naturally immune is one of the worst miscarriages of medical science in history.
A study published by Scientific Reports found that natural immunity proved to be SEVEN TIMES more protective than vaccinated immunity during the Delta phase.
It was all risk, zero benefit.
People should be in prison for this."
"People with protection against COVID-19 following recovery from the illness were better protected than those who received a COVID-19 vaccine, according to a new study.
People who received a vaccine were nearly five times as likely as the naturally immune to test positive for COVID-19 during the Delta era and 1.1 times as likely to test positive for COVID-19 during the Omicron era, researchers in Estonia found.
The vaccinated were also seven times as likely to be admitted to a hospital for COVID-19 amid the spread of the Delta variant and two times as likely to be admitted to a hospital during the Omicron period, when compared with the naturally immune, the researchers found.
"Our study showed that natural immunity offers stronger and longer-lasting protection against infection, symptoms, and hospitalization compared to vaccine-induced immunity," Dr. Anneli Uusküla, with the Department of Family Medicine and Public Health at the University of Tartu, and her co-authors wrote.
Previous studies have also found that post-infection immunity is superior to or similar to the protection bestowed by vaccines.
Dr. Uusküla and her colleagues said they felt there were gaps in the literature on the subject, prompting them to work on the study."
Comments