The Covid Vax Death Toll By Chris Knight (Florida)

Peter Halligan has given a substack post countering a mainstream article in The Lancet, which argued that the Covid vaxxes were lifesaving miracles, saving, in fact, 20 million lives. He quotes others who have nailed the statistical fallacy in the article, refuting the model used: “The above piece completely ignores the huge gradient in mortality susceptibility in the population. Younger people have had very low infection mortality throughout the past two years. The mathematical models assume the same level of mortality susceptibility across all populations. This assumption we know to be a fallacy and completely negates any of their “models.” In other words, the Lancet piece assumes that the young have the same remaining life as the elderly. Ludicrous.”

Yet, it still gets up and published.

 

 

https://peterhalligan.substack.com/p/20-million-saved-or-20-million-killed?utm_source=substack&utm_medium=email

 

“An article in the Lancet claims that 20 million lives were saved with the use of injections. (Note, the injections are not “vaccines”, they are gene therapies, that is therapeutics like Ivermectin, that should have been regulated as therapeutics. The manufacturers state this in their regulatory submissions and SEC filings.

Global impact of the first year of COVID-19 vaccination: a mathematical modelling study - The Lancet Infectious Diseases

A bright red flag is here:

“This work was supported by a Schmidt Science Fellowship in partnership with the Rhodes Trust (OJW), Centre funding from the UK Medical Research Council (all authors), grant funding from WHO (OJW, ABH, PW, and ACG), Gavi, The Vaccine Alliance, and the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation (JT and ACG), support from the Imperial College Research Fellowship (PW and ABH), and support from the National Institute for Health Research Health Protection Research Unit in Modelling Methodology and Community Jameel (all authors). We thank Sondre Ulvund Solstad from The Economist for developing excess mortality statistics and their help in interpreting these estimates.”

There is an excellent critique of the content here:

Did Covid Vaccines Save Tens of Millions of Lives? ⋆ Brownstone Institute

A single logical fallacy destroys the claims in the piece published on the Lancet. Brownstone (Roger Koops) describes it like this:

C. Population Susceptibility 

The above piece completely ignores the huge gradient in mortality susceptibility in the population. Younger people have had very low infection mortality throughout the past two years. The mathematical models assume the same level of mortality susceptibility across all populations. This assumption we know to be a fallacy and completely negates any of their “models.”

In other words, the Lancet piece assumes that the young have the same remaining life as the elderly. Ludicrous.

Instead, there needs to be a discussion around how many people the injections have killed or wounded with conditions that will develop into morbidities.

A reminder of the logic that the injections have killed 20 million people.

Add the EUDRA and VAERS adverse event data on deaths and “events” together, multiply by an under-reporting factor of 40, globalize the EU+US one eighth share of 12.5 billion global doses.

VAERS (take only the US data) 13,972 deaths and 854,084 adverse reactions to 5 August 2022

VAERS Summary for COVID-19 Vaccines through 8/5/2022 – VAERS Analysis

EUDRA (ignore the headline and scoot to the first image on the landing page) 46,999 deaths and 4,731,833 injuries

76,789 Deaths 6,089,773 Injuries Reported in U.S. and European Databases Following COVID-19 Vaccines - Vaccine Impact

Number of US injections = around 600m (increased to 608 million in the last few weeks)

CDC COVID Data Tracker: Vaccinations in the US

Number of EU injections = around 900m (increased to 915 million in the last few weeks)

Number of global injections = around 12 billion (increased to 12.5 billion in the last few weeks)

Coronavirus (COVID-19) Vaccinations - Our World in Data

The Lazarus Report showing less than one in 100 vaccination injuries are reported - see page 6 of 7 here that states “..fewer than 1% of vaccine adverse events are reported. Low reporting rates preclude or slow the identification of “problem” drugs and vaccines that endanger public health.”

Electronic Support for Public Health–Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (ESP:VAERS) (ahrq.gov)

Using a one in 100 under-reporting factor (URF) would make the injections horribly deadly and injurious (1.4 million deaths and 85 million injuries for the 600 million doses administered).

A more recent attempt at estimating the URF is around 40, here:

Determining the VAERS Under-Reporting Multiplier (healthimpactnews.com)

So, EU+US deaths = 13,972 + 46,999 = 60,971 deaths

and EU+US injuries = 854,084 + 6,089,773 = 6,943,857 (multiple per person, half of which are “serious”).

Multiply by 40 for URF and then by 8 to “globalize”

Global deaths are around 19.5 million SO FAR and global injuries are around 2.2 billion.

Those injuries are likely to develop into “conditions” and then morbidities.

WHO do you believe?”

 

“These numbers are best estimates, at this point in time, using government data for the global consequences of the clutch shot in terms of death and morbidity … Now, these numbers are beyond staggering. To contrast that with history, vaccines have typically been pulled from the market – the last one, the bird flu vaccine – was pulled with only 35 — three, five deaths.

I hope people can appreciate the scale of what is going on here. An unimaginable carnage WHICH ISN’T OVER because that number – first of all, is the current estimate. It does not include future deaths of a similar type, which will be cumulative on top of that.

It does not include stillbirths. It does not include those avoidable deaths due to having had a one-disease healthcare system for two and a half years, with people not being treated or investigated for cancer or treated for cancer, for example. Those numbers are not included. The numbers from the lockdowns, the suicides are not included. And also not included are the future deaths that we’re anticipating from a rapid increase in the rate of cancer presentations and fatal infections because of immune suppression induced by the clot shot. Those factors are IN ADDITION TO those jaw-dropping numbers that I just mentioned.

This is truly horrifying to think about, and there’s no doubt – this is a war on humanity. Those responsible and complicit in this crime against humanity NEED to be held accountable. Luckily, we have people like attorney Tom Renz, Dr. Henry Ealy, Dr. David Martin, and others working hard to make that happen.

In my last article I asked what would be done about the creation of SARS-COV2. That article (read here) focused on political and public aspects of the question. I have and will continue to offer - for free - my assistance to any elected official that credibly wants to fight this but here am going to answer my

But we can also do our part as individuals: resist, inform, and speak out against the narrative. The more people who are aware of what’s going on and emboldened by your courage to not comply, the greater chance we have to reach a “tipping point” and demand accountability before the next distraction hits.”

 

Comments

No comments made yet. Be the first to submit a comment
Already Registered? Login Here
Wednesday, 24 July 2024

Captcha Image