The Covid Vax Dam has Broken? By Brian Simpson
Dr. Mercola has argued the case that the Covid dam has broken, meaning the suppression of questioning of the Covid vaxxes is beginning to break down. He cites numerous cases from the literature, now openly challenging the "safe and effective" narrative. Thus, a study published in the peer-reviewed journal Frontiers in Immunology, investigated the effects of the Covid jabs upon the outcomes of hospitalised Covid-infected patients.Between the two samples of those who were vaxxed, and those who were not, mortality for the non-infected population was 36 percent and 27 percent for non-injected and injected groups respectively. For the infected population, the non-injected group had a mortality rate of 37 percent while the injected subset had a 70 percent mortality rate. Thus, those who received the Covid shots died at a faster rate compared to vaxxed patients, even after allowing for comorbidities. This is definitely a direct challenge to the effectiveness of the vax ideology.
As well, the rise in excess mortality across the Covid vaxxed West, has led to even the mainstream media beginning to wonder if the Covid vax has had a part to play. Thus, The Telegraph, which has done a good job on criticising mass immigration, published a piece on June 5, 2024 with the front-page title — "COVID Vaccines May Have Helped Fuel Rise in Excess Deaths." The article made use of a study published in the British Medical Journal Public Health on June 3, 2024, which undertook an international study of excess mortality from 2020 to 2022. It was found that there was a statistically significant increase in deaths beginning at the time of the Covid vax rollouts. This trend has been confirmed by other studies.
While correlation does not prove causation, it does not disprove it either. It is suggestive, given what is known about the toxicity of the mRNA spike protein, which is exactly how the former CDC director Dr Redfield described it, that it is the most plausible working hypothesis to account for the excess deaths. As such, the mantra of "safe and effective," continues to be eroded. Yet the health authorities in Australia still cling to this claim and the Covid vaxes have not been withdrawn from the market. So, maybe the "dam has broken" metaphor is a bit optimistic; perhaps cracks are appearing and the first waters are leaking, would be more appropriate.
"Three years since the first mRNA COVID-19 injections were released, the world is finally becoming aware of the dangers of getting them. Thanks to the committed efforts of many individuals fighting for the truth, it seems that — in the words of Dr. Meryl Nass — "the dam has broken."1
The Effectiveness of the Jabs Is Put Into Question
In a study2 published in Frontiers in Immunology, researchers from the hospital of Ohio State University sought to find out if the COVID injections actually improved the outcomes of hospitalized COVID-19 patients. From March 2020 to November 2022, 152 adult patients were selected — 112 of them tested positive for COVID-19, while the rest didn't. Furthermore, 23 of those who tested positive for COVID-19 were jabbed while the remaining 89 weren't.
What they discovered was a startling difference between those who got the shots and those who didn't. Mortality for the non-infected population was 36% and 27% among non-jabbed and injected groups respectively. But for the infected population, the non-jabbed subset had a mortality rate of 37% while the injected subset had a shocking 70% mortality rate.
Going deeper into the participants' backgrounds, researchers investigated the possible influence of comorbidities using the Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI), a widely used analytical tool to determine the survival rate of patients with multiple comorbidities.3 They discovered that the CCI score was significantly higher in jabbed versus unjabbed patients. The researchers noted:4
"Comorbidities and age are the known contributors to increased mortality among COVID-19 patients. Nonetheless, in our study, mortality remained significantly higher in the Vax patients even after adjustment for CCI, suggesting there are other risk factors in vaccinated patients."
The researchers also investigated the antibodies between the two populations. Interestingly, they discovered that the unjabbed subset had significantly higher antibody titers compared to those who got the shots. This discovery suggests the possible role of natural immunity in the protection against severe COVID-19.
Furthermore, the researchers suggest that getting the shot can lead to immune tolerance — a process that makes your immune system less likely to respond to antigens, such as SARS-CoV-2.5
Mainstream Media Now Reporting Shots Contributed to Excess Deaths
The alarming rise in excess mortality cannot be ignored anymore. It's reached a tipping point, so much so that mainstream media is even covering this topic. On June 5, 2024, The Telegraph published a front-page headline that doesn't mince words — "COVID Vaccines May Have Helped Fuel Rise in Excess Deaths."6
The article discusses a study published in BMJ Public Health on June 3, 2024, which looked at the excess mortality rates across 47 countries in the Western world from 2020 to 2022. To contextualize the findings, here's the definition of excess mortality, according to the researchers:7
"Excess mortality is assessed as the deviation between the reported number of deaths in a country during a certain week or month in 2020 until 2022 and the expected or projected number of deaths in a country for that period under normal conditions."
The researchers analyzed the records found in the "Our World in Data." It's an open-access database, which includes reports from the World Mortality Dataset and the Human Mortality Database.8 According to their findings, 87% of the countries included in the study reported a total excess mortality rate of 1,033,122 deaths during 2020.9
In 2021, that figure jumped to 1,256,942 excess deaths. This is an eye-opener, since this was the year in which lockdowns were implemented and the newly released mRNA shots were promoted to ostensibly contain the spread of the pandemic. As you can see, the number of excess deaths is staggering — yet this is not the only study that highlighted this issue.10
In another study, this time published in BMC Public Health, Norwegian researchers noted that there was an increase of excess mortality in Norway during 2020 to 2022. While it's easy to assume that COVID-19 was the top culprit, it wasn't:11
"There was considerable excess non-COVID-19 mortality in Norway from March 2020 until December 2022, mainly due to excess cardiovascular deaths. For respiratory diseases and dementia, mortality was lower than predicted."
Were the COVID shots responsible for this increase in excess mortality? While the researchers didn't specify this as the reason, this line of thought was suggested. According to their findings, "There is a temporal concordance between increasing vaccine coverage and increasing excess mortality."
Are Still Approved Despite Condemning Evidence
In a report by SOMO, vaccine manufacturers such as Pfizer, BioNTech, Moderna and Sinovac collectively made a staggering $90 billion in profit, and that's just between 2021 and 2022. How much more will they make as more COVID-19 variants emerge? Clearly, the answer is "never enough," as the gravy train is too profitable.
In a report12 by The Defender, the JN.1 variant is the most dominant strain in 2024, and the U.S. Food and Drug Administration's (FDA) vaccine advisory committee unanimously voted to include it in the vaccine composition for 2024 to 2025. The updated "vaccine" will also target subvariants KP.2 and KP.3.13 Unsurprisingly, when the vote was announced, shares of Novavax, a biotechnology company that manufactures vaccines, increased by 11%.14
Why is Big Pharma still pushing to manufacture these shots despite the glaring evidence of harm? The only answer that makes sense is the desire for profit — even at the cost of human lives. According to cancer researcher Dr. William Makis, the science isn't at the center anymore:15
"Unfortunately, the entire LNP/mRNA Vaccine field is a fraud. It's a failed technology with an unacceptably terrible side effect profile. The entire field now depends on the suppression of COVID-19 mRNA Vaccine injuries and deaths, which are now in the millions (5.3 million in WHO VigiAccess alone), so we are no longer dealing with scientists but con artists …
They are trying to find 'novel' ways to market a failed technology platform and sneak failed vaccine products onto the market. The Moderna HIV mRNA Vaccine is such a product … And yes, they are moving forward, despite 20% of HIV mRNA Vaccine Victims developing skin rashes in Phase I trials. Moderna will repeat the Phase I trials with a slightly lower dose. The poisonings will continue until vaccine injuries improve."
The COVID-19 Jabs Leave 'Turbo Cancers' in Their Wake
Based on mounting evidence, it seems that the recent uptick in "turbo cancers"16 may be a side effect of getting the jab. For those unfamiliar, oncologists coined this term to describe cancers that grow at such an alarming pace that patients frequently die before a proper treatment plan can even be executed.
In one example,17 described by board-certified internist and cardiologist Dr. Peter McCullough, a 56-year-old man developed basaloid carcinoma shortly after he received an mRNA COVID-19 shot. The patient experienced symptoms just four days after getting the jab, noting similarities to Bell's palsy and head pain. Shortly thereafter, a tumor developed on his face.
According to Dr. Makis,18 that kind of aggressiveness typically takes a few months to a couple of years. But in this case, it took only four days. The study notes:19
"We place this within the context of multiple immune impairments potentially related to the mRNA injections that would be expected to potentiate more aggressive presentation and progression of cancer.
The type of malignancy we describe suggests a population risk for occurrence of a large variety of relatively common basaloid phenotype cancer cells, which may have the potential for metastatic disease."
In another report, published in Frontiers in Medicine, researchers found a rapid progression of angioimmunoblastic T-cell lymphoma (AITL) — a rare type of non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL) — after receiving a COVID-19 booster shot. AITL is a cancer affecting the lymph system, primarily involving T-cells, a type of white blood cell that plays a crucial role in the immune system:20
"Such a rapid evolution would be highly unexpected in the natural course in the disease. Since mRNA vaccination is known to induce enlargement and hypermetabolic activity of draining lymph nodes, it is reasonable to postulate that it was the trigger of the changes observed.
Indeed, the increase in size and metabolic activity was higher in axillary lymph nodes draining the site of vaccine injection as compared to their contralateral counterparts. However, pre-existing lymphomatous nodes were also clearly enhanced as compared to the first test. Moreover, new hypermetabolic lesions most likely of lymphomatous nature clearly appeared at distance of the injection site."
How Turbo Cancers Can Possibly Develop
In a Highwire interview21 with Del Bigtree, Dr. Makis describes several possible mechanisms that can lead to cancer in susceptible individuals. The primary one is the modification of the mRNA used. The COVID shots actually don't have the identical mRNA found in the SARS-CoV-2 virus.
Instead, the mRNA has been manipulated through "codon optimization," a process where a genetic code is inserted into the spike protein, creating a rigid "skeleton."22 The reason codon optimization was used is because it's required for clinical trials and subsequent mass manufacturing. However, there's a downside to this, as noted by researchers:23
"Unfortunately, some of the potential problems associated with codon optimization, which can affect protein function and increase immunogenicity, may not be seen until the drug is in late-stage clinical trials, or after the drug is on the market."
Vaccine manufacturers bypassed this problem by making substitutions in the genetic instructions. Certain nucleotides (three nucleotides make up a codon) are swapped out, but still end up with the same protein. However, the enhanced efficiency comes at a price, which millions of people have already paid.
Injured by the Jab? These Resources Can Help
The best way to avoid exposing yourself to COVID jab-related injuries is by refusing the shot in the first place. But if you or a loved one already got it, what can you do?
The first step I recommend you take is seeking out expert advice. You can start by contacting the Front Line COVID-19 Critical Care Alliance (FLCCC). I believe that this organization has one of the best treatment protocols for those who were injured by the shot. The protocol's name is I-RECOVER, which can be downloaded from covid19criticalcare.com.
The World Health Council has also published a database of remedies that can help inhibit and eliminate spike proteins, which most experts agree is the primary culprit of the injuries. I summarize the recommendations in my article, "World Council for Health Reveals Spike Protein Detox."
Comments