The Contradiction at the Heart of Multiculturalism, that Will Destroy It By James Reed

     Multiculturalism in the West was about the ethno-racial replacement of primarily Anglo-Nordic populations through immigration, allowing the population numbers of these once minority ethnic groups to rise, while the Anglo population decreased. Thus, Australia has gone from about 97 percent Anglo-Celtic at Federation, to who know what today, maybe 30 percent. Philosophically multiculturalism embraced relativism and particularism, arguing that Western culture was not universal, but that all cultures and values are equal, except Anglo culture which is inferior and in need of replacement, which we are seeing happening in real time in the US presently. Now, this scam was only possible because Anglos accepted universalism, and moral principles arising from that, passively allowing their displacement because of extreme individualism, universalism, and deracination. But, now at the point of ethno-racial extinction, it is surely time to rethink this. This paradox of multiculturalism is aptly summarised by Eric Kaufmann:
  https://www.nationalreview.com/2019/02/populism-identity-politics-why-they-rise-in-tandem/

“Right-wing populism and left-wing identity politics have risen in tandem since 2013. Why? The connecting thread is the contradictions of multiculturalism, which encourage a “common enemy” form of minority identity while repressing even moderate expressions of majority identity. The former produces antagonistic identity politics on the left, while both contribute to populist blowback on the right. In the high culture, the advent of social media helped the cultural Left experience its Third Great Awakening, matching the waves of enthusiasm of the late ’60s and late ’80s. Meanwhile, multiculturalism’s half-century sway has presided over profound ethnic shifts, producing mounting conservative discontent. By narrowing the space for debating immigration, progressive taboos prevented mainstream liberals and conservatives from reaching a settlement on the issue. We are now reaping the results. Multiculturalism, which originated among small circles of bohemian intellectuals in the 1910s, came to be established in the elite institutions and mass culture of Western societies from the mid-1960s. Once ascendant, these values created new taboos that drew the boundaries of acceptable debate. These frowned on any expression of a national identity in which the ethnic majority was accorded a prominent role. Since slowing the rate of ethnocultural change is a primary motive for restrictionists, and this was viewed as beyond the pale, the desire to reduce immigration was considered racist. Second, multiculturalism, as its name suggests, encouraged minority groups to celebrate a politicized version of their identity. At multiculturalism’s heart, therefore, lies a contradiction: White majorities are compelled to be cosmopolitan, urged to supersede their ascribed identity. Minorities are enjoined to do the reverse.”

     So, now the time has come for our ethnic group to assert its group identity. Oh, but that’s tribalism! Yes, and since this multicult business has been let go so long, and nothing done to control immigration, what do you expect! Time to wake up or disappear. Look to the future as seen in the burning of the US. Those debates are our future, soon.