The Clear and Present Dangers of Digital ID: A Gateway to Total Control, By Brian Simpson

Governments worldwide are racing to implement digital identification systems, framing them as tools for "modernisation," "fraud prevention," and seamless access to services. Yet beneath the veneer of convenience lies a profound threat to individual liberty. From Vietnam's overnight deactivation of 86 million bank accounts, to the U.K.'s push for employment-tied IDs, the EU's 2030 mandate for universal adoption via the EUDI Wallet, and the World Economic Forum's (WEF) endorsement of these systems for "economic transformation," the pattern is unmistakable: a coordinated shift toward centralised surveillance and control. When paired with central bank digital currencies (CBDCs), digital IDs could enable punitive measures like carbon quotas, financial lockdowns for dissent, and real-time tracking of every transaction and movement. As economist Doug Casey warns, "Money is freedom, digital IDs are the first step in mass state surveillance." This is not paranoia; it's a logical extension of historical precedents and emerging technologies.

The Global Rollout: Coercion Masquerading as Progress

Digital IDs are electronic credentials that bundle personal data, biometrics, financial history, health records, and more, into a single, verifiable profile.

In Vietnam, the State Bank deactivated 86 million accounts in a single night to enforce linkage with the national digital ID system, citing "security upgrades." This wasn't voluntary; it was a blunt instrument to compel compliance, leaving millions unable to access funds. Thailand follows suit, tying transactions to state-issued IDs. These actions echo FDR's 1933 gold confiscation in the U.S., where citizens surrendered assets under threat of penalties, with minimal resistance.

The U.K. under Prime Minister Keir Starmer is advancing digital IDs explicitly linked to employment. Starmer has suggested they could become necessary for jobs, a step critics label coercive. "Governments would prefer everybody to be an employee," Casey observes. "Employees have taxes extracted before they even see it... Entrepreneurs are harder to control." The U.K. scrapped a similar post-9/11 scheme in 2010 as "intrusive," but Labour's revival starts "optional" before inevitably mandating it for services like banking, travel, and healthcare.

The EU targets 100% adoption by 2030 through the EUDI Wallet, a mobile app integrating IDs across member states. The WEF promotes this as "economic transformation," but it risks evolving into social credit systems, penalising "non-compliant" behaviour like exceeding emissions or criticising policy.

In the U.S., digital driver's licenses, TSA biometric programs, and CBDC pilots pave the way. Framed as efficiency, they normalise tracking: your ID could flag "suspicious" travel or purchases in real time.

The Inevitable Link to CBDCs: Programmable Money, Programmable Lives

Digital IDs don't operate in isolation; they're the foundation for CBDCs, government-issued digital currencies with expiration dates, spending restrictions, and geofencing. China's digital yuan already demos this: funds vanish if unused, or access is revoked for low social credit scores.

Pair IDs with CBDCs, and governments gain god-like powers:

• Financial Lockdowns: Freeze accounts for dissent, as seen in Canada's 2022 trucker protests.

• Carbon Quotas: Limit purchases based on "environmental impact."

• Behavioural Penalties: Deduct funds for "hate speech" or unapproved associations.

AI and quantum computing amplify this. Quantum breaks current encryption, exposing data troves. AI analyses patterns at scale, predicting and preempting "threats" to the state. Resistance becomes futile when every action is logged.

Casey draws the parallel: "Those who want to control others, collectivists, statists, naturally limit money's uses." Digital IDs erode anonymity, the bedrock of free societies.

Historical Precedents and the Slippery Slope

The Soviets monitored movements via internal passports. Today's tech is exponentially more invasive.

Starts voluntary: "Opt-in for faster airport lines." Ends mandatory: "No ID, no bank account, no job, no travel." Vietnam's blackout proves the endgame.

Counterarguments: Convenience vs. Control

Advocates claim benefits: reduced fraud, easier verification, inclusive services for the unbanked. True, but at what cost? Data breaches (e.g., Equifax 2017 exposing 147 million) show vulnerabilities. Centralised systems are hacker magnets; decentralised alternatives like Bitcoin already exist without state oversight.

"Is this natural tech progression or elite conspiracy?" Casey asks. "It's both." Efficiency enables control, governments won't resist the temptation.

Paths to Resistance: Reclaim Your Freedom

Pushback is possible, and essential:

• Advocate Locally: Support groups likeBig Brother Watch demanding non-digital options.

• Go Decentralised: Learn Bitcoin and DeFi. Hold private keys; transact peer-to-peer.

• Physical Assets: Store gold/silver outside banks, tangible, untrackable wealth.

• Self-Sufficiency: Grow food, learn trades, build off-grid skills.

• Privacy Tech: Use VPNs, encrypted comms, cash for daily needs.

History shows complacency invites tyranny. Vietnam's 86 million silenced accounts are a warning. The U.K.'s employment linkage, EU's wallet, U.S. biometrics, they're steps on the same path.

Digital IDs promise convenience but deliver chains. Will we accept this new normal, or resist before the cage door slams shut?

https://www.infowars.com/posts/digital-ids-the-global-push-for-control-and-the-fight-for-freedom