The Chattering Class and the Rigged and Corrupt US of A by Charles Taylor
I am not amazed at the bias shown by the print media against Donald Trump, since even given his inadequacies – which are many – he has come to represent a challenge to our politically corrupt globalist system.
The Australian has been examined by this American (me) now temporary in Australia, and I found that the usual articles, even if stating that Clinton was “unfit to be president” because of well, all the scandals (more below), Trump was worse! (The Weekend Australian, October 29-30, 2016, p. 22) Trump is “sexist” and “racist” and a “deplorable human being.” No mention is made of Hillary Clinton’s 1996 comments about black children in gangs being “super-predators,” without conscience or empathy, who should be brought to “heal,” presumably like dogs: http://www.huffingtonpost.com/ronda-lee/hillarys-superpredator-comment_b_9655052.html. Hillary Clinton is “a clear and unequivocal lesser of evils.” And everybody Bernard Salt knows is anti-Trump (The Weekend Australian Magazine), October 29-30, 2016), which says more about his circle of friends than Trump.
The Australian October 31, 2016, p. 1, for example, only mentions polls where Clinton is ahead or one’s predicting a Clinton victory. I did not find mention of the predictions of the AI system MogIA, created by Sanjiv Rai of Geni.au, which accurately predicted the outcomes of the last three US presidential elections, and this time predicts that Trump will win. The system analyses millions of data points from the entire internet and is thus more accurate than a survey of a few hundred or thousand people: http://www.ibtimes.co.uk/ai-system-that-accurately-predicted-last-three-us-elections.says-donald-trump-will-win-1588887. Nor was mention made of the Brietbart News Network/Gravis Marketing poll, which showed a “statistical tie.” (Brietbart.com, October 27, 2016)
Nevertheless, the Australian chattering class seem almost as nervous as my American chatters. Consider the slant given to the latest email scandal on page 8 of The Australian, November 1, 2016, p. 8. “FBI Knew of Emails Weeks Ago” and “Comey ‘May Have Broken the Law.’”
Wait a minute, isn’t it Hillary Clinton who used the private email server and is the one to be examined here? The emails were found from an investigation into the sexting (sex texting) of former congressmen Anthony Weiner, formerly married to one of Clinton’s closet aids, Huma Abedin.
Weiner had been sexting a 15-year-old girl, and that’s a crime.
The FBI obtained the laptop from Abedin and found 650,000 emails which could be the “missing” Clinton’s emails. Trump thinks so and says that this is the biggest scandal since Watergate: “Her criminal action was wilful, deliberate, intentional and purposeful. Hillary set up an illegal server for the obvious purpose of shielding her criminal conduct from public disclosure and exposure, knowing full well that her actions put our national security at risk.”
Although I have been critical of The Australian’s coverage of the issues of corruption around the Clinton’s, in the interests of fairness, I have noticed that Nick Cater (November 1, 2016, p. 12) has said that the Clinton Foundation is a “little shonky,” with speaking fees of a half a million dollars being a “bribe” and that the Clinton’s went from being broke to worth $US 55 million. He could have gone further though.
Wikileaks recently released details of how Bill Clinton and Doug Band secured “more than $50 million in for-profit activity” for “Bill Clinton Inc” being “in-kind services for the President and his family”: http://www.gopusa.com/?p=16503fomhide-true.
It gets worse though. A Government Accountability Institute report, From Russia with Money: Hillary Clinton, the Russia Reset and Cronyism (www.g-a-c.org), has this to say in its Executive Summary:
• A major technology transfer component of the Russian reset overseen by Hillary Clinton substantially enhanced the Russian military’s technological capabilities, according to both the FBI and the U.S. Army.
• Russian government officials and American corporations participated in the technology transfer project overseen by Hillary Clinton’s State Department that funnelled tens of millions of dollars to the Clinton Foundation.
• A Putin-connected Russian government fund transferred $35 million to a small company with Hillary Clinton’s campaign chairman John Podesta on its executive board, which included senior Russian officials.
• John Podesta failed to reveal, as required by law on his federal financial disclosures, his membership on the board of this offshore company.
• Podesta also headed up a think tank which wrote favourably about the Russian reset while apparently receiving millions from Kremlin-linked Russian oligarchs via an offshore LLC.
That would happen to be treason.
Clinton Emails and Dark and Dirty Secrets
The former U.S. Attorney for the District of Columbia, Joseph Di Genova, said in an interview to Brietbart News (http://www.breitbart.com/big-government/2016/10/30/fmr-u-s-atty-comeys-hand-forced-by-fbi-seething-anger-at-botched-hillary-email-investigation/), that there was “seething” anger over FBI Director James Comey’s previous investigation which let Clinton off the hook. His remarks about this are an eye-opener:
“The original so-called ‘investigation’ was not an investigation. It was not thorough. It was not professional. As far as we know there was no grand jury, which an ordinary investigation would have. There were no grand jury subpoenas, there was no search warrants. Immunities were given out like candy. Attorneys were allowed to represent multiple witnesses and defendants which is completely inconsistent with federal policy and ethnic standards. The list is endless.
The original investigation was not intended to be a real investigation. Comey decided – for political reasons – that he wanted to exonerate Hillary Clinton and the only answer to why he wanted to do that was because he didn’t want to be responsible for recommending the prosecution of the first female nominee of a major political party for President of the United States.
They followed none of the protocols that they ordinarily would have attained in such a prosecution. And the proof that that is the case is the letter that he sent to Congress, in which he announced that he was basically reopening the case because they had newly discovered evidence which was evidence on the laptop shared by Huma Abedin and her husband Anthony Weiner. If the original investigation had been conducted properly they would have known about that laptop, and they would have known about the tens of thousands of emails that related to the earlier investigation.
It is inconceivable to me that they did not learn about that other device, given the fact that Huma Abedin was interviewed, she allegedly gave up certain devices – but apparently not this one.
It’s no wonder that people who I spoken to inside the Bureau outside the Bureau view Comey as a dirty cop because they believe he has brought disrepute on the agency. The letter he sent just shows how bad the first investigation was.
People in the FBI are very disappointed in Comey’s leadership. They believe that he is unfit to serve, they believe he had no moral authority to lead the Bureau, they believe that he had created a double standard of justice established by his investigation into Clinton, that he has undermined the rule of law, that he has no credibility, and that he has become an embarrassment to the Bureau.
That is generally the thought certainly among former Bureau people, and it is certainly among the field agents and among the people in that building in Washington. There just is no doubt that the manner in which he has conducted himself has really, really sent a shiver through that building. And had it not been for that letter that he sent the other day, that he would be probably be facing a joint-Congressional resolution of no confidence in his leadership of the Bureau.”
FBI resentment of Hillary Clinton is well illustrated by former FBI director James Kallstrom calling the Clinton’s a “crime family” (http://www.breitbart.com/big-government/2016/10/30/former-fbi-official-calls-bill-hillary-clinton-crime-family/.
“The Clinton’s, that’s a crime family, basically. It’s like organised crime. I mean the Clinton Foundation is a cesspool.” He called Hillary Clinton a “pathological liar.” “God forbid we put someone like that in the White House.”
Democratic pollster Pat Caddell said to Breitbart News Daily on a Clinton presidency: “We’re talking about institutionalising corruption in a way that is like a third-world Banana Republic if she’s elected”: http://www.brietbart.com/radio/2016/10/27/caddell-electing-hillary-clinton-institutionalize-corruption-third-world-banana-republic/.
David Schippes, who led the Chief Investigative Council for the House Judiciary Committees’ investigation into whether Bill Clinton committed impeachable offences, said that he was “terrified” of a Hillary Clinton presidency: http://www.breitbart.com/2016-presidential-race/2016/10/30/exclusive-bill-clinton-impeachment-chief-house-investigator-im-terrified-hillary/. Schippers in the interview said that he was “terrified” that something (physical) would endanger him: “Because things happen.” “We know that there were people who disappeared.” He said that the death of Deputy White House Counsel, Vince Foster, was one thing his investigative committee was barred from probing. Although there were official government investigations into Foster’s death, an alleged suicide, Schippers believes that there are still open questions about his death. He was unable to investigate three murders that he thought was relevant. As well, the evidence against Bill Clinton was housed in the Ford House Office Building, under armed guard. Only 65 House members reviewed the evidence and other senators voted not to impeach Bill Clinton without examining the evidence. But of the 65 House members who did review the evidence, 64 voted to impeach.
Clinton is Evil and a Threat to Civilisation
Trump may have had a big dirty mouth, but he has not, as far as we know, acted so that hundreds of thousands of people have died. Clinton as Secretary of State oversaw the overthrow of Gaddafi, leading to a failed state and the murder of hundreds of thousands of innocent Libyan citizens, all of which rang in the rise of ISIS/Islamic State. Clinton said: “We came, we saw, he died.”
The Benghazi gun-running operation led to the death of American Ambassador Christopher Stevens, U.S. Foreign Service operative Sean Smith, and CIA contractors, Gen Doherty and Tyrone S. Woods.
Clinton oversaw the move to oust Bashar Assad of Syria, leading to a civil war with hundreds of thousands of deaths and a mass migration to the West that threatens to end European civilisation. All in a day’s work for Hillary.
While the Western new class champion Clinton as a saint of feminism and democracy, she has had a cosy relationship with radical Islam, the negation of feminism and democracy. Wikileaks information about a Bill Clinton speech in October 2015, reveals that Bill said that Hillary Clinton had a “working relationship” with the Muslim Brotherhood’s Mohamed Morsi in Egypt. (Breitbart, October 26, 2016)
The Russian and Chinese alliance with Syria and Iran is now stronger. Clinton wants a US/NATO no-fly zone over Syria, which is to stop Russia aircraft supporting Assad, since ISIS has no air force. In September 2016, the chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, General Joseph Francis Dunford, told the Senate Armed Services Committee that such a no-fly zone would lead to war with Russia and Syria. A Wikileaks release of information about a speech which Clinton gave to Goldman Sachs on June 4, 2013, indicates that she wants such a no-fly zone regardless of the number of civilian deaths: “you take a lot of civilians”; “you’re going to kill a lot of Syrians.”
Trump rightly observed that Hillary Clinton’s policy on Syria would “lead to World War Three” because of conflict with Russia: “You’re not fighting Syria anymore, you’re fighting Syria, Russia, and Iran, all right? Russia is a nuclear country, but a country where the nukes work as opposed to other countries that talk”: Breitbart.com, October 26, 2016. Vladimir Zhirinovsky, a close friend of Putin, also said that Hillary Clinton as president could spark World War III.
The Democrat establishment have already added to these nuclear tensions by claiming that Russia is behind the leaks that have exposed Clinton. As well, the Obama administration threatened a cyberattack on Russia. All of this led to Putin going onto nuclear war alert, requesting all top officials to return to Russia and the commencement of civil defence drills in preparation for nuclear war.
The US has the deluded belief that it can win a nuclear war with Russia because advances in technology have led to an improvement in the accuracy of strikes so that the Russian’s nuclear weapons could be destroyed. The SS-18 Satan II missile is said by the Russians to be capable of evading NATO/American defences, although it may not be available until 2018. However, according to Igor Sutyagin of the Royal United Services Institute, Russia’s existing missiles will be hard to intercept, and the Satan II is just a “huge overkill.” (The Australian, October 27, 2016, p. 9) Russian missiles capable of producing an EMP blackout of America, such as the Kalibr cruise missiles, can even be fired from commercial ships off the coast of the US.
In conclusion, the case against Hillary Clinton is decisive. To claim that she is the lesser evil, compared to Trump, is just plain stupid. Yet, this is the standard belief now held by the chattering class.
Be afraid; be very afraid.