The Case for the Prosecution of Dr Fauci By Charles Taylor (Florida)

Dissent Right journalist, Ben Bartee, has assembled a good brief for the indictment of Covid king, Dr Fauci, for both the negligent homicide via illicit gain of function research he funded at the Wuhan Institute of Virology, as well as his general involvement in promoting the Covid vax. The fact is that the vaxxes have resulted in numerous deaths. The case for the number of deaths being extremely large, is the core argument of the anti-vax movement, but few deny that deaths have occurred. Even one death is significant.

 

However, Bartee argues that given the under-reporting of the American vaccine-reporting organ, VAERS, of a factor of up to 100, “upwards of 2,000,000 deaths in the US alone may be attributable, in the final analysis, to the Covid shots.” That is a death toll greater than any war in this century. “Under Fauci’s guidance from his perch atop the NIAID, 2020 was the first-time synthetic mRNA was tested as a pharmaceutical therapeutic on a mass scale in humans. Everyone who took it was part of the biggest experiment in medical history. Many of them had no idea what they were getting into – in part, because people like Fauci promised over and over that the product was thoroughly vetted.”

“This was a lie, and Fauci knew it was a lie when he told it. He is, after all, as the corporate media incessantly reminds the public, the preeminent American virologist.

Every other vaccine in history has taken 10-15 years to develop and fully test in multiple stages of clinical trials. His lie cost people their lives and livelihoods, which any reasonable person could have foreseen.”

This meets the criteria for negligent homicide, that “A person acts with criminal negligence when his or her behavior is a gross deviation from the standard of care that a reasonable person would exercise in the same or similar situation.”

 

The real issue is how a criminal case would proceed, since so many others are also big players in the Covid plandemic, including Trump, who continues to mindlessly portray himself as father of the vax. If one goes down, they all should.

 

https://www.thedailybell.com/all-articles/news-analysis/fauci-should-be-prosecuted-for-negligent-homicide-for-vaccine-lies/

“I recently proposed that COVID Warlord Fauci can and should be prosecuted for negligent homicide vis a vis the illicit gain-of-function research he funded in Wuhan Institute of Virology.

Here, I would like to expand the indictment to include his vax-related criminality, which is legion.

On the vax front, Fauci is culpable for an untold number of deaths which will become, perhaps, more concrete over time as the research unfolds into what exactly the long-term effects of the gene therapy are.

As of March 2023, there are 19,476 preliminary reports of death from the COVID-19 shots reported to the CDC’s and FDA’s Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS).

However – and this is a huge caveat – the figures reflected in VAERS are likely significant under-estimates of the actual death toll. Research indicates that less than 1% of adverse events are ever actually reported to VAERS.

Via Harvard Pilgrim Health Care, in a report submitted to the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (HHS):

“Although 25% of ambulatory patients experience an adverse drug event, less than 0.3% of all adverse drug events and 1-13% of serious events are reported to the Food and Drug Administration (FDA).  Likewise, fewer than 1% of vaccine adverse events are reported.”

What this means is that, potentially, upwards of 2,000,000 deaths in the US alone may be attributable, in the final analysis, to the COVID shots. That’s 2,000,000 potential cases of negligent homicide, laid at the feet of Anthony Fauci, among others.

Who has been – far and away – the loudest, most prominent, authoritative voice promoting the injections to the public?

Who terrorized mothers into injecting their children, whose risk of severe illness or death from COVID is statistically non-existent, with these products?

The shots can’t confer herd immunity because they don’t prevent transmission. As a Pfizer executive recently admitted, Pfizer never even tested their experimental product for the prevention of transmission.

Virtually every utterance that’s slipped through Fauci’s teeth since the rollout of the vaxxes has been inaccurate – always in the direction of encouraging mass vaccination, even in cases when the patient is not at any appreciable risk from COVID-19.

The consequences are deadly for some, as we’ve noted, but also severely debilitating for others.

Under Fauci’s guidance from his perch atop the NIAID, 2020 was the first time synthetic mRNA was tested as a pharmaceutical therapeutic on a mass scale in humans. Everyone who took it was part of the biggest experiment in medical history. Many of them had no idea what they were getting into – in part, because people like Fauci promised over and over that the product was thoroughly vetted.

This was a lie, and Fauci knew it was a lie when he told it. He is, after all, as the corporate media incessantly reminds the public, the preeminent American virologist.

Every other vaccine in history has taken 10-15 years to develop and fully test in multiple stages of clinical trials. His lie cost people their lives and livelihoods, which any reasonable person could have foreseen.

This meets the legal criteria for negligent homicide:

“A person acts with criminal negligence when his or her behavior is a gross deviation from the standard of care that a reasonable person would exercise in the same or similar situation. For example, if a driver kills a pedestrian while speeding through a residential area and blowing stop signs, he could be charged with criminal negligent homicide.”

No prosecutor, arguably, ever had more evidence against a defendant at his disposal to make his case in trial.

Here’s what we definitively know about the mRNA gene therapies that Fauci promoted and that his NIH profited to the tune of $400 million off of:

Perhaps most criminally, Fauci pushed mRNA injections on babies. who are at statistically negligible risk of death from the virus. And he did it without evidence demonstrating the efficacy of these injections in that age group.”

Bartee’s opinion, of course, but definitely food for thought, if one avoids the heartburn.

 

Comments

No comments made yet. Be the first to submit a comment
Already Registered? Login Here
Thursday, 28 November 2024

Captcha Image