Steve Kirsch has given the Covid vax establishment a put-your-money-where-your-mouth-is challenge, to have mandatory autopsies of people who die within two months of having a Covid vaccine. This would certainly clear up all the points about the vaxxes being safe or not. There could be an official investigation of the long stringy blood clot issue being seen by embalmers, who are at present keeping anonymous to keep their jobs. But it won’t happen, as it would blow the Covid vax safety issue out of the water.

https://stevekirsch.substack.com/p/a-simple-way-to-end-vaccine-misinformation?token=eyJ1c2VyX2lkIjozNDkxODExMCwicG9zdF9pZCI6NTA3NzQwMTQsIl8iOiJhd0QwaiIsImlhdCI6MTY0ODAwNDcwOCwiZXhwIjoxNjQ4MDA4MzA4LCJpc3MiOiJwdWItNTQ4MzU0Iiwic3ViIjoicG9zdC1yZWFjdGlvbiJ9.jQ5a86en9ZNTgCgBGFnXdvhNe19y-lClhBa9IGhd7d8&s=r

“A simple way to end vaccine misinformation immediately.

All a state has to do is MANDATE autopsies for anyone who dies within 2 months of a vaccination. The Medical Examiner would be required to make the results public.

If they really wanted to end vaccine misinformation, all they need to do is require autopsies that check for vaccine injury and publish the results

If they truly wanted to end vaccine hesitancy, all they have to do is require autopsies if you die within 60 days of vaccination and require the medical examiners to make the required tests to determine vaccine involvement (as doctors Bhakdi and Burkhardt have done) and publish them. Publishing a fraudulent report would be a criminal offense.

This would end the debate.

Or they could simply require all licensed embalmers to check for the telltale clots and make the numbers public. Again, it would be a crime to falsify reports.

Or they could do both.

Why don’t they do this?

I’ll tell you why they don’t do it: They don’t do it because they know the results would be devastating and would immediately halt the vaccine and discredit the FDA, CDC, the entire medical establishment, virtually all members of Congress, and the mainstream media.

Why doesn’t Florida Governor DeSantis require this in Florida? What is he afraid of? Why doesn’t Governor Newsom require this in California? What does he have to fear? DeSantis would be the most likely of any governor to do this. He could be a world hero if he did this.

Nobody wants transparency of the data. They all want to keep you in the dark.

My suggestion isn’t limited to the US.

Any public health official anywhere in the world could order this: local, state, federal.

A state or federal legislature could require it.

Any member of any legislature could introduce a bill.

Why are California Assembly member Evan Low and state Senator Dr. Richard Pan doing nothing? They have said they want to end medical misinformation. This is a perfect opportunity for them to walk the talk!

Why aren’t members of the medical community calling for this? Will any of these people join me in calling for this? Or will they sit on the sidelines and say nothing? …

Any public official could call for this: a mayor, city council member, board of supervisors, etc.

Pfizer and Moderna CEOs could call for this to prove to the world that their product is safe! What do they have to lose??

Any mainstream newspaper in the world could call for this.

Let’s be honest here. None of those people will call for transparency. They don’t want transparency. They all want to make sure nobody finds out the truth because when they do, all of these people will be discredited for years if not decades for their role in killing over 100,000 Americans.

Instead, you’ll get excuses like “we’d love to do this but don’t have the resources to do it.” Fine. Do 1 out of 10 autopsies picked randomly. Or 1 out of 100. Or cut the time to die to qualify to within two weeks after any COVID vaccine. Or shorter.

Instead of autopsies they rely on censorship: using hand-waving arguments to create fear, uncertainty, and doubt to discredit any study showing data that doesn’t fit the narrative

Instead of collecting the data in plain sight, what they do instead is write bogus fact checks such as this one from Reuters: Fact Check-A four-page, yet to be peer-reviewed paper is not proof that COVID-19 vaccines cause 93% of deaths that occur after inoculation.

Here’s what you need to know about that so-called “fact check”:

1. This is the same Reuters fact-checking organization that claims that “No evidence spike proteins from COVID-19 vaccines are toxic.” We would love to debate Reuters on this. Will they do it? No chance. Not for all the tea in China. Not ever gonna happen.
2. The researchers got the tissue samples sent to them. They had no role in the selection process and all deaths were determined not to have been vaccine caused. So there wasn’t a selection bias in the samples. As far as we all know the samples were all random.
3. Yes, their paper wasn’t peer reviewed which is typical because anything that goes against the narrative doesn’t get published. So you never get to peer review because no journal will touch this.
4. They never reached out to the authors of the study for comment. Isn’t that odd for a “fact check”?
5. They never reached out to me for comment either. I was mentioned but they never contacted me. I *love* talking to fact checkers as PolitiFact can attest when I recorded their fact checker who had no interest in finding the truth.
6. They claimed the CDC study disputes the Bhakdi resultsand it was well done. Are you kidding me?!?! There is no way that the CDC study could possibly be correct. It defies all logic. Anyone with a working brain can pick that study apart and show it is impossible. That’s what I did back on November 12, 2021 in my article FDA discovers Fountain of Youth. Apparently, the Reuters fact checker never saw my article. Again, I’d love to chat about that article on a recorded call. Can we do that?

I dare any fact checker from Reuters to call me up on the phone and have a conversation with me about the Bhakdi study or defend why we shouldn’t mandate autopsies so we can collect the information.

Summary

The government doesn’t want you to know the truth about vaccine safety. If they did, they would mandate autopsies and the required tests.

No government or public health official in the entire world will do anything to expose the truth about why people are dying after being vaccinated. Not at the federal, state, or local level. Nobody will do this because they will be fired immediately for suggesting that we should find the truth.

It’s not that they want to kill you. It’s that they don’t want you to know that they made a huge mistake by ignoring all the safety signals from doctors, VAERS, patient reports, and studies like those done by Dr. Peter Schirmacher, Dr. Sucharit Bhakdi, and others. Those doctors that did those studies have absolutely nothing to gain by lying to the public.

Dr. Peter Schirmacher is one of the world’s top pathologists. He believed the vaccine was safe because he was vaccinated himself before he did his study. He can’t be considered an “anti-vaxxer” by any stretch. Nobody can explain how he found what he did if the vaccines are safe. His family was threatened if he continued to speak out. So he stopped talking. That’s the way science works today.

The Federal Association of German Pathologists is also urging more autopsies of vaccinated people. This is the only way to exclude or prove connections between deaths and vaccinations, says Johannes Friemann, head of the autopsy working group in the association. However, from his point of view, too little autopsies are carried out to speak of an unreported number. “You don’t know anything yet.” General practitioners and health authorities need to be made aware of this. The federal states would have to instruct the health authorities to order autopsies on site. The Federal Association of Pathologists requested this in a letter to Health Minister Jens Spahn (CDU) in March. It went unanswered, says Friemann.

So the German pathologists want to know the truth, but clearly the government of Germany doesn’t want anyone to know, so they silenced Schirmacher and ignored the pathologists.

I hope that everyone reading this will share this on your social media accounts.

This article is simply a call for medical transparency which shouldn’t be a violation of “community standards.”

Perhaps your blue pill friends can explain to you why all these autopsy studies, all independent of each other, are finding such troubling results and why no government or health authority wants to know the truth. Ask them if it is OK to simply ignore a40% rise in death among those under 65 and not investigate to determine the cause.

 

https://doctors4covidethics.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/12/end-covax.pdf

 

“On COVID vaccines: why they cannot work, and irrefutable evidence of their causative role in deaths after vaccination Sucharit Bhakdi, MD and Arne Burkhardt, MD

 

 This text is a written summary of Dr. Bhakdi’s and Dr. Burkhardt’s presentations at the Doctors for COVID Ethics symposium that was live-streamed by UKColumn on December 10th, 2021. The two presentations can be viewed at the very beginning of the video recording of the symposium. The authors Dr. Bhakdi has spent his life practicing, teaching and researching medical microbiology and infectious diseases. He chaired the Institute of Medical Microbiology and Hygiene at the Johannes Gutenberg Unversity of Mainz, Germany, from 1990 until his retirement in 2012. He has published over 300 research articles in the fields of immunology, bacteriology, virology and parasitology, and served from 1990 to 2012 as Editor-in-Chief of Medical Microbiology and Immunology, one of the first scientific journals of this field that was founded by Robert Koch in 1887. Dr. Arne Burkhardt is a pathologist who has taught at the Universities of Hamburg, Berne and Tübingen. He was invited for visiting professorships/study visits in Japan (Nihon University), the United States (Brookhaven National Institute), Korea, Sweden, Malaysia and Turkey. He headed the Institute of Pathology in Reutlingen for 18 years. Subsquently, he worked as an independent practicing pathologist with consulting contracts with laboratories in the US. Burkhardt has published more than 150 scientific articles in German and international scientific journals as well as contributions to handbooks in German, English and Japanese. Over many years he has audited and certified institutes of pathology in Germany.

 

The evidence We herewith present scientific evidence that calls for an immediate stop of the use of gene-based COVID-19 vaccines. We first lay out why the agents cannot protect against viral infection. While no positive effects can be expected, we show that the vaccines can trigger self-destructive processes that lead to debilitating illness and death.

 

Why the vaccines cannot protect against infection A fundamental mistake underlying the development of the COVID-19 vaccines was to neglect the functional distinction between the two major categories of antibodies which the body produces in order to protect itself from pathogenic microbes. The first category (secretory IgA) is produced by immune cells (lymphocytes) which are located directly underneath the mucous membranes that line the respiratory and intestinal tract. The antibodies produced by these lymphocytes are secreted through and to the surface of the mucous membranes. 1 These antibodies are thus on site to meet air-borne viruses, and they may be able to prevent viral binding and infection of the cells. The second category of antibodies (IgG and circulating IgA) occur in the bloodstream. These antibodies protect the internal organs of the body from infectious agents that try to spread via the bloodstream. Vaccines that are injected into the muscle – i.e., the interior of the body – will only induce IgG and circulating IgA, not secretory IgA. Such antibodies cannot and will not effectively protect the mucous membranes from infection by SARS-CoV-2. Thus, the currently observed “breakthrough infections” among vaccinated individuals merely confirm the fundamental design flaws of the vaccines. Measurements of antibodies in the blood can never yield any information on the true status of immunity against infection of the respiratory tract. The inability of vaccine-induced antibodies to prevent coronavirus infections has been reported in recent scientific publications. The vaccines can trigger self-destruction A natural infection with SARS-CoV-2 (coronavirus) will in most individuals remain localized to the respiratory tract. In contrast, the vaccines cause cells deep inside our body to express the viral spike protein, which they were never meant to do by nature. Any cell which expresses this foreign antigen will come under attack by the immune system, which will involve both IgG antibodies and cytotoxic Tlymphocytes. This may occur in any organ. We are seeing now that the heart is affected in many young people, leading to myocarditis or even sudden cardiac arrest and death. How and why such tragedies might causally be linked to vaccination has remained a matter of conjecture because scientific evidence has been lacking. This situation has now been rectified.

 

Histopathologic studies: the patients Histopathologic analyses have been performed on the organs of 15 persons who died after vaccination. The age, gender, vaccination record, and time of death after injection of each patient are listed in the table on the next page. The following points are of utmost importance: · Prior to death, only 4 of the 15 patients had been treated in the ICU for more than 2 days. The majority were never hospitalized and died at home (5), on the street (1), at work (1), in the car (1), or in home-care facilities (1). Therefore, in most cases, therapeutic intervention is unlikely to have significantly influenced the post-mortem findings. · Not a single death was brought into any possible association with the vaccination by the coroner or the public prosecutor; this association was only established by our autopsy findings. · The initially performed conventional post-mortems also uncovered no obvious hints to a possible role of vaccination, since the macroscopic appearance of the organs was overall unremarkable. In most cases, “rhythmogenic heart failure” was postulated as the cause of death. 2 But our subsequent histopathological analyses then brought about a complete turnaround. A summary of the fundamental findings follows. Case # Gender Age (years) Vaccine (injections) Time of death after last injection 1 female 82 Moderna (1. and 2.) 37 days 2 male 72 Pfizer (1.) 31 days 3 female 95 Moderna (1. and 2.) 68 days 4 female 73 Pfizer (1.) unknown 5 male 54 Janssen (1.) 65 days 6 female 55 Pfizer (1. and 2.) 11 days 7 male 56 Pfizer (1. and 2.) 8 days 8 male 80 Pfizer (1. and 2.) 37 days 9 female 89 Unknown (1. and 2.) 6 months 10 female 81 Unknown (1. and 2.) unknown 11 male 64 AstraZeneca (1. and 2.) 7 days 12 female 71 Pfizer (1. and 2.) 20 days 13 male 28 AstraZeneca (1.), Pfizer (2.) 4 weeks 14 male 78 Pfizer (1. and 2.) 65 days 15 female 60 Pfizer (1.) 23 days

 

Histopathologic studies: findings Histopathologic findings of a similar nature were detected in organs of 14 of the 15 deceased. Most frequently afflicted were the heart (14 of 15 cases) and the lung (13 of 15 cases). Pathologic alterations were furthermore observed in the liver (2 cases), thyroid gland (Hashimoto’s thyroiditis, 2 cases), salivary glands (Sjögren`s Syndrome; 2 cases) and brain (2 cases). A number of salient aspects dominated in all affected tissues of all cases: 1. inflammatory events in small blood vessels (endothelitis), characterized by an abundance of Tlymphocytes and sequestered, dead endothelial cells within the vessel lumen; 3 2. the extensive perivascular accumulation of T-lymphocytes; 3. a massive lymphocytic infiltration of surrounding non-lymphatic organs or tissue with Tlymphocytes. Lymphocytic infiltration occasionally occurred in combination with intense lymphocytic activation and follicle formation. Where these were present, they were usually accompanied by tissue destruction. This combination of multifocal, T-lymphocyte-dominated pathology that clearly reflects the process of immunological self-attack is without precedent. Because vaccination was the single common denominator between all cases, there can be no doubt that it was the trigger of self-destruction in these deceased individuals.

 

Conclusion Histopathologic analysis show clear evidence of vaccine-induced autoimmune-like pathology in multiple organs. That myriad adverse events deriving from such auto-attack processes must be expected to very frequently occur in all individuals, particularly following booster injections, is self-evident. Beyond any doubt, injection of gene-based COVID-19 vaccines places lives under threat of illness and death. We note that both mRNA and vector-based vaccines are represented among these cases, as are all four major manufacturers.”