The Case for Health Freedom: Judy Wilyman’s Critique of Vaccine Mandates and Toxins, By Brian Simpson

In her Vaccination Decisions Substack Newsletter 313, published July 8, 2025, Judy Wilyman, PhD, delivers a compelling critique of Australia's vaccine policies, spotlighting the ethical violations embedded in mandatory vaccination programs and drawing a provocative parallel to the 2023 Leongatha mushroom murders. Wilyman argues that just as Erin Patterson was convicted on July 7, 2025, for deliberately poisoning three relatives with death cap mushrooms, the Australian government, under former Prime Minister Scott Morrison, has coerced healthy individuals into receiving vaccines containing toxins, without adequate evidence of safety or efficacy. Her work, rooted in her 2015 PhD research and 2020 book Vaccination: Australia's Loss of Health Freedom, challenges the erosion of medical autonomy and calls for a return to informed consent. This blog post supports Wilyman's perspective, stressing the need for transparency, accountability, and respect for individual health choices in the face of coercive policies.

Wilyman opens her newsletter by referencing the high-profile conviction of Erin Patterson, who was found guilty of three counts of murder and one count of attempted murder for serving a beef Wellington laced with death cap mushrooms, killing three of her estranged husband's relatives in July 2023. Scientific experts in the trial noted that individuals react differently to toxins based on factors like gender, race, age, weight, and genetics, a principle Wilyman argues is fundamental to medicine. This variability, she contends, underscores why ethical medical guidelines prohibit coercing or mandating drugs, as individual responses cannot be predicted with certainty. The Patterson case serves as a stark metaphor: just as deliberate poisoning with mushrooms led to tragic outcomes, Wilyman suggests that mandating vaccines with known toxins risks harm to diverse populations, particularly when long-term safety data is lacking.

Central to Wilyman's critique is former Prime Minister Scott Morrison, who received the Companion of the Order of Australia in 2025 for his tenure, which included controversial vaccine mandates. As Minister for Social Services in 2015, Morrison introduced the "No Jab, No Pay" policy, which withheld approximately $28,000 in financial benefits from families unless children received all 16+ vaccines on the national schedule from birth to 19 years. This policy, Wilyman argues, bypassed the Department of Health and lacked evidence justifying its blanket application, effectively coercing parents into compliance. Later, as Prime Minister in 2021, Morrison facilitated state premiers' mandates for the mRNA Covid-19 injections, which Wilyman describes as an experimental gene technology deceptively labelled a "vaccine" to imply safety and efficacy.

Wilyman asserts that these mandates violated medical ethics, which prioritise informed consent and individualised care. The Australian Health Practitioner Regulation Agency (AHPRA), she claims, silenced doctors who questioned vaccine risks, threatening deregistration and labelling dissent as "anti-vaccination material." This suppression, coupled with Morrison's policies, allegedly infringed on anti-discrimination laws, medical privacy legislation, and Australia's obligations under the Office of Gene Technology, which had not approved the mRNA technology for widespread use.

Wilyman highlights the presence of toxins like aluminium and thimerosal (a mercury-containing preservative) in vaccines, noting that children receive up to 24 doses in their first year, potentially accumulating harmful substances. She correlates the 2021 mRNA vaccine rollout with a 17-20% increase in excess deaths in Australia and other highly vaccinated countries, citing conditions like turbo cancers, myocarditis, blood clots, and neurodegenerative diseases. While mainstream narratives attribute rising cancer rates to long-term trends, Wilyman points to data suggesting a sharp increase from 2021 onward, aligning with the vaccine rollout. She questions why doctors and regulators dismiss these correlations, suggesting a cover-up to protect those responsible for the policies.

The ethical parallel to the mushroom murders is striking: just as Patterson's deliberate use of toxins led to accountability, Wilyman argues that governments mandating vaccines with known risks should face scrutiny. The lack of long-term safety data for mRNA technology, combined with its classification as a gene therapy rather than a traditional vaccine, fuels her call for choice in medical interventions. As she notes, "Who would have taken this injection if they knew it was a new genetically engineered technology, containing lipid nanoparticles, that had never been proven to prevent any COVID disease?"

Wilyman situates Australia's vaccine policies within a global framework, pointing to the World Health Organization's (WHO) International Health Regulations (IHR) as a driving force. She warns that amendments to the IHR, set to become binding unless rejected by July 19, 2025, threaten national sovereignty over health decisions. Her book, Vaccination: Australia's Loss of Health Freedom (2020), details how these policies erode autonomy, a process she traces back to her 2015 PhD research at the University of Wollongong. The book argues that Australia's vaccination program values corporate interests over public health, a claim supported by the financial incentives and penalties embedded in "No Jab, No Pay" and "No Jab, No Play" policies.

Wilyman's newsletter is a rallying cry for health freedom. She urges Australians to reject coercive mandates, demand transparency on vaccine ingredients, and hold regulators accountable. The ethical guidelines of medicine, she argues, exist to protect individuals from harm, yet Morrison's policies, celebrated with a national honour, allegedly flouted these principles. The Leongatha case underscores her point: if a single act of poisoning warrants life imprisonment, why are systemic policies that expose populations to untested toxins rewarded?

Her solution is clear: restore choice in medical interventions, scrutinise vaccine safety with independent research, and reject WHO directives that undermine sovereignty. By empowering individuals to make informed decisions, Australia can reclaim its health autonomy and prevent further harm. Wilyman's work, grounded in years of research, offers a roadmap for those seeking to navigate this complex landscape.

In conclusion, Judy Wilyman's critique, as articulated in Newsletter 313, is a principled stand against the erosion of medical ethics and individual rights. By drawing parallels between the deliberate poisoning in the Leongatha murders and the coercive administration of vaccines, she highlights a profound injustice: the violation of informed consent in the name of public health. Her call to action, supported by her PhD research and book, resonates with those who value transparency, accountability, and freedom. As Australia grapples with rising health concerns and global pressures, Wilyman's voice is a vital reminder that health policy must serve people, not power elites.

https://judyp.substack.com/p/death-cap-mushroom-murders-and-former

Toxins in Vaccines given to Healthy People

On the 7th July 2025 a mother was convicted of murder in the Australian courts for poisoning her lunch guests with death cap mushrooms. Three people died and one survived after a serious illness following the meal.

Bottom of Form

Scientific experts in the case admitted that each person reacts differently to the toxin in death cap mushrooms, according to their gender, race, age, weight and their own genetic makeup. This is a well known principle of medicine and it is why the ethical guidelines of doctors prevent them from coercing or mandating drugs in the human population. Genetic diversity in humans means we all react differently to drugs/vaccines.

Yet we have a former Liberal Prime Minister, Scott Morrison, who was given Australia's highest award, the Companion of the Order of Australia, for his time in office that included mandating and coercing a new genetically engineered mRNA technology (deceptively called COVID 'vaccines' ) on the entire Australian population.

Scott Morrison is also responsible for his role in mandating with financial coercion the entire childhood vaccination schedule of 16+ vaccines in children from birth to 19 years of age. This occurred in 2015 when he was the Minister for Social Services - not the Minister for Health.

How is your health since 2021 since the roll out of the jab? Vaccines contain multiple toxins, including neurotoxins (aluminium and thimerosal), in each vaccine, and each child gets up to 12 vaccines combined in the first year of life, approximately ~24 doses of vaccines.

In 2021 it was former PM, Scott Morrison, who permitted and facilitated the state premiers to mandate and coerce a genetically engineered modified mRNA drug, on the entire population. This was deceptively promoted to the public as a 'COVID19 vaccine'. It was claimed by the government to be a 'vaccine' so that people would assume it was 'safe and effective' when no data existed to support this claim. It was a new technology.

The mandating and coercing of this untested genetic technology (COVID 'vaccines') in the Australian population correlated directly to a 17-20% increase in excess deaths in Australia from 2021 onwards and in all highly vaccinated countries. Here are the statistics in Japan.

This included the premature deaths of many elderly people and a huge increase in deaths and illnesses in other demographics due to turbo cancers, myocarditis, aortic dissection, blood clots, heart attacks, strokes, infertility, anxiety, depression, Alzheimer, Motor Neurone Disease, and other neurodegenerative diseases etc.

Just ask yourself "who would have taken this injection if they knew it was a new genetically engineered technology, containing lipid nanoparticles, that had never been proven to prevent any COVID disease?" Did you know that since 2021, (the roll out of this jab), there has been a significant increase in cancers in all demographics? But particularly in young people. The mainstream media will have you believe that this significant increase has been over two decades, but in fact the statistics show a huge increase from 2021 onwards: the roll out of the COVID injections.

And the doctors response? "We don't know what is causing this significant increase in deaths and illnesses in all demographics". This is what happens when a major cause of deaths and illnesses is ignored by doctors and governments to protect them from the crime that has been perpetrated on the population.

Scott Morrison's government forced this untested jab on the entire Australian population by facilitating premiers to remove people from their jobs and ostracising them from society and from their families. This was a violation of the ethical guidelines that doctors are required to practice when treating their patients. It also violated the Fair Work Commissions anti-discrimination laws and medical privacy legislation but Scott Morrison's government and the medical regulator, AHPRA, facilitated these violations.

This drug/vaccine was an experimental gene technology that had not been approved by the Office of Gene Technology in Australia and had no short or long-term data to prove safety or efficacy.

The Minister for Health, Greg Hunt, told the Australian population in 2021 that the public would be participating in 'the largest global experiment ever' yet the Prime Minister at the time, Scott Morison, facilitated the premiers to coerce people into using the drug, by calling it a 'vaccine', and by removing them from their jobs with the threat of 'misconduct' on their professional records, and by preventing people's right to travel and participate in society; our fundamental human rights.

In 2025 former PM, Scott Morrison has received Australia's highest honour for his time in office and a mother in Australia has been imprisoned, possibly for life, for the murder of three people from toxins in a meal. If there are toxins in vaccines surely it is time to stop mandating these medications that are used in healthy children/adults? Choice in all medications is a fundamental human right that has been removed in government policies, not by medical doctors in the practice of medicine.

No Jab No Pay and Play: the Mandated Childhood Vaccination Program

It was also Scott Morrison, as Minister for Social Services (not Minister for Health) who implemented the No Jab No Pay Bill in the federal parliament in 2015 that coerced parents into using every vaccine on the national vaccination program. This policy uses financial incentives of ~$28,000 per child, to mandate the use of 16+ vaccines in children from birth to 19 years of age. This policy was not supported by evidence and it did not go through the Department of Health. This policy is a crime if it is causing chronic illness and death in a percentage of healthy children that is being ignored by the Australian government.

This meant that from 2016 onwards a child was not considered 'vaccinated' unless they had all 16 vaccines. The premiers extended this policy soon after (except the ACT) with the introduction of the No Jab No Play Bill that prevented attendance at childcare without all of the required vaccines.

The Medical Ethical Guidelines of Doctors

The Australian Medical Professional Board supported these vaccine mandates, that violate their own medial ethical guidelines, by claiming they are for the 'community good'; even though there was no clinical data to support this claim.

Any opposition to this claim was dismissed with derogatory terms such as 'antivaccination material' and doctors could be deregistered by the corporate regulator, AHPRA, if they discussed the risks of these genetic products. The word 'antivaxxer' was weaponised to ridicule individuals and to prevent others from critically thinking about the risks of these drugs, or so called 'vaccines', that are given to healthy people.

Please note that it is the World Health Organisation's (WHO) International Health Regulations (IHR) that are dictating these vaccination policies to all member countries and providing incentives for the countries that implement them. These WHO directives were non-binding in 2020, however amendments have been made to the IHR that need to be rejected by Australia by the 19th July 2025 if we are to maintain our sovereignty over our own health decisions.

My book - 'Vaccination: Australia's Loss of Health Freedom' published March 2020 is available on my website (Vaccination Decisions) and it is based on my PhD research published 2015."