The Business of Power: How Politics Became the Ultimate Investment, By Chris Knight (Florida)
Public office was once seen as a sacrifice — a call to service. Today, in many democracies, it's the smartest investment a person can make. From Washington to Canberra, politicians are leaving public life richer than some corporate CEOs, their fortunes multiplied not by invention or industry, but by access, timing, and influence.
Recent revelations from the United States — where one former House Speaker and her husband reportedly turned a modest stock portfolio into more than $130 million — have reignited debate about how deeply money and politics are entangled. Their returns outperformed the world's greatest investors and crushed every major market index. To achieve that level of success, you'd need either genius, luck, or information no one else has.
Insider Knowledge Without the Handcuffs
In the private sector, using inside information for profit is a felony. In politics, it's a grey zone, wrapped in excuses and legal loopholes. Lawmakers vote on bills that affect defence contractors, tech firms, and energy companies — and then buy or sell those same stocks, often within days.
Reform bills to ban congressional trading appear every few years, usually after public outrage peaks. Yet somehow, those bills always stall or die quietly in committee. The players police themselves — and find themselves innocent.
The same patterns appear everywhere: revolving doors between parliament and industry; ministers who regulate an industry one year and join its board the next; advisors whose "consulting firms" magically land lucrative contracts. It's corruption by another name — legal, systematic, and protected by the very people who benefit from it.
Australia: The Quiet Version of the Same Story
Australia's political landscape follows the same contours, only with less fanfare. The press occasionally notes that senior politicians leave office with multimillion-dollar property portfolios, luxury homes, and investment trusts far beyond what a public salary could explain. A few insiders are rumoured to have amassed wealth approaching $20 million or more — officially through "savvy investments," unofficially through the advantages of being close to the flow of information and influence.
It's an open secret that government connections are currency. Former ministers glide effortlessly into consultancy roles, board positions, and lobbying firms that represent industries they once oversaw. Decisions made in cabinet often echo later in corporate boardrooms — sometimes with the same names around the table.
Meanwhile, ordinary taxpayers get audited for a few hundred dollars' worth of deductions. The tax office pores over every small claim for stationery or travel, while the politically powerful live in what older Australians might call "grass houses" — mansions and estates that no plausible salary could justify. Everyone sees it, yet no one in authority seems to notice.
The Culture of Entitlement
This wealth accumulation isn't just about greed; it's about a deeper shift in political culture. Public service has become professionalised, careerist, and insulated. Politicians increasingly move straight from university politics to party staff roles, to parliament, and finally into corporate influence.
They never live under the rules they make. They don't navigate the tax system, the housing market, or the health system the way ordinary citizens do — and so their decisions often reflect a distant, detached view of public reality. It's not that every politician is corrupt, but that the structure rewards proximity to power far more than performance or integrity.
When journalists question this, they're accused of "class warfare." When the public demands reform, commissions of inquiry are launched — carefully worded, narrowly scoped, and safely forgotten within a year.
Global Corruption, Local Consequences
This isn't confined to the West. Across the globe, political office has become a gateway to wealth.
In parts of Asia and Africa, "public service" means access to contracts and kickbacks.
In Europe and North America, it means insider trading, speaking fees, and board seats.
In the developing world, corruption is often crude; in the developed world, it's refined, papered over by compliance frameworks and public-relations gloss.
But the outcome is the same: the wealthy and connected write the rules, and everyone else lives by them.
The Taxpayer's Double Standard
Nothing captures this better than the contrast in how different social classes are treated. Ordinary people face audits, penalties, and moral lectures for minor infractions. The powerful, on the other hand, display wealth far beyond official income — vineyards, investment properties, sports cars, art collections — without a hint of curiosity from regulators.
The message is clear: rules are for the ruled. Accountability is for those without connections.
Democracy's Dangerous Drift
Corruption doesn't always announce itself with bribes in envelopes or offshore accounts. The more dangerous form is systemic — when the enrichment of the political class becomes normalised and invisible. When politicians are allowed to profit handsomely from the very system they oversee, democracy becomes performance art: accountability on paper, enrichment in practice.
That's why public trust is collapsing. Voters don't believe that elected officials represent them anymore; they believe — often correctly — that politicians represent themselves. This cynicism feeds populism, conspiracy, and political extremism. When people feel the game is rigged, they stop playing by the rules.
The Way Forward: Real Reform or None at All
The solutions aren't complicated — just politically inconvenient.
Mandatory real-time asset and stock disclosures for all elected officials and their spouses.
True blind trusts, not the performative versions currently used.
Permanent bans on lobbying or corporate directorships for ex-ministers.
Automatic, independent tax audits of every member of parliament each year.
Criminal penalties for undisclosed conflicts of interest.
Such measures wouldn't eliminate corruption, but they'd make it harder to hide and far riskier to attempt. And that's the point — deterrence through daylight.
Conclusion: A Reckoning Long Overdue
The spectacle of politicians leaving office vastly wealthier than when they entered should outrage every citizen. It exposes the gap between the ideals of democracy and the reality of a political class that treats governance as a business plan.
Until there's genuine accountability — not self-regulation, not symbolic codes, but enforcement with teeth — politics will remain the most profitable career on earth. And the public will keep footing the bill, wondering when "public service" became just another word for self-service.
Comments