The Assassination of Charlie Kirk: A Harbinger of Brewing Civil War in America, By Charles Taylor and Chris Knight (Florida)

On September 10, 2025, the American political landscape was irrevocably altered when Charlie Kirk, the 31-year-old conservative activist and co-founder of Turning Point USA, was fatally shot during a speaking event at Utah Valley University. This brazen act of violence, carried out in front of a crowd of students and supporters, not only claimed the life of a prominent figure in Right-wing politics but also amplified the already simmering divisions within the United States. Kirk, known for his unapologetic advocacy of conservative values, his close ties to former President Donald Trump, and his role in mobilising young voters, became the latest victim in a series of high-profile attacks that have plagued the nation. As reactions poured in from across the political spectrum, the incident has sparked fears that the country is inching closer to a state of civil war, a slow-brewing conflict fuelled by Leftist ideological extremism, eroded trust in institutions, and a culture of escalating rhetoric.

Charlie Kirk rose to prominence as a key voice in conservative activism, founding Turning Point USA in 2012 at the age of 18. The organisation quickly grew into a powerhouse for promoting free-market principles, limited government, and traditional values on college campuses across America. Kirk's debates, podcasts, and social media presence made him a polarising figure: admired by the Right for his articulate defense of Trump-era policies and criticised by the Left for what many saw as inflammatory statements on issues like immigration, gender, and election integrity. His alliance with Trump was particularly notable; Kirk played a significant role in Trump's campaigns and was often seen as a bridge between the MAGA movement and younger generations.

Events like the one at Utah Valley University were typical of Kirk's approach, outdoor forums designed to engage students in lively, often contentious discussions. On that fateful day, Kirk was addressing a crowd when a single shot from a distance of 100-200 yards struck him, leading to his death. Authorities described it as a targeted assassination, with the shooter, dressed in dark clothing, escaping the scene. As of September 13, 2025, a manhunt remains ongoing, with no arrests reported. This incident echoes previous attempts on political figures, such as the two failed assassinations on Trump in 2024, highlighting a disturbing pattern of violence against conservative leaders.

The news of Kirk's death spread rapidly, eliciting a torrent of responses that underscored the nation's fractured state. President Trump, speaking from the Oval Office, expressed profound grief and anger, framing the assassination as an attack on American values and hinting at broader implications for political organising. On social media platforms like X, reactions ranged from condolences to outright calls for retaliation. One user described the event as "the turning point in American history," warning that "you can't shoot us all," while another lamented that "the demons cheer and celebrate" and that "they want us dead." More alarmingly, some posts advocated for violent responses.

Mainstream media coverage was equally divisive. Outlets like CNN and CBS reported on the manhunt and Kirk's legacy, while others, such as MSNBC, faced backlash for perceived anti-Trump commentary in the wake of the tragedy. Left-leaning commentators, including streamer Hasan Piker, interpreted Trump's statements as a signal for a crackdown on progressive movements. These responses illustrate how the assassination has not united the country but rather deepened existing trenches, with each side accusing the other of inciting violence.

The assassination of Charlie Kirk is not an isolated event but a symptom of deeper societal malaise that suggests a civil war may be slowly brewing in America. Political violence has escalated in recent years, from the January 6, 2021, Capitol riot to the attempted assassinations of Trump. Kirk's death adds to a grim timeline, reminiscent of historical precedents like the killings of Martin Luther King Jr. and Robert F. Kennedy in 1968, which preceded widespread unrest.

Several factors point to this brewing conflict. First, the polarisation of American society has reached unprecedented levels, with surveys indicating that a significant portion of both Democrats and Republicans view the opposing party as a threat to the nation's well-being. Rhetoric on social media amplifies this, turning ideological disagreements into existential battles. Kirk's assassination, occurring on a college campus, a supposed bastion of free speech, symbolises the erosion of civil discourse, where debate gives way to deadly force.

Second, the failure to apprehend the shooter promptly has fuelled conspiracy theories and distrust in law enforcement. Comparisons to past cases, where perpetrators were caught immediately or killed on site, have led to accusations of incompetence or bias. This mirrors broader institutional decay, including declining faith in elections, media, and the judiciary, which historically precedes civil strife.

Third, the incident exacerbates economic and cultural divides. Kirk's work focused on issues like campus free speech and anti-"woke" activism, resonating in red states like Utah, while alienating urban, progressive areas. As economic inequality grows and cultural wars intensify over topics like gun control, abortion, and immigration, events like this could ignite localised conflicts that spiral nationally.

While a full-scale civil war remains unlikely in the immediate future, as these things take time to fester before exploding. The slow brew is evident in increasing militia activity, stockpiling of arms, and calls for secession in some states. Historical analogies to the pre-Civil War era, with its assassinations and sectional tensions, are apt. If unaddressed through dialogue and reform, Kirk's death could mark the point where simmering discontent boils over into widespread unrest.

The assassination of Charlie Kirk is a tragic milestone in America's ongoing struggle with division and violence. It leaves behind a grieving family, Kirk is survived by his wife and two young children, and a nation grappling with its demons. Rather than a call to arms, this event should serve as a wake-up call for de-escalation, fostering unity across divides. Yet, the inflammatory reactions and underlying tensions suggest that, without intervention, a civil war, characterised not by traditional battlefields but by fragmented, ideological clashes, may indeed be brewing.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=goia3bx9aZ8

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NuMph1_yIZc

https://gellerreport.com/2025/09/leftists-and-muslims-celebrate-kirk-shooting.html/

https://gellerreport.com/2025/09/msnbc-villians-could-be-a-charlie-kirk-fan-shooting-in-celebration.html/?lctg=23533907

https://michaeltsnyder.substack.com/p/you-will-remember-exactly-where-you

"In fact, there are quite a few leftists on social media that are greatly celebrating that Kirk has died

Multiple TikTokers reacted casually to the shooting, with one mock crying while a dramatic song played, with the caption: 'Charlie Kirk got s**t? Awwww.'

'Hitler giving Charlie Kirk a tour in hell,' one liberal posted, adding a GIF from a TV show.

Others mocked Kirk's steadfast commitment to open debate and exchange of ideas: 'Why didn't Charlie Kirk just debate the bullet? he would have easily deflected.'

How disgusting is that?

But this is the society that we live in now.

We live in a society that is filled with hate, and that hate has been erupting in wild and unpredictable ways in recent months

The attacks include the assassination of a Minnesota state lawmaker and her husband at their house in June, the firebombing of a Colorado parade to demand Hamas release hostages, and a fire set at the house of Pennsylvania's governor, who is Jewish, in April.

The most notorious of these events is the shooting of Trump during a campaign rally last year.

Needless to say, President Trump is the number one target for the far left, and so he is going to have to be very careful from this point forward.

On Tuesday night, he went to Joe's Seafood with several members of his cabinet, and he was immediately confronted by crazed protesters

In a video posted on social media by Prem Thakker of Zeteo, protesters stormed the restaurant and chanted, "Free D.C., free Palestine, Trump is the Hitler of our time!"

In the video, which was seemingly recorded by one of the activists, Trump is seen entering the restaurant and walking toward a table. At one point, the president stops to face the camera directly and appears more amused than annoyed. After a few seconds, he motions toward security and says, "Come on."

"Let's go," a man tells the protesters. "Time to go, time to go."

Trump is very fortunate that nothing happened, because there are so many violent nuts out there these days.

As of early September, there had been 44 school shootings in the United States so far in 2025, and on Wednesday there was another one

Three teens have been hospitalized in critical condition after a shooting at a suburban Denver high school, authorities said Wednesday.

The shooting happened around midday at Evergreen High School in Evergreen, about 30 miles west of Denver, Jefferson County Sheriff's Office spokesperson Jacki Kelley said.

All those taken to the hospital are believed to be students, Kelley said. She did not immediately have details on their injuries.

So many of the school shootings that we have seen have been politically-motivated, and I certainly wouldn't be surprised if this one was politically-motivated too.

And even when violent acts have no political motivation at all, many on the far left feel like they have to insert politics into the conversation. For example, in response to the debate over the horrifying murder of Iryna Zarutska, Black Lives Matter posted a video clip that declares that "oppressed people have a right to violence"

Zarutska, 23, fled Ukraine in 2022 due to the war with Russia. She was fatally stabbed from behind multiple times on August 22 while riding Charlotte's Lynx Blue Line light rail train at the East/West Boulevard station.

Surveillance footage captured the unprovoked attack by suspect Decarlos Dejuan Brown Jr., 34, who has been arrested 14 times in the past, including prior assault and weapons charges, but remained free.

On Wednesday, just one day after the full video of the murder was made public, Black Lives Matter posted a clip from the 1983 film "Born in Flames," in which a black woman declares, "Right to violence. All oppressed people have a right to violence… It's like your right to pee. You gotta have the right place, Gotta have the right time."

Iryna Zarutska wasn't "oppressing" anyone.

She was a 23-year-old Ukrainian woman that had come to the United States to escape the terrible war in her own country.

How can anyone have a "right" to murder her?

But this is how divided our nation has become.

We have been trained to bitterly hate those on the opposite end of the political spectrum, and that is a horrible thing for our society.

The mainstream media has been stirring up this hate for years, and now we are seeing the consequences. As Jason Curtis Anderson has accurately observed, we are entering "a new era of civil terrorism"…

"The assassination of Charlie Kirk marks a dangerous escalation in America's culture war—where the battle of ideas is now escalating into political violence against those who run organizations devoted to debate and civil discourse. Very few people grasp the gravity of this moment . Incidents like this don't exist in isolation; they risk triggering a chain of events that can further destabilize the country.

Whether it's the anti-ICE movement, pro-Palestinian agitators, anarchist networks, or NGO-backed permanent protest groups like Indivisible, we are watching the rise of something new and deeply alarming. As @tal_fortgang wrote in @CityJournal, America is entering a new era of civil terrorism—where the goal is no longer peaceful protest, but intimidation, silencing, and destabilization of our democratic order."

When I first started reporting that groups on the far left were openly talking about the need for an internal "revolution", there were skeptics that felt that I was being way too alarmist.

But now look at what has happened.

They aren't going to stop. In fact, if they get their way they will throw this country into a state of complete and utter chaos.

From this point forward, please watch your back.

Our society is literally teeming with crazies, and they are becoming increasingly violent.

Javier Milei: My condolences to the family of Charlie Kirk and to all the young people in the world who admired him and listened to him. A formidable disseminator of the ideas of freedom and staunch defender of the West.

He was the victim of an atrocious murder in the midst of a wave of left-wing political violence across the entire region. The left is always, at all times and places, a violent phenomenon full of hatred. The entire world lost an incredible human being.

Goodbye.

https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2025/09/argentine-president-javier-milei-responds-charlie-kirks-assassination/ 

 

Comments

No comments made yet. Be the first to submit a comment
Already Registered? Login Here
Tuesday, 16 September 2025

Captcha Image