The Alarming Case Against COVID and mRNA Vaccines: A Call for Accountability, By Mrs. (Dr) Abigail Knight (Florida)
A ground-breaking peer-reviewed study published in the Journal of American Physicians and Surgeons should have sent shockwaves through the scientific and public health communities, but they are silent. Authored by 11 experts in science and law, the study makes a bold claim: the SARS-CoV-2 virus, responsible for the COVID-19 pandemic, bears hallmarks of "deliberate engineering." Even more concerning, it argues that the mRNA vaccines, designed to combat the virus, may be contributing to widespread health harms. These findings raise urgent questions about the origins of the virus, the safety of mRNA vaccines, and the ethical boundaries of gain-of-function research. It's time to take a closer look at these claims and their implications for public trust and global health.
A Virus Unlike Any Other
The study argues that SARS-CoV-2 exhibits genomic features that strongly suggest laboratory manipulation. One key piece of evidence is the virus's furin cleavage site, a feature that enhances its infectivity but is notably absent in naturally occurring SARS-like viruses. This, combined with traits that make the virus more transmissible and durable in air, five times more stable than other respiratory viruses, points to a pathogen that may not have evolved naturally. The authors cite peer-reviewed military studies that describe SARS-CoV-2 as an "attractive pathogen" due to its engineered-like characteristics, resembling a biological weapon.
These claims align with growing suspicions about the virus's origins, particularly the lab-leak theory. The study references Project DEFUSE, a 2018 proposal by the EcoHealth Alliance and Wuhan scientists to create coronaviruses with enhanced infectivity, including features like the furin cleavage site. While the proposal was rejected, it raises questions about what research was conducted behind closed doors. The paper also accuses key figures, including Dr. Anthony Fauci, of concealing evidence of such research, pointing to a February 2020 teleconference where doubts about the virus's natural origins were allegedly suppressed. This culminated in the influential Nature Medicine paper, "The Proximal Origin of SARS-CoV-2," which promoted a natural origin theory despite private concerns from its authors.
If true, these allegations suggest a violation of the Biological Weapons Convention, a treaty signed by nearly 200 countries to prohibit the development of biological weapons. The idea that SARS-CoV-2 could be the product of gain-of-function research, experiments that enhance a virus's transmissibility or virulence, is deeply troubling. Such research, often justified for vaccine development, carries immense risks, as the article argues, and may have led to a global catastrophe.
mRNA Vaccines: A Double-Edged Sword?
The study doesn't stop at the virus's origins. It also takes aim at the mRNA COVID-19 vaccines, which share the virus's spike protein, a feature the authors claim is responsible for widespread health harms. According to the paper, the rollout of these vaccines in 2021 coincided with alarming increases in serious health conditions. Data from the Defense Medical Epidemiology Database show spikes in myocarditis (151.4%), pulmonary embolism (43.6%), ovarian dysfunction (34.9%), and various cancers, including oesophageal (12.5%) and breast (7%) cancers. Reproductive harms, such as miscarriages and stillbirths, also reportedly surged, backed by data from sources like the Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS) and Pfizer's own clinical trial reports.
The paper points to the prolonged expression of the spike protein, detected over 700 days post-vaccination, as a potential driver of these harms. This "systemic toxicity," as described by lead author Dr. Andrew Zywiec, manifests in autoimmune diseases, cardiovascular issues, aggressive cancers, and reproductive complications. The authors argue that the decision to prioritise mRNA vaccines over other treatments, such as hydroxychloroquine, and to implement mass vaccination during a "pandemic," exacerbated these issues and eroded public trust.
A Breach of Trust and Ethics
Perhaps the most chilling aspect of the study is its assertion that both SARS-CoV-2 and the mRNA vaccines violate the Biological Weapons Convention. Dr. Joseph Sansone, a psychotherapist and co-author, calls this the first peer-reviewed article to label both the virus and the vaccines as biological weapons. This claim hinges on the idea that gain-of-function research, funded by institutions like the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases and conducted in places like the Wuhan Institute of Virology, deliberately created a dangerous pathogen. The subsequent cover-up, as alleged in the paper, delayed critical public health responses and allowed the virus to spread unchecked.
The study's call for action is unequivocal: an immediate halt to mRNA vaccine use, a moratorium on mRNA biologics, and comprehensive investigations into the motives behind these events. Co-author Dr. Irene Mavrakakis goes further, advocating for criminal prosecution of those responsible and the removal of legal immunity for vaccine manufacturers under laws like the US PREP Act. These demands reflect a broader frustration with a scientific and public health establishment that, in the eyes of the authors, chose experimental interventions over proven treatments and transparency.
Conclusion
The study's findings come at a pivotal moment. The U.S. Food and Drug Administration recently restricted COVID-19 vaccine authorisation to high-risk individuals, and the Department of Health and Human Services cancelled nearly $500 million in mRNA vaccine development contracts. These moves suggest a growing acknowledgment of concerns about mRNA technology. Meanwhile, President Trump's executive order pausing gain-of-function research signals a willingness to reassess the risks of such experiments.
Yet, as Dr. Karl Jablonowski of Children's Health Defense notes, the risks of gain-of-function research persist as long as labs remain vulnerable to leaks. The suffering caused by the COVID-19 pandemic, potentially linked to a single event at the Wuhan Institute of Virology, underscores the need for stricter oversight and ethical boundaries in scientific research.
The study's authors and supporters are not alone in their concerns. A growing chorus of scientists is calling for the suspension of mRNA vaccines, and public trust in institutions continues to wane. The allegations of deliberate engineering, suppression of evidence, and widespread health harms demand a thorough investigation. If even a fraction of these claims is true, the implications are staggering, not just for public health but for the future of scientific integrity and global safety.
As critical thinkers, we must demand transparency, accountability, and a commitment to safe, ethical science. The Journal of American Physicians and Surgeons study is a blazing call to action. It's time to listen, investigate, and ensure that such a "profound betrayal of trust," as Dr. Zywiec puts it, never happens again.
https://www.jpands.org/vol30no3/zywiec.pdf
"Compelling evidence shows that SARS-CoV-2 and SARSCoV-2 modified mRNA biologics/vaccines are products of gain-of-function (GOF) research, with genomic features and vaccine outcomes that suggest deliberate engineering rather than natural evolution. Far from benign, these vaccines have unleashed profound harm, disrupting nearly every system of the human body and contributing to unprecedented levels of morbidity and mortality. From autoimmune diseases and cardiovascular catastrophes to pregnancy complications and aggressive cancers, the pattern of systemic toxicity cannot be dismissed as coincidental. Urgent scrutiny and accountability are needed."
Comments