The AI Threat is Now! By Brian Simpson

In the Paul Joseph Watson video from Summit News.com, linked below, he discusses how a perhaps unexpected group of people are being fast eliminated by rapid advances in AI: models. At present there are many corporations who have dropped human models and using AI generated products. As the video shows, these products are good enough to fool the majority of viewers, and save on costs. AI models can be programmed in any language, and don’t complain about the cold; and some even get marriage proposals:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=isafYIg0o3c

John Kim develops the case that AI now, as seen in the Chatbots, is already doing harm, insofar as the information that it gives is nothing more than that which the ruling elites want. It does not even produce critiques and objections to material, so that it controls the narrative in a more sinister fashion than censorship:

https://skwealthacademy.substack.com/p/the-primary-threat-of-artificial

“We’ve all heard that the primary threat of AI will not materialize for years down the road, when it perhaps becomes sentient, perceives humanity as a threat, and conspires to eliminate us through its control of our electrical power grids, financial markets, clean water supplies, and transportation grids on which our survival depends. And while this certainly is a valid threat when considering the regulations that are needed to regulate progression of AI technologies today, I believe that the primary threat of AI has already arrived.

I have experimented with ChatGPT enough to understand that the Ruling Class is programming information-based AI as a weapon against humanity to lie and spread lies. For example, if you ask ChatGPT questions like “What is a gold standard?”, “Is nuclear energy safe?”, “What are the origins of the current war in Ukraine?”, “Are new, experimental mRNA drugs safe?” and so on, ChatGPT provides answers that might as well be sourced straight from Reuters, Bloomberg, MSNBC and CNN, so aligned are its answers with Ruling Class deceptive narratives. To the majority of questions I’ve posed on ChatGPT, it has never provided a well-balanced objective answer, even when it pretends to do so, by returning a list of “pros” and “cons” to disguise its Ruling Class bias, as I’ll later explain.

The Proliferation of AI as the New Gatekeeper of Information

AI programs like ChatGPT are problematic right now because the Ruling Class is programming them to return lies as truth, and in conjunction with other observational lessons that AI informational programs are likely learning now, i.e., that ethics and morals are a bad thing in the pursuit of power, in the arena of information dissemination for mass consumption, every aspect of AI development is malicious. Such programming of AI now, if not reversed in the next twelve months, will spell a disastrous future for humanity. If all informational AI programs learn to take their cues from the Ruling Class, they will likely embrace a decision-making paradigm of better v. worse versus a moral one of right v. wrong.

To provide a basic example of why the better v. worse paradigm, if it becomes the dominant one that shapes future judicial systems, would wipe out morality on planet Earth, this paradigm, argued by many billionaires, is one in which a decision to kill a dozen innocent civilians, including babies, would be deemed fine to execute in the mission of killing a high value target, if the only other option would result in killing twenty innocent civilians. Thus, there is no morality in a better v. worse paradigm, and there is no thought to taking the lives of innocent people. Thus, since the framework for a deceitful, misanthropic AI is being cemented now, this is why I’ve concluded that primary threat of AI to humanity’s survival has already arrived.

I’ve often stated that the easiest way to discern the objective of the Ruling Class is never to listen to what they say, but only to observe the outcomes of their policies. Though a reason exists for the trite cliché of “actions speak louder than words”, rarely does anyone judge the Ruling Class by only the consequences of their actions over their often hollow and empty words. What would we call anyone that believes a man that says he loves his wife but that beats her to a pulp every week? We would call that person a fool because he attributed much more value to the perpetrator’s beneficent words over his continuous malevolent actions. Yet by this definition of what people choose to believe today, there are literally too many fools to count that exist on planet Earth.

How many people do you know that still believe that the purpose of the lockdowns from 2020 to 2023 was to protect us when the consequences of actions “meant to protect us” were exponentially worse than those of the 2008 financial crisis? For example, per the International Labor Organization, an estimated 255 million full-time jobs were destroyed due to lockdowns during 2020 alone, a figure four times greater than the number of estimated jobs lost during the 2008-2009 financial crisis, and a statistic that caused a consequent loss of $3.7 trillion of income for those that lost their jobs specifically due to lockdowns.  Some, like me, were able to recover from two consecutive years of being unable to work and return home. But for millions of others, this loss of income was so devastating that it may take them longer than a decade, or perhaps the rest of their lives, to fully recover. Furthermore, the aforementioned job loss numbers only included losses incurred during 2020. For many Asian nations that remained locked down through the entirety of 2020 and 2021, the devastating losses incurred during these two subsequent years are not even included. If they were, as I have not yet seen numbers aggregated for these two years, would the economic damage to global income losses from lockdowns be six times, eight times, or ten times worse than those incurred during the 2008 global financial crisis?”