Tackling the Global Censorship Regime, By Chris Knight (Florida)

Ava Grace, writing at Natural News.com, "Trump Administration Takes on Global Censorship: A New Frontier for Free Speech Advocacy," published on February 24, 2025

https://www.naturalnews.com/2025-02-24-trump-administration-takes-on-global-censorship.html

outlines the Trump administration's early efforts in 2025 to combat what it perceives as global censorship, with a particular focus on Europe, framed as a defence of free speech.

The piece celebrates the Trump administration's launch of a "global campaign" to counter censorship, spotlighting an executive order signed shortly after Trump's January 20, 2025, inauguration. This order, titled broadly to "restore freedom of speech and end federal censorship," prohibits U.S. federal entities from actions that infringe on Americans' free speech rights and is portrayed as a bold stand against a growing international trend of speech suppression. The article frames this as a response to both domestic and global threats, with Vice President J.D. Vance's speech at the Munich Security Conference serving as a key moment to signal U.S. intent to challenge European censorship policies. Signed days after Trump's inauguration, the Executive Order on Free Speech bans federal officials from engaging in, facilitating, or funding activities that "unconstitutionally abridge" free speech. It's described as a direct counter to the Biden administration's alleged collusion with social media to suppress dissent, particularly around Covid-19 vaccines and election integrity.

The White House claims it addresses a four-year period under Biden where federal pressure led to content moderation on platforms, targeting conservative voices. The order also tasks Attorney General William Barr with investigating past censorship by the Biden administration. Conservative lawmakers and free speech advocates laud it as fulfilling Trump's campaign promises.

At the Munich Security Conference (held February 14–16, 2025), Vance shifted focus from traditional threats (Russia, China) to Europe's "aggressive censorship." He cited cases like a British veteran convicted for silent prayer near an abortion clinic and a Finnish MP charged with "hate speech" for a Bible verse post.

Vance argued that silencing dissent—rather than addressing concerns—erodes democracy, a critique aimed at European laws like the EU's Digital Services Act (DSA). He positioned the U.S. as a defender of free expression, contrasting it with Europe's "technocratic" slide. The speech "horrified" European leaders, per a Natural News claim, signalling a U.S. intent to pressure allies on speech policies.

The article frames the DSA, effective since 2022 and enforced more stringently by 2025, as a censorship tool forcing platforms to remove "disinformation" and "hate speech," often at the EU's discretion. It's accused of chilling American speech via tech compliance. House Judiciary Chairman Jim Jordan's letter to the European Commission and a committee hearing on the "Censorship-Industrial Complex" highlight U.S. resistance. The Trump administration's campaign is pitched as a global pushback.

The piece ties Trump's efforts to America's First Amendment tradition, casting the U.S. as a historical free speech beacon now confronting digital-age threats. It notes platforms like Meta easing misinformation policies, suggesting this stems from fear of Trump's administration rather than principle. Mark Zuckerberg's cited shift to "free expression" is framed as a win for the campaign.

The article argues this marks a pivot in U.S. diplomacy, prioritising free speech advocacy over traditional security concerns. It's portrayed as a fulfillment of Trump's populist base while challenging globalist norms. Europe's discomfort—especially over Vance's remarks—hints at strained relations.

The piece hails Trump and Vance as champions of liberty, using triumphant language ("significant move," "powerful speech") to elevate their actions. Six weeks + into his presidency, Trump's administration is flexing populist muscles—DOGE audits, immigration crackdowns—making this free speech push a consistent theme. Europe's tightening digital laws (e.g., DSA fines in 2024) and U.S. debates over Big Tech (e.g., CISA shakeups) provide fertile ground for this narrative. In sum, the article portrays the Trump administration's free speech efforts as a bold, historic stand against global censorship, spotlighting Europe's DSA and leveraging Vance's Munich moment. It's a rallying cry for supporters, rooted in some alarming real events.

https://www.naturalnews.com/2025-02-24-trump-administration-takes-on-global-censorship.html

"In a significant move signalling a renewed commitment to free speech, the Trump administration has launched a global campaign to combat censorship, particularly in Europe. This effort comes on the heels of President Donald Trump's executive order signed just days after his inauguration, which prohibits the federal government from engaging in, facilitating, or funding any conduct that would abridge the free speech of American citizens.

A strong stance at the Munich Security Conference

The administration's commitment to free speech was on full display last week when Vice President J.D. Vance delivered a powerful speech at the Munich Security Conference. Rather than focusing on traditional threats from Russia and China, Vance turned his attention to a growing menace in Europe: aggressive censorship.

"Dismissing people, dismissing their concerns, or worse yet, shutting down media, shutting down elections, or shutting people out of the political process protects nothing. In fact, it is the most surefire way to destroy democracy," Vance declared. His remarks highlighted the erosion of free speech in Europe, a region that shares many fundamental values with the United States.

One of the most egregious examples Vance cited was the case of British Army veteran Adam Smith-Connor. In November 2022, Smith-Connor was charged for violating a "buffer zone" outside an abortion clinic in the UK, where he had been silently praying. He was criminally convicted for this act, and his appeal will be heard in July. This case, along with others like that of Finnish Parliament member Päivi Räsänen, who has faced "hate speech" charges for posting a Bible verse, illustrates the systematic attempts to censor and control public discourse in Europe.

The Digital Services Act: A threat to free speech

Vance also criticized the European Union's Digital Services Act (DSA), which imposes heavy penalties on large social media companies for failing to censor "illegal content." This vague and subjective term can include anything from "hate speech" to "misinformation," often weaponized against disfavored religious and political views. The DSA's impact could extend beyond Europe, potentially censoring American voices as well.

"America cannot and will not accept that," Vance emphatically stated, underscoring the administration's resolve to protect free speech both domestically and internationally.

Bipartisan congressional support

The Trump administration is not alone in its efforts. Congressman Jim Jordan, Chairman of the House Judiciary Committee, has been a vocal critic of the DSA. In a letter to the European Commission, Jordan expressed serious concerns about how the act's censorship provisions affect free speech in the United States. The Judiciary Committee also held a hearing on the "Censorship-Industrial Complex," further highlighting the global nature of the issue.

President Trump's executive order has received widespread support from conservative lawmakers and free speech advocates. However, it has also faced criticism from those who argue that it could enable the spread of "misinformation" and "disinformation." Despite the controversy, the administration remains steadfast in its commitment.

A broader context: The history of free speech

The importance of free speech is not a new concept. It has been a cornerstone of American democracy since the nation's founding, enshrined in the First Amendment of the Constitution. Historically, the U.S. has played a leading role in defending free speech internationally, recognizing it as a fundamental human right. The Trump administration's efforts are a continuation of this legacy, particularly in light of recent global trends toward censorship.

The rise of digital platforms has complicated the free speech landscape. While these platforms have democratized information sharing, they have also become battlegrounds for speech regulation. The Trump administration's push to protect free speech in the digital age is a response to these new challenges, aiming to ensure that the foundational principles of American democracy are not eroded in the 21st century.

A new era of free speech advocacy

The Trump administration's commitment to combating global censorship marks a significant shift in U.S. foreign policy. By taking a strong stand against the Digital Services Act and other forms of speech regulation, the administration is fulfilling its promise to protect and promote free speech both at home and abroad. As Vice President Vance aptly put it, "America will take the lead again in ensuring the protection of free speech for Americans and worldwide."

This new era of free speech advocacy is not without its challenges, but it represents a vital step in preserving the democratic values that have long defined the United States. The world is watching, and the outcome of this battle could have far-reaching implications for the future of free expression globally.