Switzerland Halts the Covid Vaccinations By Richard Miller (London)

Switzerland has shown wisdom, at last, in stopping the Covid vaccinations, with doctors only able to administered the shots under special circumstances. While such a cessation has occurred now in other parts of Europe, what is newsworthy about this story is that doctors will face the risk of liability for damages arising from the vaccine, if they violate the principles of their duty of care to patients. The Swiss Federal Office of Public Health (BAG) and the Federal Commission for Vaccination Issues (EKIF) now hold that there is no longer a positive benefit-risk ratio for the Covid vaxxes. While Big pharma swims free once more, all of this certainly ends the Covid narrative, at least for the Swiss. This should serve as a lesson for other vax-mad jurisdictions, such as Briton, and Australia, but it probably won’t.

https://report24.news/paukenschlag-schweiz-zieht-saemtliche-covid-impfempfehlungen-zurueck/

“Switzerland stops the Covid vaccinations: all vaccination recommendations have been withdrawn, doctors can only administer the controversial vaccines in individual cases under certain conditions - but then bear the risk of liability for vaccination damage. When will countries like Germany and Austria follow this example?

The Federal Office of Public Health (BAG) and the Federal Commission for Vaccination Issues (EKIF) state, as of 3.4.23, in their vaccination recommendation.

In principle, the FOPH and EKIF will not formulate a recommendation for vaccination against Covid-19 in spring/summer 2023 due to the expected low virus circulation and the high level of immunity in the population.

Vaccination is only possible in individual cases – namely:

Vaccination is possible for people who are particularly at risk (BGP) ≥ 16 years of age if the attending physician considers it to be medically indicated in the respective epidemiological situation in the individual case, a temporarily increased protection against serious illness is to be expected and the last vaccination dose at least 6 months ago.

However, no vaccination recommendation for risk patients is explicitly given here.

In the following, it will be discussed that the effectiveness of vaccinations against current variants is reduced and short-lived – especially for people who are at risk. The adaptation of the mRNA vaccine could not keep up with the development of the variants. The BAG's recommendations could change if there was a new wave of outbreaks, but even then, according to the document, vaccinations are no longer recommended for people under the age of 65.

No positive risk-benefit ratio

The remarks on “adverse effects of vaccination” (UIE) are also piquant:

According to the current state of knowledge, the risk of severe UIE with a recommended vaccination is much lower than the risk of a complication from Covid-19, against which the vaccination protects. The benefit of the vaccination administered according to the recommendation therefore outweighs the possible risks.

In the case of the valid non-recommendation, this essentially means that there is no longer a positive benefit-risk ratio for any Covid vaccination.

Liability: the federal government is out, doctors have a duty

The new recommendations also have consequences for liability. This is what the BAG document on the Covid vaccination strategy (as of November 29th, 2022) says:

Compensation by the federal government to injured persons for vaccination damage can only be considered for vaccinations if they were officially recommended or ordered (see Art. 64 EpG).

However, the federal government only stepped in if the damage was not covered by the vaccine manufacturer, the person vaccinating or an insurance company. The person vaccinating - i.e. generally the doctor - can be held liable if he has violated the duty of care. In this context, it is pointed out that the same rules regarding patient information apply to the Covid vaccination as to all other vaccinations.”