Swedish Concerns Over Pfizer Vax By Richard Miller (London)
Following the controversy over a Pfizer subcontractor being accused of falsifying data, a group of 16 Swedish doctors and researchers have circulated a petition calling on the Pfizer jab to no longer be administered in Sweden. “For instance, in Sweden alone during the ten months that vaccination has taken place wholly 83,744 suspected side effects have been reported – which is more than ten times more than all side effects reported for all drugs and vaccines per year in the immediately preceding years, for a total of about 25,000 substances, the authors emphasized,” Sputnik said.
https://www.naturalnews.com/2021-11-11-swedish-doctors-want-pfizer-covid-jab-banned.html
“A Pfizer subcontractor is being accused of falsifying data, unblinding patients, hiring inadequately trained vaccinators and failing to follow up on adverse events during the company’s Wuhan coronavirus (Covid-19) “vaccine” clinical trials.
A paper published in the British Medical Journal (BMJ) reveals that the company, called Ventavia Research Group, heavily manipulated the phase III study for Pfizer’s Chinese Virus injection during the fall of 2020, just months before it was rushed into production and distribution at “warp speed” by the Trump administration.
A company whistleblower came forward with the revelations, which prompted a group of 16 Swedish doctors and researchers to circulate a petition calling on the Pfizer jab to no longer be administered in the Nordic country.
“The staff who performed quality checks were reportedly overwhelmed by the amount of problems they discovered,” reported Sputnik News. “The BMJ (study) concluded that the trial raised questions about data integrity and regulatory oversight.”
The 16 signatories of the petition called the revelations “extremely serious,” adding that the side effects associated with Pfizer’s injections are “gigantic.”
“For instance, in Sweden alone during the ten months that vaccination has taken place wholly 83,744 suspected side effects have been reported – which is more than ten times more than all side effects reported for all drugs and vaccines per year in the immediately preceding years, for a total of about 25,000 substances, the authors emphasized,” Sputnik explained.
Pfizer does whatever it wants because the FDA lets it
Not only do the Pfizer injections pose serious risks to the general public, but the revelations also undermine public confidence in the company’s drug offerings. How many trials for other drug and vaccine products were manipulated in a similar manner?
The 16 signatories say that it is now clear that Pfizer’s phase III clinical trial was “not performed in a scientifically acceptable manner.” This also means that its results “cannot be considered reliable:
“… combined with the large extent of reported suspected adverse reactions after vaccination, including many of serious nature, makes us, doctors, researchers and immunologists deeply concerned, not least for children who are at extremely low risk of serious COVID-19 disease, but who are at risk of serious side effects,” the signatories added.
Until a proper risk-benefit analysis can be conducted on the Pfizer jab, the signatories are calling for an immediate moratorium on the drug for all age groups.
The whistleblower, Brook Jackson, has since been fired from her position as regional director at Ventavia, which is based in Texas. Jackson’s firing reportedly occurred almost immediately after she filed a complaint with the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) about the situation.
Jackson provided BMJ with dozens of internal company documents, photos, audio recordings and emails that substantiate her claims. The FDA did not want to hear about any of it, however.
Pfizer is also ignoring Jackson’s concerns as it pushes to expand the number of injection doses it produces in 2021 from 2.5 billion to three billion. Next year, Pfizer also plans to manufacture four billion doses of its injection, up from a projected three billion doses.
“These jabs are just another weapon of mass destruction,” wrote one Sputnik commenter.
“It is well past time to end these death-in-a-bottle jabs of experimental gene therapy that have been proven not to work,” wrote another.
“Ventavia is typical of American corporate corruption,” wrote yet another. “The Swedes should look into using the safe vaccines, such as Sputnik, and scrap their three side effect-producing, ineffective Pfizer, Moderna, and AstraZeneca injections.”
Another noted that it is well past time for a second round of Nuremberg Trials to deal with this persistent problem of corporate corruption.
https://www.naturalnews.com/2021-11-11-pfizer-falsified-trial-data-vaccine-adverse-effects.html
“A private clinical research company involved in the Pfizer Wuhan coronavirus (COVID-19) vaccine trial in the fall of 2020 falsified phase-three trial data and neglected participants who experienced adverse events.
This is according to the testimony of whistleblower Brook Jackson, a clinical trial auditor with more than 15 years of experience in clinical research coordination and management. Jackson worked for Ventavia Research Group, a clinical research company based in Texas, for two weeks in Sept. 2020.
During her stint at Ventavia, Jackson repeatedly alerted her employer to the overwhelming number of problems in quality control of the trial. She even emailed her complaints to the Food and Drug Administration (FDA). But all of her concerns were ignored and her employer fired her on the same day she reported her concerns to the FDA.
Paul. D. Thacker, who handled the BMJ’s report on Jackson’s testimony, wrote that the medical journal is in possession of “dozens of internal company documents, photos, audio recordings and emails” – thanks to Jackson.
One of the photos in the BMJ’s possession reportedly shows “vaccine packaging materials with trial participants’ identification numbers written on them left out in the open, potentially unblinding participants.”
Keeping trials double-blind is an important aspect that maintains the integrity of randomized control trials. It protects data from being influenced by bias, and researchers dedicated to science and facts should at all times maintain the blinding of research facilitators and participants.
But when Jackson took the photo of the packaging materials, Ventavia executives questioned her and reprimanded her.
Patrick Delaney, writing for Life Site News, pointed out that some clinical research companies may have financial incentives to break research protocols and unblind participants to produce outcomes favorable to their clients. “In this case, Pfizer, and their knowledge of trial participants’ status may bias them in how they collect data,” he wrote.
According to Jackson’s email to the FDA, she had many other issues regarding Ventavia’s Pfizer trial, including:
- Post-injection participants were ignored by clinical staff.
- Patients who experienced adverse reactions to the vaccinations were not followed-up with on time.
- Protocol deviations were not being reported.
- Vaccines were not stored at proper temperatures.
- Laboratory specimens were routinely mislabeled.
- Ventavia executives harassed staff who reported concerns about the way the trial was conducted.
Corruption in clinical trials is an old issue due to Big Pharma
Dr. Aseem Malhotra, a British cardiologist and author, called the BMJ’s investigation “devastating” to Pfizer. “Where is the FBI? Why is there not a criminal investigation looking into this?” he asked.
Malhotra pointed out that, as a doctor who has long campaigned against Big Pharma, the fact that the BMJ‘s investigation is being swept under the rug is not surprising.
“It’s not really that surprising, even though it’s shocking, because if you look at the history of drug companies generally, there has been a problem for a very long time with corruption of data, hiding data on harms, not sharing data,” he said. “Which then means that doctors and patients are basically having to make decisions on biased information.”
“And when I say that this hasn’t been rectified, that’s the other issue,” continued Malhotra. “Between 2009 and 2014, for example, most of the top 10 [largest] pharmaceutical companies paid a total $13 billion in fines for criminal activity, which involves hiding data on harms and illegal marketing of drugs, for example. There’s nothing being done to rectify this situation.”
During a different interview, Malhotra called the BMJ’s report “absolutely shocking.”
“This should be major international news,” he said. “That Pfizer trial, that pivotal trial because of that data, millions and millions of people have taken the vaccine.”
Malhotra himself said that Pfizer’s phase-three clinical trial data convinced him to receive both doses of the vaccine “very early on” despite the fact he was not high risk, to protect his parents from getting COVID-19.
“What’s now very clear is that there’s no significant reduction in transmission from taking the vaccine,” he said.
Malhotra pointed out that until effective intervention or sanctions are placed upon the largest players in the pharmaceutical industry, the publication of corrupted trial data by Big Pharma will most likely continue.
He cited the example of GlaxoSmithKline, a British Big Pharma company that was fined $3 billion in 2012. “They made $25 billion in profit during the period covered by the settlement,” he said. “Nobody was fired, nobody was jailed. So this is business as usual for many of these companies.”
https://www.bmj.com/content/375/bmj.n2635
Comments