Steve Kirsch Asks: Is it Too Hard? By Brian Simpson
Covid vax critic, Steve Kirsch has asked health authorities across the world to make vaccine/death data available. He is usually ignored, but when governments respond, it is proclaimed that they are just too busy, and under-resourced to dig out the requested information. One wonders what they are doing with all the time on their hands? Oh, oppressing us, I suppose! It is a common complaint. But, really the main reason is, that they simply do not want to hand out any ammunition for critics.
“Executive summary
I’ve been asking health authorities around the world to free the data on vaccine/deaths and make it publicly available.
Generally, they don’t respond. If they do respond, they’ll cite privacy reasons. When I explain how to avoid that, they stop talking to me.
New Zealand said it was too much work to gather the data (a simple database JOIN) that would be needed for an accurate assessment. So New Zealand is flying “blind” on the vaccine. No need to look at the data. Just trust the drug companies. So I offered to pay their expenses. We’ll see where that goes.
Whose responsibility is it to show the safety efficacy data?
The governments aren’t exposing the data, so they don’t think it is their responsibility.
The drug companies aren’t calling for this data to be exposed either, so they don’t think they are responsible.
The doctors and medical community aren’t curious about this data, so they don’t think they are responsible.
So I guess it’s “misinformation spreaders” such as myself who are responsible for this.
How much work is it to extract the data?
It’s a simple JOIN between two database tables. It’s not rocket science. And the data can easily be anonymized once extracted. If the tables are well constructed, the task can be done in 3 hours, maybe a bit more, depending on how fancy you want to get with the data obfuscation.
Response from the UK:
I asked the UK ONS to make the vax-death record level data publicly available, but they said they couldn’t due to data privacy issues (citing the Statistics and Registration Service Act 2007).
I explained how those requirements can be easily surmounted.
They stopped replying to me.
Response from New Zealand:
I asked the New Zealand authorities for the same data.
Steph responded that “The Programme is not able to provide the detailed data you have requested, as this cannot be made available without substantial collation or research.”
Got it.
So they are spending billions to roll out these vaccines but they just admitted that they haven’t done a simple JOIN operation on the two key two database tables (which is a relatively simple task) in order to see if it worked or not.
So they don’t have the “gold standard” data to make a reliable assessment of safety or efficacy because it would be too much work. So they are assuming it’s safe.
I enjoyed my recent vacation in New Zealand, so I offered to pay all costs to get it done.
I’ll let you know if I hear back.
What do you think?”
I think that they are making an excuse for covering up. But, then again, they probably are lazy too.
Comments