Ruled by Thieves: Stats on Voter Perception of Voter Fraud By Chris Knight
At last the penny seems to have dropped, with nearly half of all us US voters seeing mail in voting, produced as part of the CCP virus conspiracy led to voter fraud. And conservatives are starting to realise that the elites hate white people. What took them so long?
“A new Rasmussen Reports national telephone and online survey finds that 57% of Likely U.S. Voters say Biden won the 2020 presidential election fairly, but 61% of Republicans say Biden did not win the election fairly. The impeachment case presented by House Democrats in the Senate trial accuses Trump of making false claims about election fraud that incited his supporters to riot at the Capitol on January 6. But 34% of voters say Biden did not win the election fairly, including 36% of voters not affiliated with either major political party.”
“This was best articulated—though you have to read between the lines—by NBC political correspondent Kelly O’Donnell [Tweet her] when she was interviewed on NBC News on the morning of February 11th.. O’Donnell explained that Trump’s political career has been marked by:
…saying things that others would fear to say and recoil at saying; talking about rigged elections . . . The idea of saying that something is rigged for most politicians would be a step too far. For Donald Trump, as a candidate and president, he was certainly willing to blow past those lines of normalcy and sort of discretion and the frequency of repeating it really created a bond with his supporters. [My transcription].
Saying these things, according to O’Donnell, caused Trump’s supporters to question the sacred cow of whether American elections were genuinely fair, infuriating them, and leading to the “insurrection” that was indeed—according to O’Donnell—a “threat to democracy.”
O’Donnell’s choice of words was absolutely fascinating. Presumably, it must be accepted that it is possible for elections to be rigged. There is clear evidence for this in Russian and Ukrainian elections [The Forensics of Election Fraud, by Mikhail Myagkov et al., 2010] and widespread fraud in British European Parliament elections has been reported and analyzed [Explaining electoral fraud in an advanced democracy, by Eleanor Hill et al., British Journal of Politics and International Relations, 2017].
But when it comes to America, even if there has been electoral fraud and even if an election has been rigged, O’Donnell thinks that “most politicians” will “recoil” from publicly asserting it. And they will do so because they are responsible adherents to America’s Civil Religion. They accept that, for the good of all of us in the ruling class, the myth that America is a democracy must be maintained, lest the “mobs”—of rednecks, hicks, and trailer trash—feel that they are not part of a “special nation” and so cannot be held in psychological bondage.
So, even if there has been a rigged election—or even if you genuinely believe that an election has been rigged—you should surely have enough “discretion” to not go public about it.
In much the same way, Medieval theologians would have detailed debates about the nature of God, whether transubstantiation was possible, and the truth, or otherwise, of parts of the Bible. But you didn’t go public about it. The Bible remained in Latin, un-translated, precisely so that the mob couldn’t understand it and, so, couldn’t start questioning the very basis of the “civil religion” of the time.
Medieval theologians had sufficient “discretion” to realize how disastrous it might be for the ruling class and for general order if they “went public.” This is why, when they increasingly started doing so, that same ruling class had them executed as heretics. (See Terry Jones et al., Who Murdered Chaucer? 2004.)
Richard Nixon certainly suspected that the 1960 election—which John F. Kennedy won, it is easy to forget, by a mere 0.17 percent of the popular vote— was stolen from him by fraud in Chicago Mayor Richard Daley’s Illinois and Vice President Lyndon B. Johnson’s Texas. However, he didn’t rock the Ship of State by going public about it. (Indeed, he subsequently intervened with journalist Earl Mazo’s editors to stop the publication of a series of articles documenting that voter fraud had cost Nixon the election on the grounds that “our country can't afford the agony of a constitutional crisis—and I damn well will not be a party to creating one, just to become president or anything else").
Nixon had too much “discretion” to do anything like that. Nixon simply bided his time and won in 1968.
Some people might suggest that the same was true of Al Gore with regard to Florida in the 2000 election. Unlike Nixon, Gore did fight, but in the end he gracefully accepted the Supreme Court’s decision, though he surely believed—perhaps correctly—that it was unfair and that he was the rightful president.
It is certainly true that more people voted for Gore nationwide than voted for Bush. For many observers, the very fact that a presidential candidate can win the popular vote and lose the election is the essence of a system that it is not “democratic.” (Of course, this misunderstands the principle of federalism, but that’s a sophisticated concept). On this basis, Hilary Clinton would have had a “democratic” right to contest the result of the 2016 presidential election. If she had lacked “discretion,” and had thus done so openly—rather than conspiring covertly with intelligence agencies to entrap Trump in an impeachable offense—we can only imagine how the MSM might have reported any resultant “insurrection,” likely from an Antifa and ethnic minority mob.
To give another example, up until the 1960s America was waxing lyrical about how “democratic” it was while the system in the Southern States prevented numerous people, who had the legal right to vote, from voting at all.
Ironically, of course, it is that fact that fraud occurs mostly in minority areas that now inhibits Republicans, who are terrified of being called “racist,” from defending themselves effectively.
Although Americans aren’t generally aware of it, international analyses have concluded that America is the one of the least democratic countries in the “democratic” category of countries. It is only just about possible to call it democratic at all. According to the Electoral Integrity Project’s analysis, the US came near the bottom of this second highest group for honest elections, tying with Mexico. This because a number of factors frowned on by international observers open it up to electoral fraud. These include: no voter ID, mail-in ballots, duplicate registration, election observers being prevented from observing, unreliable voting machines, the media calling results while some areas are still voting and so literally influencing the election, and voter fraud not being prosecuted often enough.
But of course voter fraud can’t be prosecuted. To admit that it happens would be to admit that a component of the American Civil Religion is nonsense [Electoral Integrity Worldwide by Pippa Norris and Max Gromping, May 2019].
This is why Trump was on trial. He has committed heresy against the Civil Religion. Worse than that, this heresy has resulted in firing up a mob of working-class people in a country where another myth is that there is no class system and that everybody can attain the American Dream if they’d just work hard enough.
Trump was on trial for confronting the indoctrinated with the empirical truth, that American democracy is a sham, and thus causing America’s nobility to lose control of its serfs—and even, if only briefly, be in fear of them.”
Well, in this case it is good that the old fool did not get impeached, that at least made Nancy and the rest of the swamp mad.
https://www.naturalnews.com/2021-02-14-conservatives-realize-america-despise-white-people.html
“A new poll by AEI and YouGov has found that the vast majority of conservatives who support President Donald Trump are fully aware of the fact that White people are hated in the United States.
A whopping 87 percent of respondents agreed with the statement: “I worry that discrimination against Whites will increase a lot in the next few years.”
Conversely, 80 percent rejected the notion that “White people have an advantage in today’s America because of their skin color,” apparently recognizing that non-Whites are now actively discriminated against due to the color of their skin.
Conducted between Jan. 11-14, just before China Joe was installed into the White House, the poll offers a dire take on the state of American morale, particularly among conservatives who see the America they once knew and loved swirl down the toilet.
“Christianity is under attack in America today” is a statement that 89 percent of Trump supporters agree with, while nearly the same percentage agree that Christianity is an “essential part of American greatness.”
Consequently, America will fail if it loses its Christian heritage, which is now happening at breakneck speed.
More than three-quarters of Trump supporters feel stifled and unable to express their political views in public, even as people with other political views are free to express theirs.
Nearly all Trump supporters say that ethnic “minorities,” which are quickly becoming majorities, “have a mostly fair chance to succeed in today’s America.” Only about 30 percent believe that America is riddled with “systemic racism” – and they probably mean systemic racism against Whites.”
“Time’s Ball wrote: “In a way, Trump was right” about what she called a “shadow effort”:
There was a conspiracy unfolding behind the scenes, one that both curtailed the protests and coordinated the resistance from CEOs. Both surprises were the result of an informal alliance between left-wing activists and business titans. The pact was formalized in a terse, little-noticed joint statement of the U.S. Chamber of Commerce and AFL-CIO published on Election Day …
(It became) a well-funded cabal of powerful people, ranging across industries and ideologies, working together behind the scenes to influence perceptions, change rules and laws, steer media coverage and control the flow of information. They were not rigging the election; they were fortifying it.
That’s right, a “conspiracy” and “shadow effort” to “influence perceptions, change rules and laws, steer media coverage and control the flow of information.” In other words, a secret campaign to shut up Trump and his 74 million supporters and deny them their right to question the outcome of a hotly contested election. In the poisoned atmosphere that has ensued, anyone daring to voice concerns about the election’s possible fraud has been threatened or severely punished.
It’s a virtual institutional war against any and all Trump supporters.
As American Thinker founder Thomas Lifson noted last month before the Times’ revelations: “After four years of Democrats claiming Trump’s election was illegitimate based on a phony charge of Russian collusion, suddenly, questioning a presidential election is taboo.”
Lifson was onto something there. Dozens of conservatives have been deplatformed by social media for exercising their First Amendment rights to free speech in saying they thought the 2020 election was fraudulent and calling for a recount or audit of the results.
Americans spent four years during Trump’s term undergoing repeated investigations of the former president for alleged “collusion” with the Russians during the 2016 election – something that has been shown to be false. Yet, the source of this lie, Hillary Clinton, now runs free and has the chutzpah to call those senators who vote to acquit Trump his “co-conspirators.”
Some, such as renowned constitutional scholar John Eastman and Rep. Elise Stefanik, have lost jobs or advisory positions due to their pro-Trump comments. Meanwhile, 39 GOP House members have been threatened with censure or removal from the chamber for voting to overturn the election results, despite the 2020 election’s very clear irregularities.”
And what are the deplorables going to do now? Waiting for Trump to do something between rounds of golf and junk food. The saviour of the West … God help us! How can such a weak people fight against the monsters?
Comments