Rheumatologist Robert Jackson: 40 Percent of My 3,000 Vaccinated Patients Report a Significant Vaccine Injury By Chris Knight (Florida)
General practitioners (GPs) have been the real cowards during the Covid plandemic. Of course, with draconian medical boars, sorry, boards, breathing down their necks, we cannot expect much by way of advocating alternative treatments, but they have not stopped there. Big Pharma says jump, and they jump out of their skins, promoting the vax just like ….. sorry, I cannot think of any polite way of describing their behaviour. Worse than this, most are too scared to record vax injuries, according to various whistle-blower repots, especially those doctors in hospitals.
Nevertheless, a few doctors are speaking out on the vax injuries they are witnessing in clinical practice. For example, Dr Robert Jackson, has been a doctor for 35 years. In his practice there are over 5,000 patients, around 3,000 got vaccinated with the Covid vaccines, 40 percent reported a vaccine injury and five percent are still injured. His numbers were confirmed in the EULAR database and published in the BMJ: 37 percent had adverse events and 4.4 percent of patients had a flare up of their disease after vaccination. So, to my former GP who said that Covid vax injuries are as rare as getting hit by a truck, better start paying attention to what is parading in front of your very eyes, as there are a lot of trucks out there!
“People who claim VAERS is unreliable are wrong. We see evidence all the time from the direct observation of doctors who are paying attention of absurdly high rates of adverse events.
|
|
|
|
Robert Jackson has been a doctor for 35 years. In his practice there are over 5,000 patients, around 3,000 got vaccinated with the COVID vaccines.
What makes him unusual is that he is not afraid to speak out about what he is seeing in his patients. This is because he’s too valuable to fire. He’s never seen anything like this in his career.
The results are stunning: 40% reported a vaccine injury; 5% are still injured.
Nobody can argue his numbers are anecdotes because they were confirmed in the EULAR database and published in the BMJ: 37% had adverse events and 4.4% of patients had a flare up of their disease after vaccination.
Also, he’s had 12 deaths following the jab. Normally in his patient base he’ll see 1 or 2 deaths a year. So if there is a question of whether all-cause mortality goes up or down after the jabs rolled out, his numbers make it crystal clear. This is aggregated data over dozens of doctors: a .33% excess mortality rate among his patients after the vaccines rolled out (i.e., the vaccines likely killed 1 in 300 people in his patient base). However, this is likely an undercount because he’s not the primary care physician.
This suggests a kill rate many times higher than the .2% we estimated from VAERS. However, these are deaths in rheumatology patients, so this may account for the higher estimate. But we are in the same ballpark as the death estimate from VAERS.
Of course, there COULD be an “unknown” thing that killed all these people. It would have to be massive and injected into all these patients to cause the symptoms observed. Wonder what else fits that description? Nobody will tell us.
Naturally, the CDC doesn’t want you to know any of this and they would prefer it if you didn’t watch the video.
Also, he mentioned that about 5% develop a new condition that makes them susceptible to clotting. He notes that their observations about the increased rates of side effects have been confirmed in the literature.
Mesenchymal stem cell derived exosome treatment
Dr. Jackson also talked about remarkable results after treating COVID-19 patients using a 30 minute infusion of mesenchymal stem cell derived exosomes. This is available for use by anyone today. It can be used on both hospitalized patients and long-haulers.
Comments from AMD
There are 5 important points to consider with this video, some which may not be evident to people who do not work in this field.
#1 Doctors tend to be very bad at catching adverse reactions (I'm presently working on an article explaining some of the key reasons for this is). I believe the primary reasons why Dr. Jackson has such a high rate of adverse reactions in his practice is because he asks his patients what happened to them following vaccination; most doctors don't. As a result he "catches" reactions most doctors would not catch.
#2 Rheumatology patients are more susceptible to having reactions to the vaccine than the general population (for example pre-exacerbation of an existing autoimmune condition was a common side effect found in the recent Israeli study of individuals receiving the booster). However these patients were excluded from the initial vaccine trials (as people at risk of negative effects are rarely studied in clinical trials as the companies don't want to increase the adverse event rates). This is particularly insidious here because autoimmune patients are typically the #1 group recommended to get vaccinated (because they are "immune suppressed" and hence need the extra protection).
#3 As he is a consultant rather than their PCP, he is most likely going to miss or not hear about most of the deaths that occur. The only way he can sort of catch it is if he remembers a patient who was scheduled for followup doesn't show up for 6 months and then thinks to check if they are still alive...and at that point its difficult to figure out the temporal correlation with vaccination. If he was their PCP he'd see a much higher rate. [this is why he only sees a couple of deaths per year instead of 5 or more -stk]
#4 There is an extreme shortage/demand for rheumatologists in the midwest (hence why he goes to so many hospitals in a wide area). This gives him a lot of wiggleroom other doctors don't have since he does not have a central employer, and each of the 8 who subcontract to him cannot afford to loose him. Hence there is no corporate that can force him to vaccinate or censor his speech. Very few doctors are in this situation.
#5 Antiphospholipid syndrome is a common cause of blood clotting in patients with autoimmune disorders. This provides an alternative mechanism to explain why so many blood clots are occurring and hence why Dr. Jackson is so concerned with screening his patients for this disorder.
I have had a few patients with COVID that exosomes were tremendously helpful for, but since they are costly, I've only used them on extremely ill people who tried home treatment I expected to be hospitalized and then die. One of my colleagues has treated a larger number of very ill patients’ pre-hospitalization and had the same result, along with many post hospitalization who had long haul covid who had immediate recoveries. I've looked at a lot of therapies. I believe exosomes are the most helpful, but there are cheaper ones that often help a great deal, so I'm more conservative with the exosomes due to trying to be price conscious for my patients.
Summary
If the vaccines are safe and effective, this video is impossible to explain. A 1 in 300 death rate for a vaccine that doesn’t kill anyone? Someone is lying to you.”
https://rumble.com/v132f7g-rheumatologist-robert-jackson-40-vaccine-injured-0.33-dead.html
The entire plandemic has been a lie, from beginning to now.
Comments