Retreatism and Parallel Communities: Rebuilding White Communities, By Chris Knight (Florida)

The question has been asked: what if Kamala Harris wins and does all of the terrible things we have discussed? One answer, and it is something that can be adopted across the West, from Australia to the UK, is to build parallel communities for Whites, and Christians.

As society becomes increasingly hostile, here is a need to retreat and regroup. One attempt is described below, but that can be done at the local level. It is necessary, not only to oppose woke and protect people with alternative employment, but at last in America, to provide physical protection to people. I note that even in the quieter capital cities of Australia, there are reports of machete attacks by coloured gangs. This is common here too in "blue" US cities. At some point of social disintegration, one must be like Lot of the Bible and take one's family away from the source of evil. Let it implode under the weight of its own rottenness!

Time to rebuild anew.

https://www.amren.com/blog/2024/08/building-white-communities-2/

"America's formerly great cities are deteriorating. The suburbs — which have been redoubts against demographic transformation — are threatened. Anti-white propaganda is everywhere. Many traditionally minded whites therefore want to establish communities explicitly for the well-being and benefit of members of our race. Some see this as an alternative to conventional politics. If our mass experiment in multiculturalism is doomed, shouldn't we build new systems now, where and while we can? Many whites want to protect our people and ensure a safe future for our children regardless of what happens in Washington.

A recently established private-members association called Return to the Land (RTTL) builds legal and affordable communities for white families who want to leave public activism and political theorizing to others. We are not concerned about ideological purity or religious fundamentalism; we simply have built neighborhoods for our people — neighborhoods that comply with federal and state laws that have previously made this difficult.

Possible critiques

Some argue that moving to rural areas to found new settlements is "rural escapism." They say we should stay in cities, participate in politics, and fight from within the system. However, building white communities doesn't rule out activism or running for office.

Nor is rural life as isolating as it used to be; RTTL's founding community is down a dirt road in Arkansas, but members have high speed internet so they can work remotely. Moreover, the Fair Housing Act-compliant legal structure we've developed can apply to apartment buildings and any other urban real estate identitarian communities may own.

We have started in a safe rural area without building codes or zoning laws, where land is affordable and development is easy, because we want a way out for white families sooner rather than later. As our network grows, we plan to expand in whatever directions are best for our people.

Some critics argue that communities devolve into cults that attract marginal personalities and that we should instead integrate with local communities. There are hundreds of intentional communities around the US, and most don't become cults. RTTL has members of various religions, both European pagan and Christian. Some practice; some do not. We don't require community participation, so members can be as involved or uninvolved as they like, as long as they abide by the operating agreement of the LLC that owns the land. A version of that document is available here. It spells out land use regulations that are fairly hands-off.

RTTL gets calls every day from applicants who are well adjusted, ordinary people — though we do screen out some who might make others uncomfortable. More and more white Americans are looking for places where they can live according to their values, without being shamed for their heritage. In the past, people attracted to identitarian communities may have been marginal personalities, but things have changed.

Some critics of our efforts, citing the Waco siege, think the authorities will persecute communities like ours. This is unlikely. Trust in institutions was much higher 30 years ago, and the government could get away with things it could never do today. There were only a handful of media networks, so the authorities could easily push their version of events. Not so today. Everyone has a live-streaming device in his pocket, so we can hear all sides. We do not believe government would persecute a peaceful community just because it was white.

Legal framework

We protect our community through two layers of organization:

• Limited Liability Company (LLC): The LLC owns the land, and all residents must be shareholders. Shareholders have specific lots of land tied to their share in the LLC and have exclusive use of their own property. Improvements made to lots are reflected in the value of their shares, so members can invest securely in developing their property and are free to sell their shares at whatever asking price they choose.
• Private Membership Association (PMA): The PMA approves who can buy shares. This restricts ownership to vetted individuals.

LLC statutes allow for "share transfer restrictions," making transfers private and beyond the reach of federal housing laws. The PMA further restricts membership, ensuring a cohesive community. As a result, we're able to exercise our right to free association privately and securely. Moreover, our LLCs can hold property in a way that keeps members anonymous and free from harassment.

This framework is not theoretical. We have started building these communities and are expanding. Our flagship project in northern Arkansas is well underway, with residents living and working on the land. We invite you to contact us or attend one of our events. We build peaceful, secure communities for uncertain times.