Renaming Australia for the Woke By James Reed
The woke, who have been awoken by the death of the Queen, and must therefore do what they are expected to do, have proclaimed that Australia should be renamed because … oppression … racism … colonialism … you know the tune, hum along. The group is named “Blockade Australia.” Wait … if the name of Australia is changed to something like “Wokeustralia,” then is this something that the group, who had done the obligatory climate change blockades, will have to abandon, as they can’t then blockade their own creation, can they? As all the comfortable consumer stuff, like Leftist universities is part of the oppressive infrastructure, I guess these socialist folks are looking forward to hunting for their bush food in the scrub, having abandoned oppressive modernity. Good luck with that one.
“A radical climate activist group has called for Australia to be renamed following the death of Queen Elizabeth II.
Blockade Australia has demanded the change, arguing that the country's name represents a corrupt system designed to oppress and exploit.
The activist group is known for its anti-climate change protests, which included a blockade at the Sydney Harbour Tunnel that caused major traffic delays on June 27.
Now the group has made four blistering Facebook posts turning their attention to the name of the country following the death of The Queen on Thursday.
'Australia is not the name of this continent,' one read.
The second added: 'Australia doesn't refer to this land, these waters, or the many communities that call this place home'.
The climate group argued the name of the country was rooted in oppression.
'Australia is the name of the economic and political systems which work to oppress and exploit this continent and its peoples,' a third post read.
The final post read: 'These systems are complex, corrupt and have been designed to maximise extraction and maintain hierarchies of power.
'They have been in place since invasion'.
Invasion is the term used by activists to describe the arrival of the First Fleet at Sydney Cove in 1788.
The posts have sparked a mixed response from social media users, with some criticising the climate activist group.
'Blockade Australia is part of that system...hence the title of this group.... ironic that!!!' one wrote.
Another made a tongue-in-cheek dig at the group: 'You're so stunning, so brave Blockade Australia d-heads'.
Blockade Australia is not the only group using Her Majesty's death to push their own agendas, or make cheap jokes as her health failed in the last hours of her life.
The Australian Republican Movement, and its chairman Peter FitzSimons, waited just 17 minutes after her death was announced at 3.30am AEST.
After brief condolences, the organisation noted Her Majesty 'respected the self-determination of the Australian people' in a thinly veiled reference to the republic.
'The Queen backed the right of Australians to become a fully independent nation during the referendum on an Australian republic in 1999, saying that she has "always made it clear that the future of the Monarchy in Australia is an issue for the Australian people and them alone to decide, by democratic and constitutional means",' it said.
The statement was release even before Prime Minister Anthony Albanese issued his own, lengthy, one at 4.47am.
Despite his organisation alluding to the need for a republic, FitzSimons himself said now was not the time to start the conversation.
'For the moment, what happens now is keeping respectful silence,' he wrote on Twitter in response to a question from a republic supporter.
'Apart from quotes provided in case of her death, our only statement was the one acknowledging Her Majesty's contribution to Australia for over 70 years.
'There will be much to say, but now not time to say it.'
Greens leader Adam Bandt had no such tact, waiting just five hours to call for Australia to 'move forward' and become a republic.
The staunch republican, who refuses to put the Australian flag with its Union Jack corner behind him at press conferences, posted a brief tweet at 8.27am.
'Rest In Peace Queen Elizabeth II. Our thoughts are with her family and all who loved her,' he began - his entire condolence statement.
'Now Australia must move forward. We need Treaty with First Nations people, and we need to become a Republic.'
The Queen's death was announced about 3.30am and Australian morning TV shows announced the news an hour later, followed by a statement by Prime Minister Anthony Albanese at 4.47am.
Mr Bandt frequently calls for an Australian republic, believing the country needs its own head of state and the royals are too closely tied to colonialism.
His deputy, Senator Mehreen Faruqi, was even less respectful in her own tweet, and also took the opportunity to demand reparations for indigenous people.
'I cannot mourn the leader of a racist empire built on stolen lives, land and wealth of colonised peoples,' she wrote.
'We are reminded of the urgency of treaty with First Nations, justice and reparations for British colonies and becoming a republic.'
She said last year: 'The royals preside over an empire that has enslaved millions of black and brown people around the world. Their racism and colonialism continues.
'If we're truly interested in the tackling racism in our country, we need to break ties with the royals.'
Mr Bandt also backed up controversial indigenous Greens senator Lidia Thorpe who called The Queen a 'coloniser' when swearing her oath of office.
'I sovereign, Lidia Thorpe, do solemnly and sincerely swear that I will be faithful and I bear allegiance to the colonising Her Majesty Queen Elizabeth II,' she said.
Mr Albanese is also a republican and appointed a minister for the republic to eventually explore breaking Australia with the monarchy - but not the Commonwealth.
However, he made no mention of this aspiration in his statement or address to the nation, which had nothing but praise for The Queen.
In 1999, Australians narrowly voted against removing the queen, amid a row over whether her replacement would be chosen by members of parliament, not the public.
Polls show most Australians are in favour of being a republic, but there is little agreement on how a head of state should be chosen
Abbie Chatfield used The Queen's death as an excuse to remind her fans of Britain's colonial history, and said the idea of Charles becoming king made her physically ill.
Without even getting out of bed on Friday morning, she began by saying The Queen's death was 'obviously sad' for the Royal Family, but swiftly moved on to criticising colonialism and the monarchy.
'[It's] obviously sad that someone has died, sad for her family. The colonialism, not great; the monarchy, not my favourite thing in the world,' she said.
'He isn't very kind or competent. I don't really know, and I haven't good things about Charles.'
'Also, it isn't [the] 1700s. "The King"? Ew! Ew! Oh, my God. I knew this day was coming, but I don't like it. "King Charles..."' she added, retching as if about to vomit.
TV presenter Em Rusciano had a more nuanced take, pointing out what The Queen represented was complicated even if she as a person was beloved.
The comedian said people should be allowed to react to Her Majesty's death in their own way, contrasting her late grandmother Denise's love for The Queen with the pain indigenous people felt from colonialism.
'She represented so many conflicting and some unforgivable legacies. Today we must also consider our First Nations peoples and what this represents for them,' she said.
'Much will be debated today and moving forward around her family and what they’ve done throughout the years, and I imagine there will be some policing of people’s grief.
'On both sides, those who mourn her and those who mourn what her institution has done. To that I say, let everyone do it their way.'
Rusciano finished on a positive note by praising The Queen's more than 70 years of serve and the extraordinary example she set.
'The Queen was an extraordinary example of service, stoicism and endurance that we’re not likely to see again,' she said.
'She held on until the UK had a new PM and even met with Liz Truss the day of her death in Balmoral. She reigned so long she attained single name, icon diva status.'
In a similar vein, indigenous professor Sandy O'Sullivan at 7.36am described The Queen as the 'architect' of colonialism who built her wealth on 'pain and suffering'.
The Macquarie University professor of Indigenous Studies wrote that the late monarch failed to intervene to protect Aboriginal Australians from harm.
'For those saying we should be magnanimous about the passing of the queen, a reminder that the queen inserted herself into the lives of Indigenous people here multiple times,' they wrote.
'She wasn't a bystander to the effects of colonisation and colonialism, she was an architect of it.
'Demanding Indigenous people be respectful about the passing of someone who intentionally made our lives worse is outrageous. It's worth considering what she *could* have done - and didn't - to effect change.
'At so many times across the 20th Century, she could have intervened and reset the relationship between Indigenous people and "the crown", because she had more than ceremonial power to do so. She did nothing.'”
Comments