Questions about the Uvalde Mass Shooting By Chris Knight (Florida)
The web is now featuring numerous pieces raising some fundamental questions about the police response to the shooter in the Uvalde Texas affair. Even the mainstream media are reporting that the police held back and did not storm the building for, according to some reports, up to one hour. As well, parents who wanted to go into the building themselves were maced and handcuffed. It was admitted by the authorities that the police held back as they di not want to get shot! So much for the anti-gun rant that the police will save you! But, there is more I believe, Mike Adams doing his usual good work. What does not make sense is how the shooter, with no know employment was able to buy equipment that would cost up to $ 8,000. Where did the money come from to buy the expensive equipment?
“But before we start the timeline, we must first ask an extremely important question: How did an 18-year-old man, with no known employment, who was living with his grandmother because of an addicted mother, afford:
- Two expensive firearms made by Daniel Defense ($2,000 each)
- an EOTech optic ($400-$700)
- 1,657 rounds of .223 ammo ($800-1000 depending on how they were purchased)
- body armor ($500-1000)
- and over 60 magazines ($10-20 each)
For a total of approximately $6300 to $8,000? Most established adult Americans, especially after the last two years and the current economy, can’t afford a fraction of that. But this young 18-year-old was able to do so with no known job and all on a debit (not credit!) card? In a border town reportedly overrun by the worst of the worst from the US Border…I’ll let you make your own assumptions.”
https://www.naturalnews.com/2022-05-28-buffalo-shooter-groomed-fbi-commit-mass-murder.html
“The FBI’s fingerprints are all over the Buffalo mass shooting.
A local news report from the Buffalo News has linked a retired federal agent to the shooting because he apparently knew about it at least 30 minutes before it occurred.
The former agent, believed to be from Texas, is said to be under investigation for direct communications he had previously had with Payton Gendron, the alleged shooter. The former agent, along with at least six other individuals, engaged with Gendron in an online chat room “where racist hatred was discussed,” the Buffalo News reported.
Two law enforcement sources with direct knowledge of the investigation were supposedly petitioned by Gendron to read about his mass shooting plans (why do these alleged shooters always seem to have full-length manifestos outlining in detail their future crimes?).
It is unclear at this point whether or not the retired agent accepted the invitation. What we are being told is that law enforcement is once again involved, which points to this potentially being yet another government false flag attack with suspicious roots
“These were like-minded people who used this chat group to talk about their shared interests in racial hatred, replacement theory and hatred of anyone who is …, a person of color or not of European ancestry,” claimed one of the two law enforcement officials said to be privy to this background information.
“What is especially upsetting is that these six people received advanced notice of the Buffalo shooting, about 30 minutes before it happened. The FBI has verified that none of these people called law enforcement to warn them about the shooting. The FBI database shows no advance tips from anyone that this shooting was about to happen.”
Chances are that law enforcement is behind the Buffalo shooting
The FBI said it is now attempting to track down these six people, including the retired agent, to conduct interviews. Two sources “with close knowledge of the probe” told the Buffalo News that the FBI could charge them as accomplices depending on what gets uncovered.
The identity of the federal agency and which department he worked in remains unknown because the sources are not disclosing it. The FBI’s Buffalo office is also refusing to comment on the investigation.
“If he had advance notice, he had a moral obligation to get on the phone and try to notify someone about it,” said John V. Elmore, a Buffalo civil rights attorney representing the family of Andre Mackniel, one of the victims who died at the scene of the crime while buying a birthday cake for his three-year-old son.
Terrence M. Connors, another attorney who is representing several other victims’ families, echoed the sentiment that law enforcement knew the shooting was going to take place before it happened but did nothing to try to stop it.
“As outrageous as this may sound, based upon what we are finding in our investigation, it is not surprising,” Connors said.
Like most of the other mass shootings that have been blasted across the headlines and airwaves over the years, the Buffalo shooting is replete with questionable circumstances that point to a coverup at best. At worst, the shooter was groomed by the very people who are supposed to protect society into committing mass murder.
“Imagine how bad the situation is, with foreign spies operating full throttle in the U.S., at numbers unheard of, while the FBI is busy proving itself incompetent, and staging coups,” wrote someone at Natural News back in 2020 when the depth of FBI corruption really started gaining traction amid the election scandal.”
https://www.naturalnews.com/2022-05-27-federal-marshals-handcuffed-mom-trying-save-children.html
“A mother trying to save her two children at the Robb Elementary School shooting incident in Uvalde, Texas was handcuffed by federal marshals.
“The police were doing nothing. They were just standing outside the fence. They weren’t going in there or running anywhere,” said Angeli Rose Gomez, who drove 40 miles to the school to try to save her children as quickly as she can.
Gomez was one of the several parents demanding the officers to stop waiting around and go into the school themselves. It was then that the marshals approached her and put her in handcuffs,” the Wall Street Journal reported.
The enforcers informed her that she was being arrested for “intervening in an active investigation.” A few moment later, the mother was able to convince the authorities to free her – then she broke into a run; jumped a fence; and ran inside to rescue her kids.
Gomez shared that she also saw one father pepper-sprayed and another one tackled and thrown to the ground by the marshals as he tried to go to the school. The latter lost his 10-year-old daughter in the slaughter.
Social media posts showed footages of other parents calling for the law enforcement to do something and try to get into the school. The police had set up a perimeter around the building while the ordeal was taking place.
Witnesses of the horrific incident, mostly parents of the children, are outraged on the kind of response showed by the authorities.
A woman in one clip can be heard yelling, “Shoot him or something!”
A man can be heard saying, “They’re all just parked outside, dude. They need to go in there.”
“They say they rushed in,” said Javier Cazares, whose fourth-grade daughter, Jacklyn Cazares, was killed in the attack, and who raced to the school as the massacre unfolded. “We didn’t see that.”
Witness Juan Caranza, 24, told the media that he believes police officers should have done more to diffuse the situation, or at least try to do so. Instead, they just meandered about outside the school while the tragedy unfolded.
The shooter, identified as Salvador Ramos, had 40 minutes to one hour before the cops went in to neutralize him. This gave him ample time to massacre two teachers and the innocent lives of 19 children.
A young girl who survived the execution heard the shooter say, “What do I have here?” as he opened the classroom door and began firing.
Ramos was eventually shot and killed by a border patrol agent who also sustained injuries.
Murderer entered the school unobstructed
The gunman entered the building unobstructed, contrary to the information released earlier, authorities said on May 26.
“Ramos was not confronted by a school police officer before he entered the elementary school,” said Victor Escalon, the South Texas regional director for the state Department of Public Safety.
The Texas ranger said no armed guard challenged the teenaged attacker and it is unclear if the school door was even locked. Reports quoted witnesses saying police were hesitant to confront the killer.
Campuses are required to have staff who patrol door entrances, parking lots and perimeters according to Uvalde County Independent School District Officers protocol.
“We will find out as much as we can why it was unlocked,” Escalon said. “Or maybe it was locked. But right now, it appears it was unlocked.”
Meanwhile, an armed school officer was driving nearby but was not on campus before the shooting spree started, said a law enforcement official who was not authorized to discuss the case and spoke on the condition of anonymity.
The said enforcer told NBC: “Investigators concluded that school officer was not positioned between the school and the shooter, leaving him unable to confront the shooter before he entered the building.”
https://www.naturalnews.com/2022-05-29-cops-saved-own-kids-tackled-sprayed-parents.html
“MSN is reporting that police officers in Uvalde, Texas, quietly rescued their own children from Robb Elementary School before way-later dealing with the shooter on behalf of other people’s children.
Law enforcement officers who were at the scene are receiving backlash for doing nothing while barricading parents outside the school and preventing them from entering in order to save their children. Meanwhile, some of these same officers allegedly slipped in before that to rescue their own.
Keep in mind that some angry parents were pepper-sprayed and even tackled by these same police for trying to enter the school without permission in order to get their children out of there.
One police officer told the media that he did, in fact, enter Robb Elementary School beforehand in order to save his children. He added that he was joined by several other officers who did the same “because it was an active shooter situation.”
“It’s a terrible situation right now and just as we mentioned the loss of life,” the officer added in an attempt to justify these actions. “It’s a terrible, terrible tragedy that took place.”
Did Uvalde police really wait until a key arrived in order to neutralize the shooter?
It is a terrible, terrible tragedy that may not have been so tragic had police officers done something to try to stop it. Instead, they stood outside like guards and blocked parents from getting to their children who were locked inside.
Witnesses offered accounts of conflicting information they were given from different officers about why they were idly moseying about instead of doing their jobs. One of them said he needed help unlocking a door, even though the shooter had already entered through that same door.
Some officers claimed that there were already officers “going in to get kids,” while others seemed to be oblivious to the situation.
“There was not sufficient manpower at that time, and their primary focus was to preserve any further loss of life,” argued Lt. Chris Olivarez in defense of the officers’ behavior.
“They started breaking windows around the school and trying to rescue, evacuate children and teachers while that was going on.”
It took about an hour before police eventually forced themselves inside the classroom where the shooter was said to be hiding out. Like with many other shootings, they reportedly killed the shooter immediately.
In the comment section at Natural News, someone wrote that this latest shooting was clearly “staged” to “lock the shooter in to let him do maximum damage.”
“Those in power own the media. They can do whatever they want and the truth will never get reported,” wrote another. “This was likely another psy-op by a traitorous government. They can’t go full authoritarian until they have taken our guns.”
Another wrote that this entire thing “sounds just like Sandy Hook, a false flag.”
“The Uvalde CISD Police Department hosted an ‘Active Shooter Course’ at the school to take place March 21, 2022 from 8-5,” responded another with unconfirmed information. “The whole ‘shooting’ was staged two months ago. It was a drill later sold as the real thing.”
Someone else questioned whether or not all of the “police officers” on site were even the real thing, “or were they just extras?”
“I would think the police would break down the door instead of waiting for a key,” said another. “They didn’t go in until the key arrived. The door is apparently more valuable than human lives.”
“The country is falling apart and being destroyed as we watch,” wrote someone else.”
Once more, the entire shooting event is highly suspicious and is most likely something which was allowed to happen to aid the Democrat’s push to eliminate the Second Amendment, as has been called for after the previous shooting in Buffalo.
Comments