Protection from the Afghan Migrants? Even Macron Sees What is Coming By Richard Miller (London)
You know that things are bad when globalist, immigration-mad French PM Macron says that there needs to be protection from the latest tidal wave of migrants, erupting as an aftermath of disastrous failed wars for the global elites.
“Macron Says Europe Must ‘Protect Itself’ From Wave of Afghan Migrants
Joanna York, The Connexion, August 17, 2021
President Emmanuel Macron said in a speech last night (August 16) that Europe must “protect itself from significant waves of illegal migrants” from Afghanistan, following the Taliban seizing power in the country.
Mr Macron said: “France will continue to fulfil its duty to protect those who are in the most danger. We will play our part in an organised and fair international effort.
“[But] Europe cannot take on the consequences from the current situation alone.”
He said illegal migration was “dangerous” for people who travelled to Europe and “contributed to trafficking of all kinds”.
Comments criticised online
The president’s comments were swiftly criticised by other politicians on social media, as the Twitter hashtag #EmmanuelLePen compared him to far-right politician and leader of Le Rassemblement National, Marine Le Pen.
Deputy mayor of Paris, Audrey Pulvar, said the president’s comments were similar to former President Nicolas Sarkozy comparing migrants from Syria entering Europe to a “water leak”.
“The political right is still the political right,” she said.
National Secretary for Europe Ecologie Les Verts, Julien Bayou, tweeted: “What about asylum? And the children, women and men who are fleeing terror?”
“France must play its part. We need a concrete plan.”
Michelle Malkin, American Renaissance, has a better take on this. Time to end this globalist madness of endless wars and endless refugees:
https://www.amren.com/commentary/2021/08/endless-wars-endless-refugees/
“It’s time to end the madness. However you feel about President Joe Biden’s handling of the withdrawal of troops from Afghanistan, I want you to focus on what’s best for Americans on American soil right here. Right now.
Our citizens are suffering under continued draconian lockdowns, medical tyranny, skyrocketing inflation, violent crime, cancerous homelessness, border chaos, ideological persecution and Silicon Valley censorship.
Cops cannot or will not maintain law and order.
Gun owners who exercise their right to self-defense face scorn at best and decades in prison at worst.
Our troops are being emasculated and mass-vaccinated against their will.
The mental health crisis among veterans and teens is unceasing.
Health care workers have become shills and guinea pigs for Big Pharma.
Schools regulate how much air your children can breathe, whether they are allowed to have water breaks or sing in public, and how much guilt they must confess in the classroom for the sin of being white or part-white.
Our criminal justice system is run by corruptocrats and hijacked by mob rule.
Election integrity is a joke, and those who expose it are punished.
This country has transmogrified before our eyes into an incorrigible Clown World. The very last thing we need right now is to compound the chaos with the addition of 30,000 Afghan refugees imported through the Special Immigrant Visas program run by the notoriously open-borders, “America Last” U.S. State Department. According to documents obtained by Fox News over the weekend, the bureaucracy “plans to potentially relocate up to 30,000 Afghan SIV applicants into the United States in the immediate future” and resettle them at military bases such as Fort McCoy in Wisconsin and Fort Bliss in Texas “while still being vetted for parolee status.”
“We want to have the capacity to get up to several thousand immediately and want to be prepared for the potential of tens of thousands,” Pentagon spokesperson John Kirby told Fox News. “Bliss and McCoy have the capability right now — and what’s advantageous is with a little bit of work, they could increase their capacity in very short order. … We’re going to focus on getting as many folks out as we can.”
Whoa, whoa, whoa, Nelly. When do ordinary Americans, whose neighborhoods will be flooded with all these untold numbers of “folks,” get a say about this “import first, ask questions later” refugee dump? Who voted for 6,000 of our best and bravest American soldiers to be used as travel agents and security guards for unlimited numbers of poor, unskilled and unvetted Afghans and their families who will soak up precious public resources in our age of pandemania?
Bleeding-heart Democrats and Biden-bashing Republicans are both tripping over themselves to virtue signal over the sight of desperate Afghans clamoring into helicopters and planes to get out of their Godforsaken mess of a country. I understand the impulse to exploit the withdrawal fiasco for political gain. But pull yourselves together and think, people. Think.
The Special Immigrant Visas, or SIV, program was originally created to help a small number of Afghan and Iraqi interpreters who worked for the U.S military. By 2018, the U.S. Government Accountability Office reported that a whopping 60,000-plus individuals — about 20,000 principal SIV holders and their families — had been admitted to America under SIVs and received federal resettlement assistance upon arrival. The number of SIV visas has grown steadily over the past decade as the number of troops in the Middle East has shrunk. In 2017, 26,000 troops were stationed in Afghanistan and Iraq; that year, 18,000-plus SIV applications from Afghans and Iraqis were approved.
Do the math. This isn’t compassion. It’s a con game.
At what cost? In July, Open Borders Inc. advocates helped push through $1 billion in new funding for the Afghan SIV program. The cash benefits flow immediately — including resettlement grants, cash, medical assistance, social services, employment services, food stamps, case management services and welfare that can last up to five years. Despite all that, the feds found that 60% of SIV holders were unemployed 90 days after arrival.
Meanwhile, Afghan SIV holders in Northern Virginia — where the numbers have increased more than tenfold since fiscal year 2013 and almost doubled from fiscal years 2015 through 2016, according to the Government Accountability Office — were straining schools, hospitals and affordable housing before COVID-19 chaos. Imagine what the impact will be now — and don’t be naive about the demographic and electoral consequences of recklessly throwing open the gates to these masses, let alone the public safety and national security implications of allowing untold numbers of refujihadis to blend in with the refugee population, which I’ve reported on extensively in my books and columns.
How do we prevent the refugee resettlement racket from pressuring American politicians to keep importing endless numbers of people from countries that hate our guts? Twenty years of reflection upon the invasions of Afghanistan and Iraq should make it clear to all who truly put America first: Mind our own business first; put our country and its people first; and stop exporting American soldiers to wage endless and hopeless wars in countries that hate our guts.”
It is the living face of the Great Replacement.
The Great Replacement; Don’t Notice it, Until it is Too Late!
By Chris Knight (Florida)
James Kirkpatrick at Vdare.com, has given a great commentary on the excitement generated in the new class elites by the news that the number of whites in America has declined for the first time ever. The point made is that this is a Great Replacement by definition, but the elites are concerned that if whites get to know about it, they might do something about it before it is too late.
“The recent news that the number of whites in the United States has declined for the first time in American history produced curious doublethink among Regime journos. Some of the cruder commentators, like Affirmative Action columnist Charles Blow ex-neocon Jennifer Rubin simply celebrated it. But there were numerous other articles warning about the correct way to report this news. The unspoken premise: if whites learn that they are in fact being replaced and that it is being done on purpose, they might do something about it. And if whites do something about it, the failed experiment that is the U.S. might come to an end.
Consider the following articles from mainstream sources:
- The Memo: Fall in white population could add fuel to nativist fire by Niall Stanage, The Hill, August 14, 2021
- White fear is the wrong way to tell the Census story, by Peniel E. Joseph, CNN, August 16, 2021
- Multiracial population grew in almost every county in the US. It doesn’t mean racism is over. By Nicole Chavez, CNN, August 15, 2021
Remember, the party line was The Great Replacement wasn’t actually happening. To Notice that it was, in fact, happening was borderline terrorism.
However, much like with the crime statistics gathered by the federal government, the data speak for themselves [The Color of Crime, New Century Foundation, 2016].
It is no longer possible to cover it up. And progressive activists are finding it hard to restrain themselves from boasting that the whole point is to make Americans’ lives worse. Simple repression only goes so far. The federal government is crawling away in disgrace from a humiliating exit from Afghanistan, but I doubt it will teach the Swamp a lesson in humility.
You might think the Regime would at least try to come up with a concrete reason why a white minority America is actually a good thing, hoping we forget about the mass riots that were taking place in formerly First World South Africa just a few weeks ago. Yet they are not even trying. In fact, some simply assert that alerting whites to their dispossession will provoke terrorism.
To quote from the stories above:
- The Hill’s Stanage after quoting Heidi Beirich (formerly of the SPLC, now with a new grift called the “Global Project Against Hate and Extremism”) and talking about “hate crimes,” concludes: [T]he latest census figures will likely sharpen the forces of white grievance politics. That’s an ominous development in an already-troubled country.”
- CNN’s Joseph tries to tell us that something is both happening and not happening at once. He says:
Journalists report on facts, so it's understandable that they would identify a large drop in the White population, reflected in data, as significant. Objectively speaking, it is. Yet the trap of seeing the drop in White population as the only, or even the main, story of the Census data reinforces our own insistence on seeing these transformations through a cynical lens. Pitting White America against hordes of threatening ‘colored’ people is part of a long, complex, and fraught history—one wherein changing definitions of “Whiteness” both expanded and restricted the boundaries of citizenship
Huh?
- CNN’s Chavez flimflams just as frantically:
“Even if the White individuals in our country are decreasing numerically, it doesn’t necessarily suggest that they’re losing any of their power. These power structures are built into our systems, historically and will still be built pretty strongly going forward,” [mixed race woman Sarah] Gaither said.
Of course, the real “power structures” benefit those who don’t identify as white. Hispanics who identify as white dropped by 53% in the last 10 years. Middle Easterners (technically still classified as white) are desperate to have their racial categorization changed. And of course, mixed-race people themselves identify with their non-white half because that’s where the money and political power is.
If the “power structures” benefitted whites, people would not be so eager to flee from being called white. If the “power structures” were even race-neutral, this unprecedented demographic transformation would not be happening.
Furthermore, if simply providing information leads to violence or radicalism, the Regime Media, which enjoys a far bigger platform than we could dream of, should look in the mirror. It has incited hatred against whites for months. Now, some journalists are trying to hide the consequences of their provocation.
There’s been a heavy death toll against Americans of all colors. There’s been particular savagery unleashed against whites. However, blacks have also suffered.
The question is not whether “Black Lives Matter.” The question is how many black lives the NGO heads, huckster preachers, “community leaders,” and virtue-signaling liberal white women are willing to sacrifice in order to hurt ordinary people and take down some statues.
The answer seems to be: all of them. This makes Regime attempts to link patriots to “terrorism” particularly contemptible: so many journalists and NGO activists in this country have blood on their hands. The fact that they make these kinds of arguments to try to prevent debate on immigration shows utter shamelessness and sociopathy.
However, there is a grain of truth to what critics are saying, and this may underlie the real fear that Regime journalists have. They are worried people might Notice The Great Replacement while they still have time to do something about it.
Even though the white share of the electorate declined in every state before the 2020 election, whites remain the majority and will remain the majority of the electorate for some time [The Changing Racial and Ethnic Composition of the U.S. Electorate, by Ruth Igielnick and Abby Budiman, Pew Research, September 23, 2020]. This even includes California, where the white vote could account for as much as two-thirds of the upcoming recall vote on California Governor Gavin Newsom [Newsom holds only slim margin in recall vote, Berkeley IGS Poll finds, by Edward Lempinen, Berkeley News, July 27, 2021].
In other words, white voters, and Americans of all races who don’t want the country to turn into South Africa, could stop this deliberate drive for demographic transformation. It would not require radical measures. It could be done at the ballot box—and with the Biden Administration’s foreign policy fiascos, soaring inflation, and an unpopular border rush, an opportunity might come earlier than expected [Harvard/Harris Poll Shows Disapproval of Biden Immigration Policies, by Andrew Arthur, Center for Immigration Studies, June 29, 2021].
Enacting the immigration platform President Trump ran and won on in 2016 would be a beginning.
This isn’t the same as saving the country. That would require at least doing what Trump didn’t even broach. It means abolishing racial discrimination in law, i.e. Affirmative Action. It would mean reversing Critical Race Theory and other forms of anti-white indoctrination. It would mean an immigration moratorium, with perhaps a partial exception for authentic refugees suffering from political repression and who have something to contribute (like, say, the Afrikaners). However, while it isn’t sufficient, stopping immigration cold is at least necessary.
Yet who will propose such a policy? Former President Trump, presumably to embarrass Joe Biden, wants to bring in more Afghan “refugees.” Other Republican governors support this position. The Republican Party, if anything, is in danger of doubling down on the neoconservative Invade-The-World, Invite-The-World policies of the George W. Bush years.
If there’s a leader of the populist right with a sizable platform who could conceivably advance any productive program, it’s television host Tucker Carlson on Fox News—and that’s hardly the same thing as having a mass political base.
Still, the Left seems seized by paranoia. It’s like they are in a kind of race between America’s awakening patriotic consciousness and the possibly irreversible demographic transformation of the electorate. It’s as if they know they removed the mask too early with their repressive measures and overt anti-white rhetoric.
The Left’s solution: to swamp the Historic American Nation as soon as possible. Barring GOP opposition, such a program may well succeed. While President Biden is hardly covering himself in glory, the Republicans aren’t presenting any real alternative.
Ultimately, all of this is really about what defines a nation. In theory, the military went to war after 9/11 to defend America after a terrorist attack. Now, we find out that it is our duty to invite every Afghan who wants to come to the United States, displace those who disproportionately fought the war, and wage a war on “terrorism” at home because some people have convinced themselves that the Mostly Peaceful Protest on January 6 was worse than the World Trade Center and Pentagon attacks in 2001 [MSNBC: Jan. 6 was worse than 9/11, by Becket Adams, Washington Examiner, July 7, 2021].
What, exactly, is the military supposed to be defending? What, precisely, defines a nation that celebrates as its highest aspiration the dispossession of its core population?
If what’s happening now isn’t treason, it’s only because there is no longer any nation left to betray.”
The social breakdown itself is going to generate the chaos that ends the migration madness, for when the US collapses, who would want to come here anyway, since migrants come only for selfish advancement of their own interests naturally enough, not to somehow improve the common wealth.
Comments