#PlasmidGate and the Contaminated Vaccines By Brian Simpson

While perhaps most people outside of academia and health professions may have forgotten about Covid, the legacy carries on. My neighbour’s daughter has done psychology, and she took a break before doing clinical studies during the Covid mandates here in Victoria. Now she is trying to get into a university which does not have vaccine mandates, and given her course is classified under health care, she can’t find a way in, being a pure blood unvaxxed. So, she may have to start over again in some other course, like law, with more HECS debt, or try and get some work, she knows not what. So, the vax is relevant to people’s lives and still oppressing them. This is, after all, a culture where the vaccine is the new religion of the technocratic dystopia state.

The other reason why the Covid vax is relevant is that the ill health and adverse effects from it are unfolding still. I have been covering the issue of the contamination of the Covid mRNA vaxxes, the last post being a summary of Dr Mercola’s excellent take. Here is another less complicated view of what is now viral, pun intended, on the net, of #PlasmidGate. In a nutshell, the Covid mRNA vaxxes have been experimentally shown to have significant quantities of plasmid DNA, which does not breakdown in the body. In principle it can integrate into the DNA of the cells. This DNA should not have been in the vax at all, and is a genetic contaminant. The full extent of the dangers that this may pose to human health have not yet been fully examined, but it could be playing a part in the epidemic of turbo-charged cancers that seem to be disproportionately hitting the young. That was the view of Dr Mercola in a previous post, but there are possible reproduction ramifications as well. It is too soon to know yet.

https://arkmedic.substack.com/p/5-ways-to-skin-a-genetically-modifiedl

“By now I sincerely hope that you have all been watching the exposure of the #PlasmidGate scandal unfold on twitter and various other platforms. If you haven’t I’m going to summarise it for you as briefly I can:

When Pfizer and Moderna said that they produced an “RNA vaccine” and that an “RNA vaccine” meant that anything they injected into you would have a short lived (days) effect at most, it was a lie.

When the media, the regulators and the government said it “isn’t gene therapy” without knowing what was actually in the product, that was also a lie.

The primary reason that this is now proven to be a lie is that multiple laboratories around the world have proven that those COVID vaccines contain therapeutic levels of plasmid DNA. DNA lasts for ever and if it integrates into your genome, you will produce its product forever. There is no definition of gene therapy anywhere in the world that this process would be excluded from.

This is #PLASMIDGATE

For more details on #Plasmidgate outside of twitter I would refer you to the original substack from Kevin McKernan here and the whole testimony of Dr Phillip Buckhaults here.

Just for background, it’s important to know what plasmid DNA is - it’s the lab-based circular DNA particles that is replicated in big vats of poo and then used to create the mRNA that goes into your “short lived” vaccine.

It’s a lab tool so should never be in a drug injected into a human. It’s not allowed to be there. It’s like having a drug that requires arsenic as a substrate to make it, and then throwing the leftover arsenic into the actual drug that gets injected into you.

But this article is not directly about the discovery of Plasmid DNA in the Pfizer and Moderna jabs (that has been now verified by 6 labs worldwide).

It’s about the special properties of the contents of that DNA and the RNA that is made from it, combined with the RNA that accompanies it (the jabs have the stated RNA in them as well as the stowaway DNA).

You see, it turns out that there are at least 5 different mechanisms for that DNA-RNA-protein combination to take that DNA into the nucleus of your cells. And that wasn’t on the advertising brochure was it?

Don’t believe me? See what Dr Phillip Buckhaults has to say about the Buckshot. I have clipped out the most important part from his speech to the SC Senate hearing and the most important bit of the most important bit is this:

“During the process they chopped them [the DNA plasmids] up to try to make them go away but they actually increased the hazard of genome modification”