Pfizer and the Voice By James Reed

I am not surprised. Pfizer, those kind folks who gave us the life-saving vaxxes, now want us to vote YES in the Voice referendum. This goes with the packaging of Big Pharma as saving the world, so naturally, they say: “We believe the Voice will enable better health outcomes for First Nations communities in Australia and provide a route to help inform policy decisions that impact their lives.

Reconciliation helps to address the most significant disparity in Australia’s population: the health and wellbeing of First Nations peoples.

How this actually works is as much as mystery as the mRNA spike proteins. It would seem logical that health inequalities, if they exist, and that is an act of faith of the Left, should still be addressed, referendum or no referendum. Thus, if a NO vote succeeds, people should not wring their hands in white racial guilt, but still work to dealing with everything that supposedly would have been done (but won’t be) if the New World Order referendum had succeeded.

In the meantime, Pfizer is another reason to vote: NO!

https://blog.rebekahbarnett.com.au/p/red-flag-pfizer-advocates-for-constitutional

“Pfizer has weighed in on an upcoming referendum in which Australians will vote on whether to change their constitution.

Australians will be asked to vote YES or NO to the following question:

"A Proposed Law: to alter the Constitution to recognise the First Peoples of Australia by establishing an Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Voice. Do you approve this proposed alteration?"

If the YES vote wins, the Australian constitution will be altered to formally recognise the First Nations Peoples, and an Indigenous advisory body will be established to speak to the Parliament on behalf of Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islanders. This would be equivalent to the US constitution being amended to formally recognise the First Peoples status of Native Americans, with a separate advisory body being established to represent this group to Congress.

Debate is heating up Down Under, with Indigenous and political leaders taking strong positions for YES or NO. The Australian Government is campaigning for YES, with the Opposition taking the NO side.

Yesterday, Pfizer Australia - a global pharmaceutical company - pledged its support for the YES vote.

“Pfizer Australia supports the Voice to Parliament, underpinned by constitutional recognition of Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander people as the First People of Australia.

We believe the Voice will enable better health outcomes for First Nations communities in Australia and provide a route to help inform policy decisions that impact their lives.

Reconciliation helps to address the most significant disparity in Australia’s population: the health and wellbeing of First Nations peoples.

We respect the conversations around the Voice and encourage people to engage in genuine learning about the past, to ensure Australia has a well-informed referendum about the proposed constitutional change.”

Please appreciate the cultural appropriation of Australian Indigenous art inset with Pfizer’s signature double helix logo, accompanying the announcement on Pfizer Australia’s Instagram page. A follower asked, where are the red lines to represent the blood clots? It appears they have been omitted from the final design.

Diversity, Equity & Inclusion

Since Pfizer’s rebrand as a quasi-humanitarian organisation during the Covid pandemic (saving the world, one jab at a time!), the company has repositioned itself as an ‘ally’ of marginalised minority groups through their Reconciliation Action Plan (RAP) and Diversity, Equity & Inclusion (DE&I) initiatives.

Pfizer’s new pledge to support the Voice is the result of continued engagement with its suitably diverse RAP advisory board of elders and advisors. One of these advisors is Uncle Michael West, a member of the Stolen Generations and Aboriginal man of the Gamilaroi Nation.

West says,

“Pfizer has demonstrated its commitment to education by listening to our stories and lived experiences. These learnings are key to understanding the social determinants of health, housing, education and employment and their symbiotic nature and the inequalities faced by Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander People.”

The Pfizer vaccine-injured can only dream of the pharmaceutical giant listening with such commitment to their lived experiences.

Woke-Face

Pfizer is one of the most fraudulent, corrupt organisations on the face of the planet. Kanakoa the Great documented their astonishingly bad rap sheet in 2021, and Josh Guetzow has summarised Pfizer’s Covid vaccine trial fraud more recently. So why the Woke-Face?

All roads lead to ESG

Environmental, Social & Governance (ESG) frameworks require performative Woke-Face for maintenance of a high ESG score, the corporate version of social credit. It’s back-door totalitarianism,

¹

 imposed by unelected advisory groups, using a coercive corporate regulatory framework to recruit corporations to act as the shock troops for the UN / globalist Sustainable Development Goals (SDG - these globalists love their acronyms).

Companies that don’t play ball on ESG are squeezed out of capital markets, and targeted with regulatory lawfare.

As in totalitarian socialist regimes of times past, everything is politics. You can’t have a beer, buy groceries, watch sports, or be rescued from a fire without being saturated in the regime propaganda, and subjected to performative displays of deference.”