Paul Craig Roberts on the Trump Assassination Attempt, By Chris Knight (Florida)
Leading political commentator, Paul Craig Roberts, predictably enough, rejects the mainstream view of the Trump assassination attempt that there was only one shooter, Crooks. The analysis of the acoustic evidence done by Mike Adams, led him to conclude that the first three shots came from Crooks, but that there was a shot from inside the building. The problem here is that would not be shown by acoustic evidence, as the distance was the same. However, while Roberts is right on this point, Adams has posted a more recent post where there is a link to a video which as recorded, showing a rifle being fired from the first-floor building where Crooks was. This means, if this is authentic, there was yet another shooter, who was aiming at Trump.
It was thus like a shooting gallery and perhaps it really was the will of the Lord that Trump only got a grazing shot to the ear!
https://www.paulcraigroberts.org/2024/07/22/my-take-on-the-assassination-attempt/
"Based on the acoustic analysis presented by Mike Adams and Chris Martenson ( https://www.paulcraigroberts.org/2024/07/21/acoustic-evidence-proves-beyond-all-doubt-more-than-one-shooter/ ), here is my interpretation of the attempted assassination of Donald Trump.
Adams concluded that the first three shots came from Crooks on the building roof. However, Adams later says he thinks shots afterward came from inside the building on which Crooks was perched. Adams concludes that the first three shots came from Crooks, because the calculated distance coincides with Crooks' location. But shooters from inside the building would be at the same distance from Trump as Crooks.
Martenson provides evidence that the first three shots did not come from Crooks. He points out that the trajectory of the bullets was upward, not downward. Therefore, they could not have been fired from on top of the building.
Keep this in mind and remember the surprised reaction of the two police snipers who had been observing Crooks for 20 minutes prior to the shooting. When the first shots were fired, they jumped up and quickly repositioned their scopes. This suggests that they were surprised that the first shots did not come from Crooks but from a source they were not observing. It would be interesting to hear their explanation of their surprised reaction.
The value of the ballistic analysis is that it establishes conclusively that there was more than one shooter. But the upward trajectory of the bullets and the apparent police surprise that the initial shots did not come from the expected source indicate that more thought is required as to where the first shots originated.
As what clearly is a deep state assassination attempt will be covered up, it leaves Trump exposed to another attempt."
https://www.paulcraigroberts.org/2024/07/28/where-matters-stand/
A user on X (@realDJstew724) has posted a video that he says he recorded himself at the Trump shooting, capturing what appears to be the firing of a suppressed rifle from inside a first floor window of the very same building on which Crooks was crawling (on the roof).
Although further confirmations are needed -- and this user says he will post his raw video within a day or so -- unless this is some sort of elaborate hoax requiring very technical audio and video alterations, this video appears to have captured a new shooter that has previously not been known to exist.
Importantly, this apparent shot took place just over 9 seconds after the first round was fired, meaning it would be round #10, making the counter-sniper shot from U.S. Secret Service round #11, at approximately 16 seconds after the first round was fired.
The following two images capture what appear to be muzzle blast from a rifle fired from inside a room of the first floor of the building.
An audio signature accompanies this muzzle flash, coming across as the firing of a suppressed rifle.
You can watch the full video of the slow-motion version here, posted on Brighteon, but this video is somewhat pixelated due to the rendering at a lower bitrate:
Brighteon.com/87dc0827-7502-4e3b-841a-5331d5eae12b
And you can download the full video directly from my Telegram post at this link.
CONCLUSIONS: The source of this video needs to be vetted. We have reached out to the user who posted it, and we are requesting original, raw video for further analysis. If this video is a hoax, it would represent a very difficult hoax to carry out, requiring strong technical skills in audio and video editing. If it is authentic, it completely changes the line of questioning (and timeline of events) surrounding this attempted assassination of Donald J. Trump.
If this video is authentic, then there is another shooter who clearly wasn't aiming for Crooks."
Comments