Once Upon a Time, in Australia, Face Masks Were Held Not to be Safeguards Against Viruses By Mrs Vera West
This is very interesting and shows the great inconsistency in the Covid narrative. Face masks became something of a religious relic of the Covid cult, and today one can still see people religiously wearing them all day. Go to see a GP and you will probably need to wear one. Yet, back in 2003, the mainstream press published warnings from the government that those claiming that face masks protected against viruses faced fines. One such article, referenced below, appeared in The Age, and stated that medical authorities believed that those pretty blue masks were only good for about 20 minutes, after which, moisture from breathing allows the bugs to roll on through. So, what changed over the time since then and Covid? Clearly nothing. In fact, as I have reported over coverage of the plandemic, the evidence shows that masks are ineffective at stopping the virus. It was all about social control.
“Australians who tried to sell surgical face masks on the back of claims they worked against viruses were once threatened with prosecution and massive fines by the government.
An article titled ‘Farce mask: it’s safe for only 20 minutes’ published by the Sydney Morning Herald in 2003 explained how, “Retailers who cash in on community fears about SARS by exaggerating the health benefits of surgical masks could face fines of up to $110,000.”
The article quotes a public health experts who said that face masks are largely useless at stopping the spread of viruses and could even worsen the situation.
“Those masks are only effective so long as they are dry,” said Professor Yvonne Cossart of the Department of Infectious Diseases at the University of Sydney.
“As soon as they become saturated with the moisture in your breath they stop doing their job and pass on the droplets.”
Professor Cossart said that the masks would need to be changed every 15-20 minutes to be in any way effective.
Her sentiments were echoed by John Bell from the Pharmaceutical Society of Australia, who said that masks only offered “marginal benefit” and were largely psychological in their level of protection.
The story is noteworthy because during the COVID pandemic, the Australian government imposed one of the strictest lockdowns in the world and used face mask mandates as a brutal tool of population control.
As we previously highlighted, authorities in Melbourne used high-tech surveillance drones to catch people outside not wearing masks.
At the height of the hysteria, there were numerous instances of police in Australia physically attacking people for not adhering to mask wearing rules, including one incident when a woman was placed in a chokehold by a male police officer.
Another video showed an elderly woman being arrested for not wearing a mask while sitting on a park bench.
Yet another clip showed police pepper spraying pre-teen children for not wearing face masks.
Another clip showed an elderly man suffering a suspected heart attack after he was arrested by police for not wearing a mask outside while exercising.
During the early months of the COVID pandemic, health authorities advised against wearing masks, only to subsequently do a 180 once face coverings became a convenient psychological tool of population control.