Now Dictionaries Will Define Whites as Racist! By Chris Knight

     Our enemies are beyond reason; they must be politically fought, and defeated, or they will utterly destroy Western civilisation. Whites are already being defined as the only possible racists, even though this is illogical and conceptually absurd.
  https://www.naturalnews.com/2020-07-01-merriam-webster-change-definition-racism-only-white-people.html

“According to far-leftists, the only people who are capable of “racism” are those with lighter skin. And a recent college graduate from Drake University in Iowa has successfully petitioned Merriam-Webster Dictionary to redefine the word as such. Kennedy Mitchum, a 22-year-old black woman, says that racism is a phenomenon exclusive to “white” people. She majored in “law, politics and society,” after all, so she would know, she claims. Black people are always and only victims of racism, while white people are always and only perpetrators of it. It is really this black and white, according to Mitchum, who became triggered upon the realization that the Merriam-Webster Dictionary seems to imply that anyone can be racist. “With everything going on, I think it’s really important that everyone is on the same page,” Mitchum told a local news station in her home state of Missouri about the “systemic racism” that she believes undergirds the very definition of the word “racism.” Currently, the Merriam-Webster Dictionary defines racism as “a belief that race is the primary determinant of human traits and capacities.” It adds that “racism” also includes the belief that “racial differences produce an inherent superiority of a particular race.” Because the white race is inherently racist against the black race, according to Mitchum, this generic definition of “racism” has got to go. Instead, it will be redefined to target specifically white people, whom Mitchum believes are oppressors in American society. As you may recall, this is the same thing that racist Sarah Jeong from The New York Times also believes.

“I basically told them that they need to include that there’s a systematic oppression upon a group of people,” Mitchum is quoted as saying. “It’s not just, ‘Oh, I don’t like someone.'” Dear, Kennedy Mitchum: You’re a racist
Initially, Merriam-Webster told Mitchum to pretty much hit the road. But something changed, presumably due to outside black supremacist pressure, that caused Merriam-Webster to change its mind and agree to include Mitchum’s opinions as part of the official definition for the word “racism.” “They were basically like, ‘Yeah, we’re not gonna change it because … we focus on literature,” Mitchum says about the first response she received to her petition. “The dictionary definitions have to come from literature, and they focus on the majority and the way they write and see racism.” “And so I was just like, ‘It doesn’t make sense because the majority aren’t the people who are experiencing racism.'” The idea that the “majority,” aka white people in Mitchum’s view, do not ever experience racism is both false and racist, which makes Mitchum’s claim ironic and hypocritical. But Merriam-Webster was apparently strong-armed into accepting it as part of the official lexicon. “A revision to the entry for racism is now being drafted to be added to the dictionary soon, and we are also planning to revise the entries of other words that are related to racism or have racial connotations,” tweeted Drake in response to the news. Merriam-Webster itself also admitted that “this revision would not have been made” without the persistence of Mitchum, who has single-handedly redefined the word “racism” to exempt everyone except for white people – which in and of itself is racist. Since the Merriam-Webster Dictionary is only updated twice or maybe three times a year, Mitchum’s new definition will not appear until the next revision. In the meantime, every major news outlet is praising her for her “stunning bravery” in sticking it to the white man with her new definition. “I think everyone really needs to realize what their strengths are and how they can contribute to the movement,” Mitchum added with pride. “And once they do that, I think we’re really going to be able to get some places.””

     Of course, the constitution is racist too, and that is going to come out in Australia with the Aboriginal recognition referendum, which is not much talked about at the moment, but it will be back, after they finish working us over here in the States:
  https://www.campusreform.org/?ID=15159

“A law professor is calling for changes to the “outdated” language of the Constitution. Richard Albert, a professor of law and government at the University of Texas-Austin, denounced the Constitution in an op-ed for The Hill published Tuesday, saying that “its gendered and racist words stand in the way of true reconciliation in this divided country and have no place in any modern society.” "no place in any modern society" Albert cites the 13th Amendment as an example of racism in the Constitution, saying that although it abolishes slavery it still includes the Fugitive Slave Clause; which, remaining in the Constitution, is “a painful reminder of America’s original sin.” The Constitution’s language also discriminates based on gender, Albert says. It uses exclusively male pronouns when referring to the presidency, he points out, admitting that this did not prevent Hillary Clinton from running in 2016, but suggests that the first woman to be elected to the House of Representatives -- Jeannette Rankin (R-Mont.), 100 years prior to Clinton’s candidacy -- faced disapproval merely because the Constitution’s language only allowed for male leaders. “Imagine how schoolchildren must feel when they read the Constitution in their basic civics course. Some will be made to feel less than welcome in their own country… The highest law of the land creates a hierarchy of citizenship.”

Albert condemns Roger Sherman’s argument that changing the founders’ original words would threaten the document’s integrity, saying it is better “to erase those texts that time had overrun or that present exigencies suggested should be removed,” as James Madison argued. If “racist and gendered terms” are removed, then the Constitution “would celebrate equality and inclusion, and give Americans a text proudly to call their own — one in which they would see themselves and their hopes reflected.” The radical left will stop at nothing to intimidate conservative students on college campuses. You can help expose them. “The Constitution is replete with obsolete and outdated language that weakens rather than enhances the feeling of belonging that a constitution should generate among a country’s citizens,” he concludes. “It is time to update the Constitution to reflect America’s modern values of equality and inclusion.”

     Exactly the same argument will be rolled out in the recognition referendum in Australia, so don’t go to sleep, and get ready for it, as it is still coming your way. One can be sacked in this anarcho-tyrannical culture, now for saying something once thought to be a part of Enlightenment morality, that everyone’s life matters; apparently White lives do not matter:
  https://www.zerohedge.com/political/umass-nursing-dean-fired-saying-everyones-life-matters

     Even medals that look like they have a dark-skinned character portrayed in a less than perfect light must be banned.
  https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-8478341/Michael-Palin-backs-calls-redesign-Order-St-Michael-St-George-medal-petition.html