No Male, So No Rape (Only Transperson) By Richard Miller (London)
A hospital here in Britain has made news proclaiming that an alleged rape did not take place in a single sex ward because no male was present. There was, however, a transperson with, presumably functional male genitals. Under the law such a person could still be convicted of rape. But, I suppose, it did not look good for the gender agenda, so the denial when the hospital could have said: yes, the CCTV evidence plus victim testimony does indicate a transperson raping a non-transperson, formerly known as women. Wokeness always trumps protection of mainstream people, under the law, or what was once the law.
“A National Health Service (NHS) hospital in Britain told police that the rape of a woman on one of their supposedly single-sex wards by a trans patient “could not have happened” as there was “no male” at the scene.
The attack took place in 2021 and was initially denied by hospital bosses — despite CCTV evidence — who insisted that “the rape could not have happened” as “there was no male in the hospital”.
Technically, the Sexual Offences Act of 2003 stipulates that “A person (A) commits an offence [of rape] if he intentionally penetrates the vagina, anus or mouth of another person (B) with his penis, B does not consent to the penetration, and A does not reasonably believe that B consents” (emphasis added) — although a biologically male transwoman with intact genitalia is of course perfectly capable of perpetrating the same deeds.
After the victim reported the attack — who took place on what was supposed to be a supposedly single-sex ward — to the police, officers contacted the unnamed hospital, but were informed that “there was no male in the hospital, therefore the rape could not have happened”, The Telegraph reports.
While it is unclear as of the time of publication if there have been any arrests, the police are reportedly carrying out an investigation into the rape.
The case has since been discussed in the British parliament’s House of Lords during a debate on single-sex wards, with Baroness Emma Nicholson of Winterbourne railing against the anonymous hospital.
“It has taken nearly a year for the hospital to agree that there was a male on the ward and, yes, this rape happened,” Nicholson said.
“During that year she has almost come to the edge of a nervous breakdown because being disbelieved about being raped in hospital has been such an appalling shock. The hospital, with all its CCTV, has had to admit that the rape happened and that it was committed by a man,” Nicholson asserted as she lambasted hospital staff.
Speaking to Breitbart London, British actor turned political pundit and Reclaim Party leader Laurence Fox condemned the hospital’s response to the attack.
“Once society breaks down to such an extent that objective reality means nothing, these vile events will escalate exponentially. We must come together to protect women and attack the woke cultural revolution that seeks to remove all the rights brave women who came before fought for,” Fox said.
“Our foundational institutions are all infected with this repellent ideology,” he added.”
Comments